Amazon has brought back one of its more popular deals, but this time for the Echo Pop. You can bundle the Echo Pop with 4 months of Amazon Music Unlimited for just $39.99. That’s basically getting the Echo Pop for the regular price, and getting four months of Amazon Music Unlimited for free.
This deal is only available for some customers. It appears that you do need to be an Amazon Prime Member. As well as not currently subscribing to Amazon Music Unlimited, to get this deal. So you need Prime, and can’t have Music Unlimited.
Why you should buy the Echo Pop & Amazon Music Unlimited bundle
The Echo Pop is a small, affordable, and easy-to-use smart speaker that is perfect for anyone who wants to get started with the world of Alexa. It features a sleek, compact design that fits in any space, and it can be used to control your smart home devices, get information, play music, and more.
Amazon Music Unlimited is a premium music streaming service that offers access to over 90 million songs, ad-free. You can listen to your favorite songs on-demand, and you can also create custom playlists and stations.
With the Echo Pop and 4 months of Amazon Music Unlimited bundle, you get the best of both worlds. You get a great smart speaker that is perfect for everyday use. And you also get access to a premium music streaming service that will keep you entertained for hours on end.
Here are some of the reasons why you should buy this bundle:
It’s a great value: The Echo Pop is priced at $49.99, and Amazon Music Unlimited is priced at $9.99 per month. So, you’re saving $30 when you buy the bundle.
It’s the perfect way to get started with Alexa: If you’ve never used Alexa before, the Echo Pop is a great way to get started. It’s easy to use and set up, and it’s a great way to learn about all the things that Alexa can do.
It’s the perfect way to listen to music: Amazon Music Unlimited is a great music streaming service. It has a huge library of songs, and you can listen to them ad-free.
It’s a great gift: If you’re looking for a great gift for someone who loves music, the Echo Pop and 4 months of Amazon Music Unlimited bundle is a perfect choice.
If you’re looking for Alexa and enjoy ad-free music, then this bundle is a great choice for you.
If you’re looking for a versatile and easy-to-use smart speaker, then this bundle is a great option.
AI-generated music is making its presence known in the music industry, but the Recording Academy looks in the opposite direction. In a recent interview, the Academy made up its mind known regarding this kind of music. Will they make an appearance in various categories during the award shows, or will they take the back seat?
This question might weigh down on the minds of lots of people looking forward to this year’s award ceremony. The past few months have brought a ton of AI-generated music to the internet, but Grammy will ignore these entries. From the interview, the Recording Academy makes it clear that they will only consider human creators for their award categories.
From this decision, it is clear that the Academy is already setting a standard and guidelines to govern the use of AI in music production. Certainly, AI-based technology will shape lots of industries, including the music industry, and the Recording Academy recognizes this. But, by updating their requirements for music and performances to win awards, the academy is leveling the playing field.
More information regarding the Grammy’s decision on AI-generated music
From the Recording Academy’s decision regarding AI-generated music, it is clear that the focus is on human creativity. The entire creative process leading to the release of the song needs to be from a human. Songs written or produced by AI would not be considered in Grammy categories.
However, songs that have AI influence in certain elements of the creative process might be considered. Performance categories of the Grammy Awards will also ignore AI-generated music performances and focus more on human creativity. If a song or performance was created or done by an AI model, hence lacking human creativity, the Recording Academy will not consider such entries.
For some reason, the Recording Academy will still accept AI-generated music and content submission. Possibly they will then evaluate these submissions to determine the level of human creativity before vetting them as being fit or not fit for consideration. Giving room for AI assistance in music creation shows that even the Recording Academy acknowledges the role AI will play in the music industry.
In the coming future, the music industry might get to see some AI tools that might help them spice up their music and performances. However, these tools would not replace human creativity, but only improve the result of such creativity. Other music organizations and platforms are also fighting against AI-generated songs as they aim to push original content.
XSS is a very commonly exploited vulnerability type that is very widely spread and easily detectable, and also it is one of the important vulnerabilities in OWASP TOP 10.
What is XSS(Cross-Site Scripting )? An attacker can inject untrusted snippets of JavaScript into your application without validation.
This JavaScript is then executed by the victim who is visiting the target site. It is classified into three types.
Reflected XSS
Stored XSS
DOM-Based XSS
In Reflected XSS, an attacker sends the victim a link to the target application through email, social media, etc.
