They’re Simple, But In A Good Way

0
[ad_1]

The premium earbuds market is full of so many wonderful devices, but it can sometimes have a high barrier to entry. The beyerdynamic FreeBYRD are fantastic premium earbuds (you can read our glowing review here), but, at $299, they’re pretty pricey if you’re just breaking into the premium earbuds market.

Enter Edifier with the affordable W240TN. These are a set of earbuds with some of the perks that you get from more expensive earbuds, but they’re priced at a compelling price. Are these worth your $79.99? Let’s find out in this review.

Edifier W240TN: Hardware and design

The design of these earbuds is pretty classy. Since these are rather inexpensive, you’re not getting the most premium materials here, but they look nice anyway.

Edifier W240TN 5

The housing for the button is made of plastic, but it has the appearance of being metallic. That definitely gives them a more premium appearance. The rest of the body is made from glossy plastic.

Edifier W240TN: Sound quality

The sound quality of these earbuds is a nuanced story. For starters, the sound quality is solid. It’s tuned toward the higher side of the spectrum, and that makes for a more open sound. This is a nice change of pace from earbuds that are so focused on bass that the sound winds up being muddy and cluttered.

What makes this nuanced is that the Edifier Connect app lets you deeply customize the sound. You’re able to customize it as much as you can with the Edifier NeoBuds S. You’re given a four-band EQ, but that’s not it. You can choose the frequency for each band down to the single Hz, which is pretty insane.

The lowest band can be set between 20Hz and 200Hz, 2001Hz-3KHz for the second lowest, 3001Hz-5KHz for the second highest, and 5001Hz-10KHz for the highest band.

Not only are you able to change the frequency, but you can adjust the Q factor of each band as well. This gives the EQ a ton of options for editing the sound to your liking.

If you want to save different EQ presets, you can do that as well. Audiophiles will enjoy tinkering and finding the perfect sound for them.

Not as top-heavy as the Neobuds S

One of the main issues with the Neobuds S is that they seemed to focus a bit too much on the high end. This made the music sound a bit shrill and tinny. Fortunately, that’s not the case for the W240TN. They’re tuned just right to make the vocals pop and keep the sound open.

Edifier W240TN 3

Edifier W240TN: Noises cancellation/Ambient Mode

One of the main features that these earbuds bring to the affordable earbuds market is noise cancellation. This technology cancels out the noise in your environment so you can better hear your content. This is a well-sought-after feature, and it can be make-or-break for a pair of earbuds.

The noise cancellation on the Edifier W240TN is spectacular. They did a great job at filtering out a wide range of the noise in my environment. They easily handle inside noise like appliances and the AC on the inside. Taking them outside, they also did a great job at reducing the noise from traffic. I’d say that the noise cancellation is one of the strongest aspects of these earbuds.

Ambient mode

When it comes to the ambient mode, these earbuds bring one useful feature that most other premium earbuds don’t have. You’re able to adjust the volume of the sound coming in through the microphones. There are six volume levels that you can choose from.

Edifier W240TN: Battery life

You won’t have to worry about these earbuds lasting you a full day with these buds. Using the Edifier W240TN with the ANC on, I was able to get about 6.5 hours of playback per charge. The charging case almost triples the battery capacity of the earbuds, bringing them up to about 20 of playback.

When I turned the ANC off, I was able to get some more mileage out of the buds. I was able to get about 7.5 hours on a single charge and about 24 hours using the charging case.

These earbuds do also have fast charging to top them off quickly. I was able to fully charge the earbuds in under an hour. What’s neat is that you’re able to get about 2 hours of playback on a 10-minute charge. I tested this claim, and it’s accurate.

Edifier W240TN: Controls

The main gripe that I have about these earbuds is the limited selection of button controls. You can control your earbuds by either double-pressing or triple-pressing the button on then. That only gives you four options for controlling your media. This is extremely limited.

Edifier W240TN 1

You’re able to toggle ambient mode, toggle ANC, skip track, restart/go to previous track, raise volume, lower volume, activate voice assistant, activate Game mode, answer calls, reject calls, and mute calls. Having only four button gestures means that it’ll be tough picking which functions you want to add.

It would have been nice having single-press and press-and-hold gestures. Just adding those would double the number of gesutres, and make these a more compelling offer.

Edifier W240TN: Extra features

There are other goodies with these earbuds that make them just that much better.

IP rating

For starters, the Edifier W240TN are IP55 water and dust-resistant. They can withstand most solids, but you’d want to avoid using them around fine sand.