This link has a script that executes when visiting the target site.
In Stored XSS, the attacker can plant a persistent script in the target website which will execute when anyone visits it.
With DOM Based XSS, no HTTP request is required; the script is injected as a result of modifying the DOM of the target site in the client-side code in the victim’s browser and is then executed.
Understanding XSS – Cross-Site Scripting
http://test.gbhackers.com/search?q=gbhackers
Searched for <strong>gbhackers</strong>
<script>alert(document.cookie)</script>
Imagine that we have an URL like this, and we are searching for gbhackers,and it will reflect the following query in the browser.
We trust the domain, and we trust the resource being entered in the search page, so now the untrusted part gbhackers was the query string entered by the browser; the attacker can manipulate the value anything they like, for example, they change like this <script>alert(document.cookie)</script>.
This is just a simple query to pop up an alert on the webpage if someone requested the page of the attacker’s website and passed the document.
Cookies as a parameter in the website, then the attacker can gather all cookies.If they get Auth cookies, they cansimply hijack user sessions.
They could retrieve data from the target web application, modify content on the target page, redirect the victim to another malicious or spoof site, or use it to install other malware on the victim’s system.
The consequences of any of the above can seriously impact your ability to conduct business, your customers, and your organization’s reputation.
Apple Watch Series 3, Series 4, Series 5, Series 6, Series 7, and SE
The updates may already have reached you in your regular update routines, but it doesn’t hurt to check if your device is at the latest update level. If a Safari update is available for your device, you can get it by updating or upgrading macOS, iOS, or iPadOS.
The Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) database lists publicly disclosed computer security flaws. The three actively exploited CVEs are:
CVE-2023-32434: a vulnerability in the Kernel due to an integer overflow. Successful exploitation would enable the attacker to execute arbitrary code with kernel privileges. Apple is aware of a report that this issue may have been actively exploited against versions of iOS released before iOS 15.7. This vulnerability was part of the so-called Operation Triangulation.
CVE-2023-32435: a memory corruption issue in the WebKit component for iPhone 6s (all models), iPhone 7 (all models), iPhone SE (1st generation), iPad Air 2, iPad mini (4th generation), and iPod touch (7th generation). Processing web content may lead to arbitrary code execution. Apple is aware of a report that this issue may have been actively exploited against versions of iOS released before iOS 15.7.This vulnerability was also part of the so-called Operation Triangulation.
CVE-2023-32439: a type confusion issue in the WebKit component. Processing maliciously crafted web content may lead to arbitrary code execution. Apple is aware of a report that this issue may have been actively exploited.
WebKit is the browser engine that powers Safari on Macs as well as all browsers on iOS and iPadOS (browsers on iOS and iPadOS are obliged to use it). It is also the web browser engine used by Mail, App Store, and many other apps on macOS, iOS, and Linux.
An integer overflow is a programming error that allows an attacker to manipulate a number the program uses in a way that might be harmful. If the number is used to set the length of a data buffer (an area of memory used to hold data), an integer overflow can lead to a buffer overflow, a vulnerability that allows an attacker to overloaded a buffer with more data than it’s expecting, which creates a route for the attacker to manipulate the program.
Type confusion vulnerabilities are programming flaws that happen when a piece of code doesn’t verify the type of object that is passed to it before using it. So let’s say you have a program that expects a number as input, but instead it receives a string (i.e. a sequence of characters), if the program doesn’t properly check that the input is actually a number and tries to perform arithmetic operations on it as if it were a number, it may produce unexpected results which could be abused by an attacker.
Type confusion can allow an attacker to feed function pointers or data into the wrong piece of code. In some cases, this could allow attackers to execute arbitrary code on a vulnerable device. So, an attacker would have to trick a victim into visiting a malicious website or open such a page in one of the apps that use WebKit to render their pages. In the case of Operation Triangulation these were reportedly delivered via iMessage as zero-click exploits.
We don’t just report on iOS security—we provide it
So, you’re such an avid TV watcher that one program at a time is too slow-paced for you. Well, YouTube TV is testing a feature that could let you cram up to four TV programs into your eyes at once. YouTube TV calls this Multiview.
So, this feature isn’t rolling out widely, so don’t expect to see it yet. In fact, there’s a high chance that you won’t see it because YouTube is testing this on a limited selection of users. If you’re selected, then you’ll see a notification from the company. Be sure to check YouTube TV notifications and even dive into your emails to see if you’ve been selected.
YouTube TV Multiview could be fun (but very limited at first)
So, as the name suggests, this feature will let you watch up to four different programs at the same time. Why not catch up on the game while your episode of Law & Order is on commercial break? While four screens at once may seem excessive, we’re sure that someone will find a way to utilize all of them.
Before you get too excited about this feature, there are a few things to know. As stated before, this is in testing, so it won’t be widely available. If you do gain access, just know that you should expect some bugs and stability errors. You’re beta testing a new feature, so it’ll get better over time.
Next, there’s a limited number of channels that will support this feature for the time being. The selection is very limited, and it’s even more limited if you’re not a sports fan. In fact, YouTube TV Multiview is only supporting sports channels at the moment.
This feature, for its initial launch, will only support a limited list of channels curated by YouTube itself. These will only be channels that show NCAA tournament games.
If this news upsets you, just hang tight. YouTube mentioned in a blog post (Via The Verge) that this is only for the initial testing phase. As time goes on, the company will add more options to this feature. We’re not sure about the timeline, but we can expect the feature to improve over time.
Here’s something none of us had on our bingo board for 2023. Apparently, Twitter owner, Elon Musk challenged Facebook’s CEO Mark Zuckerberg to a fight. And Zuckerberg agreed.
Zuckerberg agreed to a cage match with Musk, in a post on his Instagram account. Which has been confirmed to be legit.
Musk then responded with “Vegas Octagon”. He also later tweeted that he has a “great move that I call ‘The Walrus,’ where I just lie on top of my opponent and do nothing.”
So how did this all start? Well, Musk has apparently been taunting Zuckerberg internally at Twitter. Meanwhile, over at Meta, chief product officer, Chris Cox told employees that it believes creators want a version of Twitter that is “sanely run” and that drew cheers from employees. Zuckerberg also stated in a recent podcast interview that “I’ve always thought that Twitter should have a billion people using it”.
Will this fight actually happen?
It’s unclear whether this fight will actually happen. Though it would be good for a charity event, sort of like Creator Clash. Neither CEO is in their prime however. With Elon Musk being 51, and Mark Zuckerberg being 39 years old. However, Musk does have the upper hand in physical size, and he’s also talked about being in “real hard-core street fights” while he was growing up in South Africa. Now, how true that is, is another story.
Zuckerberg is an aspirational MMA fighter, and is already winning Jiu-Jitsu tournaments. He has also claimed to have completed the grueling “Murph Challenge” workout in under 40 minutes. So it’s quite clear that Zuckerberg has the upper hand here.
While this might not be the most impressive fight ever, it could be one of the most entertaining. And that might be enough to make a whole lot of money. After all, the Paul brothers made a ton boxing, and wrestling, and they are very hated.
A stealthy and dangerous spyware campaign from the DoNot APT possibly targeted hundreds of Android users by posing as fake VPN and chat apps on The Google Play Store. Users must check their devices and delete the apps immediately if found running.
DoNot APT Spyware Campaign Spread Via Fake Android Apps
Researchers from the cybersecurity firm Cyfirma caught a sneaky spyware campaign targeting Android users. However, this spyware campaign is different from the usual campaigns in that it seemingly targets users from a specific nation.
Specifically, the researchers noticed the activity from the notorious DoNot APT Group – an Indian (presumably, state-backed) threat actor’s group. The recent DoNot APT activity involves spreading spyware via two fake Android apps that appeared on the Google Play Store. These include the iKHfaa VPN app and nSure Chat app. Both these apps belonged to the same developer named as “SecurITY Industry” on Play Store.
A third application, “Device Basics Plus app” – a device help utility providing basic system details to the user on a single screen, also belonged to the same developers. But it didn’t exhibit any malicious behavior at the time of analysis.
Regarding the iKHfaa VPN app, the app seemed legit as it offered the basic VPN functionality as claimed. However, it asked for explicit device permissions, including device location and contacts list, which alarmed the researchers. Also, the “About” section of the app displayed the actual app name (Liberty VPN – a legit VPN app) the threat actors used to design their malicious VPN on.
Likewise, the nSure Chat app also requested similar permissions, and analyzing the app revealed the uncanny malicious code similarities between the two apps. Both apps transmitted stolen data from the device to the attackers’ C&C.