As for the water resistance, you’ll be fine if you’re caught out in the rain. The earbuds can also survive the occasional splash. You’ll just want to be careful because these can not be submerged in water, and you’ll also want to be careful around pool water.

Edifier W240TN 4

Game mode

People who hate Bluetooth latency will love Game mode. When this mode is activated, the latency between what you hear and what you see on your phone will be reduced. You can easily enable the Game mode from the Edifier Connect app. Using the mode, I was able to hear a significant reduction in the latency.

Overall, the Edifier W240TN are a great set of earbuds if you’re looking to break into the premium earbuds space. They have a nice set of features that enhance the experience, a few of which aren’t present with more expensive earbuds.

Edifier W240TN 6

You should buy these earbuds if:

  • You’re looking for an affordable pair of earbuds
  • You don’t want too much bass
  • You like to customize your sound
  • You want good battery life
  • You want a more straightforward experience

You shouldn’t buy these earbuds if:

  • You want more bass in your sound
  • You want more control options
  • You’re looking for a ton of features

[ad_2]
Source link

Google Fi User Data Breached Through T-Mobile Hack

0
[ad_1]

According to Google Fi’s email sent to its customers on Monday, a limited amount of their customer data was exposed in T-Mobile’s breach after suspicious activity was noted in a system that contained Google Fi’s customer data.

Google Fi, Google’s official mobile virtual network operator (MVNO), has confirmed that data belonging to its customers was exposed in a recently discovered T-Mobile security breach. The incident was reported by Hackread.com on January 20th, 2023.

What does Google Fi have to do with T-Mobile?

For your information, Google Fi relies on T-Mobile and US Cellular for connectivity. It operates on the networks of US Cellular and T-Mobile, allowing customers to enjoy comprehensive coverage across the country.

Unlike traditional plans from Verizon or AT&T, Google Fi uses technology to switch between different cellular providers while your phone is in use. This means that if you’re using your phone and one carrier’s service becomes weaker than another’s in the area, your phone will automatically switch to a stronger signal – without any interruption in service.

T-Mobile Data Breach Details

On January 19th, T-Mobile published a regulatory filing revealing that an unauthorized threat actor had managed to access the data of 37 million of its current customers. The breach occurred in November 2022 and was discovered on January 5th, 2023.

T-Mobile Inc. informed law enforcement officials and cybersecurity consultants regarding the data hack, which included customers’ names, dates of birth, billing addresses, email addresses, and more than 37 million postpaid and prepaid customers.

Google Fi Warns About Data Exposure

According to Google Fi’s email sent to its customers on Monday, a limited amount of their customer data was exposed in T-Mobile’s breach after suspicious activity was noted in a system that contained Google Fi’s customer data.

Google has confirmed that no text message call contents or PINs were taken. Moreover, the exposed system did not store private customer data such as names, payment card details, email IDs, passwords, government IDs, etc.

However, the hackers could access account statuses, phone numbers, service plan details such as international roaming, and SMS card serial numbers. It is worth noting that, despite utilizing the T-Mobile network for its connections, Google did not name it as its primary service provider in the email.

Email sent to Google Fi customers:

Dear Google Fi customer,

We’re writing to let you know that the primary network provider for Google Fi recently informed us there has been suspicious activity relating to a third-party system that contains a limited amount of Google Fi customer data.

There is no action required by you at this time.

This system is used for Google Fi customer support purposes and contains limited data including when your account was activated, data about your mobile service plan, SIM card serial number, and active or inactive account status.

It does not contain your name, date of birth, email address, payment card information, social security number or tax IDs, driver’s license or other forms of government ID, or financial account information, passwords or PINs that you may use for Google Fi, or the contents of any SMS messages or calls.

Our incident response team undertook an investigation and determined that unauthorized access occurred and have worked with our primary network provider to identify and implement measures to secure the data on that third-party system and notify everyone potentially impacted. There was no access to Google’s systems or any systems overseen by Google.

If you are an active Fi user, please note that your Google Fi service continues to work as usual and was not interrupted by this issue.

What does this mean for me?

The accessed information included your phone number and limited technical information. This includes information about when your account was activated, SIM card serial number, account status (for example, whether your plan is active or inactive), and limited details about the mobile service plan and options provided by your Google Fi service (such as unlimited SMS or international roaming).

Google Fi User Data Breached Through T-Mobile Hack

Google has assured its customers that they don’t need to take any further action, and there was no unauthorized invasion of Google’s own systems or any system that it directly oversees.

More Data Breach News

  1. Google Employees Data Stolen After Data Breach
  2. Hackers Breach TPG Telecoms’ Email Host to Steal Client Data
  3. Australia’s 2nd-largest telecom firm suffers massive data breach
  4. Hacker extracts user data from Canadian Telecom Firm after rebuttal
  5. Telecom giant behind routing SMS discloses 5-year-long data breach

[ad_2]
Source link

French law to report cyberincidents within 3 days to become effective soon

0
[ad_1]

A French law has been announced that requires victims of a cyberincident to report within 72 hours after discovery. We have heard similar proposals that may come through

The pressure on victims of cybercrime to notify authorities in a timely manner is increasing from many sides and for multiple reasons.

On January 24, 2023 France passed a law (Article L12-10-1 of the Insurance Code) that victims of cybercrime are required to report the incident within 72 hours after discovery, if they want to be eligible for compensation by the insurance for losses and damages caused by the attack. In accordance with French law these provisions come into force three months after the announcement of this law. That effective date will be April 24, 2023.

Earlier, we saw a proposal from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to amend Form 8-K to require registrants to disclose information about a material cybersecurity incident within four business days after the registrant determines that it has experienced a material cybersecurity incident. Form 8-K is known as a “current report” and it is the report that companies must file with the SEC to announce major events that shareholders should know about.

In the take-down of the Hive ransomware group the international law enforcement agencies stressed how crucial it was that victims filed timely reports about the cybercrimes committed against them.

Cyber liability insurance

Cyber liability insurance is a type of insurance policy that protects businesses from the expenses incurred after the result of a data breach, including stolen or damaged intellectual property.

It may strike us as weird that the compensation by the insurance is what’s at stake here, but it’s incorporated in US law as well. The Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act was one of the initial Federal laws passed in 2015 to enable sharing of personal information on cyberincidents. And many states have enacted their own legislation to address cyberrisks in depth, from exclusions to penalties.

Every US state has a Data Breach Notification law that must be complied with when a certain number of consumers’ personally identifiable information (PII) is compromised. A few states have added requirements specifically for insurers to notify the state’s insurance department.

Insurance companies

The amount of money involved in cyberincidents is enormous. Cybercrime costs include damage and destruction of data, stolen money, lost productivity, theft of intellectual property, theft of personal and financial data, embezzlement, fraud, post-attack disruption to the normal course of business, forensic investigation, restoration and deletion of hacked data and systems, and reputational harm.

Covering these risks that amass to trillions of dollars per year is not something insurance companies will take on lightly. Their clients will have to show they were careful, protected, and diligent to be eligible for compensation. And now they will have to file a timely report.

Definitions

The French law has been criticized because some of the key definitions in the law are unclear or at least need further specification.

What a cyberincident is, in the context of this law, is rather clear, though. Accessing or remaining fraudulently in all or part of an automated data processing system, with the stipulation that when the result is either the deletion or modification of data contained in the system, or an alteration of the functioning of this system, the punishments are higher.

The responsible authority however, is unclear. Is it law enforcement, through the Ministry for the Interior’s general crime reporting portal, or does it depend on the nature of the crime? Time will tell. (This lack of clarity is also the norm in the United States, where some laws go into effect without having a clear model for how the laws will be enforced.)

Another point of discussion is put forward by 72 hours after discovery. Is this 72 hours after your log files show signs of an unauthorized access, or 72 hours after your staff was able to determine with certainty that it indeed was a security incident?

The details will undoubtedly be hammered out, but until then it seems prudent to err on the safe side.

Money talks

According to Malwarebytes security evangelist and ransomware expert Mark Stockley this kind of legislation could make a difference.

“Why? Because money talks and the foundation of combatting the ransomware problem is understanding it. That requires victims to come forward and report it. Timely reporting allows us to understand the big picture, but it also gives law enforcement the best chance to learn about the tools, techniques and practices of the attackers, and to share what they’ve learned.”

This is likely one of the reasons behind this law. As Mark continued to explain:

“Failure to report can cause serious problems: In 2017, one of the early ‘big game’ ransomware gangs, SamSam, was widely reported to be targeting government and healthcare institutions, because it seemed to attack them much more often. It later transpired that it didn’t attack them more often at all, but the government and healthcare sectors were much more likely to report an attack.”