The detailed technical analysis of this campaign and the malicious apps is available in the researchers’ report.
The Threat Still Persists…
Apparently, this campaign seems targeted at Android users in Pakistan. However, more details about the victims and the way of spreading this spyware to the intended victims remain unclear.
At the time of writing this story, the iKHfaa VPN app seems deleted from the Google Play Store. However, the nSure Chat and the Device Basics Plus apps still exist, indicating that the threat isn’t over.
While the apps show a very small number of downloads, it’s still wise for Android users to scan their devices for the possible presence of any of these apps. And if detected, users must delete them immediately, followed by a robust antivirus scan, to remove the threat.
UPS is warning Canadian customers of potential phishing attempts after data was left accessible via look-up tool.
UPS Canada is warning customers in Canada of potential data exposure and the risk of phishing. People have started to receive letters like the one below from UPS, which some have assumed were “just” regular phishing alerts. As it turns out, the letter is specifically about the potential exposure of data via a look-up tool.
One example of the letter is below, via a tweet from threat analyst Brett Callow.
So @UPS_Canada sent me a letter about phishing and smishing. Turns out it wasn’t simply intended to be educational. In the 4th paragraph, it became apparent that it was actually a data breach notification. 1/2 pic.twitter.com/lw7PI7HORI
You’ll notice why recipients assumed it was a generic phish warning straight away: There is no reference to any actual incident until halfway down the page. The whole first half is a generic description of what phishing and smishing involve, alongside a link to examples and where genuine UPS texts originate.
I would think many people looking at this would have already tuned out and thrown it into the garbage. In this case, that would be a mistake. Anyone who reads on will (eventually) discover that all is not right in the land of parcel deliveries:
UPS is aware that some package recipients have received fraudulent text messages demanding payment before a package can be delivered. UPS has been working with partners in the delivery chain to try to understand how that fraud was being perpetrated.
The letter goes on to mention that an internal review took place to see if information it received from shippers was somehow contributing to these attempts taking place:
During that review, UPS discovered a method by which a person who searched for a particular package or misused a package look-up tool could obtain more information about the delivery, potentially including a recipient’s phone number.
UPS states that access to this information has now been limited, and people whose information may have been impacted are being notified out of “an abundance of caution”.
In terms of the data potentially accessed:
The information available through the package look up tools included the recipient’s name, shipment address, and potentially phone number and order number. We cannot provide you with the exact time frame that the misuse of our package look-up tools occurred. It may have affected packages for a small group of shippers and some of their customers from February 1, 2022 to April 24, 2023.
This isn’t great, and it’s exactly the kind of data needed to get the phishing ball rolling. Bleeping Computer notes some other messages doing the rounds which may be tied to this campaign, which include delivery fee charges owed, and missing shipments of Lego.
Parcel Delivery scams are a big problem, and target firms like UPS and even the US Postal Service. Being able to grab personal details from actual delivery firms is a major boon for scammers so it’s essential to be on your guard where mysterious parcel texts and emails are concerned.
How to avoid fake parcel scams
Check your orders. The email isn’t going anywhere, and neither is your order. You have plenty of time to see if you recognise parcel details, and also the delivery network.
Avoid attachments. So-called invoices or shipping details enclosed in a ZIP file should be treated with suspicion.
Watch out for a sense of urgency. Be wary of anything applying pressure to make you perform a task. A missing payment and only 24 hours to make it? A time-sensitive refund? Mysterious shipping charges? These are all designed to hurry you into action.
If in doubt, make contact with the company directly via official channels.
We don’t just report on threats—we remove them
Cybersecurity risks should never spread beyond a headline. Keep threats off your devices by downloading Malwarebytes today.
This time around, we’re comparing some high-end offerings from OnePlus and Samsung. We’ll compare the OnePlus 11 vs Samsung Galaxy S23+. Truth be said, the Galaxy S23+ is not the most powerful phone Samsung has to offer, but it’s not far from it. We’ve already covered the OnePlus 11 vs Galaxy S23 Ultra comparison. That being said, the Galaxy S23+ is a compelling phone in its own right, so this should be interesting.
We’ll first list the specs of both devices, and will then move to compare them across a number of categories. We’ll compare their designs, displays, performance, battery life, cameras, and audio performance. If you’re in the market for a high-end device, these two should be considered, that’s for sure. So, let’s get started, shall we?
Specs
OnePlus 11
Samsung Galaxy S23+
Screen size
6.7-inch QHD+ LTPO3 Fluid AMOLED display (120Hz refresh rate, curved, 1,300 nits peak brightness, LTPO down to 1Hz)
Both devices are made out of metal and glass, and both feature rounded corners. The in-hand feel is a bit different, though. The OnePlus 11 is noticeably taller and wider than the Galaxy S23+. It’s also thicker than Samsung’s offering. On top of everything, the OnePlus 11 is the lighter of the two phones. It weighs 205 grams, compared to 196 grams of the Samsung Galaxy S23+.
Both devices utilize aluminum for their frames. The OnePlus 11 has Gorilla Glass 5 on the back, while the Galaxy S23+ features Gorilla Glass Victus 2. The bezels are quite thin on both devices. The OnePlus 11 has a display camera hole in the top-left corner, and a curved display. The Galaxy S23+ has a centered display camera hole at the top, and it also includes a flat display.
They do look different from the back too, even more so. The OnePlus 11 has a round camera island, with three cameras inside it. The Galaxy S23+, on the other hand, has three separate camera islands, each of which packs in a single camera. The Galaxy S23+’s backplate is flatter than the one on the OnePlus 11. Both phones come with IP certification, but the Galaxy S23+ offers more in that regard. It has IP68 certification for water and dust resistance, while the OnePlus 11 is limited to IP64 certification.
OnePlus 11 vs Samsung Galaxy S23+: Display
The OnePlus 11 features a 6.7-inch QHD+ (3216 x 1440) LTPO3 Fluid AMOLED display. That panel is curved, and it can project up to 1 billion colors. It has Dolby Vision and HDR10+ content support, while it also supports a 120Hz refresh rate. This display has a 20:9 aspect ratio, and it can go up to 1,300 nits of brightness at its peak. The Gorilla Glass Victus is applied on top of the display, for protection purposes.
The Galaxy S23+, on the flip side, includes a 6.6-inch fullHD+ (2340 x 1080) Dynamic AMOLED 2X display. This display is flat, and it offers a 120Hz refresh rate. HDR10+ content is supported, and the display goes up to 1,750 nits of brightness at its peak. The display aspect ratio here is 19.5:9, while the Galaxy S23+’s panel is protected by the Gorilla Glass Victus 2, in case you were wondering.
Both of these displays are great, actually. They both have great viewing angles, and both offer vivid colors with deep blacks. The OnePlus 11’s panel is sharper, but not many of you will notice the difference. The Galaxy S23+’s panel does get brighter, and you may notice that if you use your phone outdoors in direct sunlight, it is noticeable. The touch response is great on both displays, and a 120Hz refresh rate is well-optimized in both cases.
OnePlus 11 vs Samsung Galaxy S23+: Performance
The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 fuels both of these smartphones. Well, the Galaxy S23+ does come with the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, which is clocked a bit higher. The OnePlus 11 includes up to 16GB of LPDDR5X RAM, and up to 512GB of UFS 4.0 flash storage. Do note that only the 128GB storage model has UFS 3.1 storage. The Galaxy S23+ comes with 8GB of LPDDR5X RAM, and up to 512GB of UFS 4.0 storage.
Both smartphones offer outstanding performance. They’re extremely smooth, we did not notice any lag or anything of the sort. Considering their specs, chances are it will stay that way for a while, but we’ll see. They do a great job with regular, everyday tasks, and even with demanding stuff, such as gaming. Neither phone gets too hot during gaming, or anything of the sort, and both can handle even the most demanding titles for Android. They’re basically on the same level in terms of performance.
OnePlus 11 vs Samsung Galaxy S23+: Battery
The OnePlus 11 includes a 5,000mAh battery on the inside. The Galaxy S23+, on the flip side, has a 4,700mAh battery inside its shell. The battery life is not exactly comparable, though. We’ve been able to get outstanding battery life with the OnePlus 11, not so much with the Galaxy S23+. Don’t get me wrong, the Galaxy S23+ battery life is good, but it’s nowhere near the OnePlus 11 level.
We’ve been able to cross the 10-hour screen-on-time mark with the OnePlus 11 a number of times. That phone truly shines when it comes to battery life. You can expect something closer to 7-7.5 hours of screen-on-time with the Galaxy S23+, that’s still great, though. We’re only sharing our experiences here, of course, your mileage may vary. You’ll use your devices differently, with different apps, and different signal strengths.