If this new law turns out to help fight cybercrime, you can be sure that similar types of regulation will follow suit around the globe.

Communication

This new law will also affect the playbook by which an organization is going to act after identifying a breach. In most cases the investigation by internal or external experts will not have finished by the time you have to disclose that there has been an incident. This means it will likely need an extra step in your communications, where the first one will tell at least the responsible authority that something has happened. Depending on who that authority is and what form this notification has to be done in, others may have to be briefed as well.

A later communication can then disclose the details about what happened, how it could happen, and what the possible consequences are. But that type of information typically requires more investigation than you’ll be able to gather in three days.


We don’t just report on threats—we remove them

Cybersecurity risks should never spread beyond a headline. Keep threats off your devices by downloading Malwarebytes today.


[ad_2]
Source link

Advanced menstrual cycle tracking is coming to the Galaxy Watch 5

0
[ad_1]

The Samsung Galaxy Watch 5 does a great many things for a smartwatch, but advanced menstrual tracking isn’t one of them. That is however changing as today, Samsung announced that it will be adding advanced menstrual cycle tracking to the list of features the Galaxy Watch 5 offers.

Menstrual cycle tracking will be temperature-based which means big changes for the way periods are tracked using the device. Currently, it’s possible to track your period using the Galaxy Watch 5. But the capability is reliant on manual entry of data using the Samsung Health app. This method is less accurate for predictions. Going forward, this can all be done automatically, and the skin temperature tracking should provide a more accurate prediction. Of course, users should have the option to keep this disabled if they prefer.

The advanced tracking feature is powered by Natural Cycles fertility technology, as Samsung partnered with Natural Cycles to bring the feature to the Galaxy Watch 5.

Advanced menstrual cycle tracking will hit the Galaxy Watch 5 soon

This feature isn’t quite available but it will be soon. Samsung says users can expect to access it sometime in the second quarter. That means it’s only a few months away. However, the company doesn’t give an exact date of arrival. When it does launch though it will go live in 32 markets across the globe. This includes the US, UK, Korea, and many other countries across Europe.

Users can access the new temperature-based tracking capabilities from within the Samsung Health app. And it’ll be available on both the Galaxy Watch 5 and Galaxy Watch 5 Pro. The feature will be free to use, although you will need to set up the Samsung Health app initially if you’ve never used it before. For the full list of available countries where the advanced menstrual cycle tracking will be available visit Samsung’s official post.


[ad_2]
Source link

Opera is integrating ChatGPT in its browser with Shorten

0
[ad_1]

As the new era of browser wars continues to rage on with search giants like Google and Microsoft making their own AI chatbots, Opera is also making a big bet on artificial intelligence with the latest announcement of a new feature called “Shorten,” which uses the power of ChatGPT to generate summaries of webpages and articles.

With the addition of Shorten, Opera users will now have access to a bulleted summary of the webpage they’re looking at by simply tapping an icon located to the right of the address bar. However, Jan Standel, VP of marketing and communications, did not specify when the feature will be available when talking to The Verge. He did mention that the company is working on other ways to enhance the Opera experience with artificial intelligence. But the exact details of these additions have not been disclosed yet.

“We are excited to see the rapid roll-out of developer programs for solutions such as Google Bard, for example, and are starting to build and roll out new experiences in web browsing that not very long ago seemed impossible to achieve,” said Per Wetterdal, Opera’s head of strategic partnerships and AI.

Increasing competition in the browser market

Ever since the launch of AI tools like ChatGPT and Microsoft’s announcement of its integration into its Bing browser, search engine giants like Google, for the first time in decades, are fearing their domination. This move by Opera to incorporate AI into its browser comes in the same week when Microsoft started accepting invitations to preview the redesigned Edge browser with an “AI-powered copilot” that will be able to summarize web pages.

In response to this competition, Google also unveiled its own AI chatbot named Bard, powered by LaMDA (Language Model for Dialogue Applications). However, Bard’s debut was less than ideal as it gave an inaccurate response in the company’s demonstration, resulting in a drop in Alphabet’s stock by over 8% and a loss of $100 billion in market value in a single day.