The OnePlus 11 blows away the Galaxy S23+ in terms of charging speed, but the Galaxy S23+ is more versatile. OnePlus’ flagship supports 100W wired (80W in the US) charging, and that’s it. The Galaxy S23+ supports 45W wired, 15W wireless, and 4.5W reverse wireless charging. Another thing to note is that the OnePlus 11 does include a charger in the box, unlike the Galaxy S23+.
OnePlus 11 vs Samsung Galaxy S23+: Cameras
The OnePlus 11 boasts a 50-megapixel main camera, a 48-megapixel ultrawide unit (115-degree FoV), and a 32-megapixel telephoto camera (2x optical zoom). The Galaxy S23+, on the other hand, has a 50-megapixel main camera, a 12-megapixel ultrawide camera (120-degree FoV), and a 10-megapixel telephoto camera (3x optical zoom). It’s worth noting that Hasselblad is also a part of the OnePlus 11 offering, mainly in regards to color tuning.
Both of these phones do a great job when it comes to photography. During the day, both phones provide vivid, and sharp images, with plenty of detail. They also do a great job when it comes to HDR shots. The images do look a bit different, but both results end up looking rich and nice. We preferred the ultrawide camera of the OnePlus 11 in all conditions, and the telephoto camera on the Galaxy S23+, mainly due to the optical zoom benefit.
In low light, both phones handle themselves nicely. They both tend to light up the scene quite a bit, which is a look most people prefer. They’re doing their best to capture the best photo, not necessarily the most realistic one. Neither phone shines in the video recording department, but they’re both more than good enough. Both companies issued a number of camera updates since launch, and fixed some issues they faced early on. These cameras are easy to recommend.
Audio
There is a set of stereo speakers included on both the OnePlus 11 and Samsung Galaxy S23+. Those speakers are good on both devices, though they’re a bit louder on the OnePlus 11. We did prefer the sound coming from the Galaxy S23+, as it seemed to be a bit more detailed, though the difference is not big at all.
What you won’t find on either phone is an audio jack. You will have to resort to their Type-C ports for wired audio connections. If you prefer wireless audio, on the other hand, both phones offer support for Bluetooth 5.3.
In a letter to Meta, Google, and Twitter, US Senators have questioned the Big Tech abilities to fight misinformation ahead of the 2024 election after mass layoffs.
The tech giants have reduced their headcounts due to economic slowdown and post-Covid corrections. These companies own the biggest online platforms and could significantly impact public opinion.
The Senators now worry that mass layoffs might hinder the companies from fulfilling their commitment to combating misinformation. The layoffs also included members of content moderation teams who are responsible for dealing with false content on the platforms.
Minnesota Democratic Sen. Amy Klobuchar, Vermont Democratic Sen. Peter Welch, and Illinois Democratic Sen. Dick Durbin wrote the letter on Tuesday. They warned that the emergence of AI to mislead voters is “particularly troubling.”
Big Tech layoffs could impact US 2024 Elections, Senators Says
The tech companies are now facing one of the biggest exodus in their history. The problem for Big Tech is more considerable. Following the Elon Musk takeover, Twitter laid off nearly 80% of its staff, including content moderations and some engineering teams.
Google parent company Alphabet also plans to reduce 12,000 of its headcounts as well as pause the construction of a new Campus in California. Likewise, Facebook’s parent company Meta wants to eliminate 21,000 jobs over two rounds of layoffs. The impacted staff are said to get severance payments.
It remains to be seen how this exodus could impact the US 2024 election. In a statement to CNN, Meta spokesperson Andy Stone said, “We remain focused on advancing our industry-leading integrity efforts and continue to invest in teams and technologies to protect our community – including our efforts to prepare for elections around the world.”
Ahead of the 2024 election, some platforms are changing their content moderation policies. For example, YouTube now allows users to question the validity of the 2020 election and say it was stolen. Senators also pointed out the Twitter content moderation “Challenges” after Musk’s takeover and his mass layoffs.
Twitter, Meta, and Google CEO must respond to the letter by July 10. Senators asked CEOs how they prepare for the 2024 election and what their plans are to combat misinformation. Additionally, the companies need to clarify whether they need to hire content moderators and how they can battle AI-generated deepfakes in politics.
.png
)