[ad_2]
Source link

Without more U.S. subscribers to Twitter Blue, Musk might consider bankruptcy after all

0
[ad_1]
Just the other day Twitter CEO Elon Musk said that thanks to his purchase of the company, he has saved Twitter from bankruptcy and now has the company on a breakeven path. Still, it seems that not everything is working out as the multi-billionaire wants it to. According to The Information, only 180,000 Twitter users in the states were paying for a monthly Twitter Blue subscription by the middle of last month. That works out to about .2% of the social media site’s monthly active users.
Twitter Blue costs $8 per month or $7 per month if you pay for an annual subscription. A subscription allows you to add a blue checkmark to your account and gives you early access to new features including the Edit Tweet feature that allows subscribers to edit a tweet after posting it. Those who sign up via Apple’s App Store or the Google Play Store have to pay $11 per month or an extra $3 monthly to cover the 30% “tax” that both tech giants charge for in-app processing.

Musk reportedly told Twitter employees that he wants half of the company’s revenues to come from subscriptions. However, at the current rate, Twitter Blue will bring in only $27.8 million a year which is a long way from half of the company’s 2022 revenue of $4.4 billion. To pump up subscription income, Musk is reportedly looking at adding a higher membership tier that would allow users to browse the site with no ads.

Another plan is for Musk to charge businesses $1,000 a month for a gold verification badge and an extra $50 per month for any accounts associated with the business. Considering that Twitter is paying out over $1 billion a year in annual interest costs to cover the loans that Musk took out to pay for his acquisition, a lot more Twitter users-individuals and businesses-will need to feel that it is worthwhile to lay out the money each month to become a paid subscriber.

If this becomes too difficult a task for Musk, he might feel compelled to pull the plug on his acquisition and put Twitter in bankruptcy after all.


[ad_2]
Source link

Mailchimp suffers another cyber attack

0
[ad_1]

Marketing automation company Mailchimp has reported that it has been the victim of a social engineering attack-related data breach. This marks the second attack of this kind the company has suffered in less than a year. 

The breach took place on January 11 and, according to Mailchimp, involved an “unauthorized actor accessing one of [the] tools used by Mailchimp customer-facing teams for customer support and account administration”.  

Following this, the malicious actor launched social engineering attacks on Mailchimp employees and contractors used by the company. Through these attacks, the hacker was able to steal employee credentials and then used this login information to gain access to “select Mailchimp accounts”.

Mailchimp reported that the attack was targeted and limited to 133 accounts. In the wake of the attack, Mailchimp suspended access for those accounts compromised in the attack to protect users’ data, and notified the owners of the accounts of the suspicious activity. All those affected were notified by Mailchimp by January 12, and the company has been working with them to safely reinstate their accounts.

Mailchimp has not published any information on the users targeted by the attack, however evidence suggests that cryptocurrency and finance companies were the intended victims. Cryptocurrency company and developer of the Bored Ape Yacht Club NFT collection, Yuga Labs, warned its community on January 19 that it had been a victim of the social engineering attack.

In a series of tweets, the cryptocurrency company explained that its account was “one of many compromised” in the attack and specified that while the company does not frequently use Mailchimp, it wanted to warn its customers out of an “abundance of caution”. The company went on to clarify that while its data may have been accessed, there was currently no data that it had been exported.

This social engineering attack and data breach mirrors a similar attack against the company in March 2022, which also saw cryptocurrency and finance companies targeted.

Mailchimp’s 2022 data breach

On March 26, 2022, Mailchimp was the victim of a data breach following a social engineering attack. The attack saw the hackers gain access to and export data from Mailchimp accounts, which the malicious actors then used to target customers of businesses that used Mailchimp for business-related services.

Mailchimp said that the cyber security incident was “propagated by a bad actor who conducted a successful social engineering attack on Mailchimp employees, resulting in employee credentials being compromised”. 

The bad actor also attempted to send a phishing campaign to a user’s contacts from said user’s account using the information they obtained during the attack.

Mailchimp reported that 319 accounts were viewed and audience data was exported from 102 of those accounts. An investigation revealed that the businesses targeted were those within the cryptocurrency and finance industries.

As a result of the hack, bitcoin hardware wallet Trezor had an inside compromise of a newsletter database hosted on Mailchimp. Due to the compromise, its users were targeted by a malicious phishing attack on April 3, 2022.

This attack included false information about Trezor experiencing a “security attack”. It then prompted victims to download and connect their Bitcoin wallets to a Trezor suite lookalike app, in addition to entering their seed phrases into the app.

Trezor  stated: “For this attack to be successful, users had to install the malicious software on their devices, at which point their operating system should identify that the software comes from an unknown source. This warning should not be ignored as all official software is digitally signed by SatoshiLabs.”  

The company went on to say that users should only be concerned about their Bitcoin funds if they had entered their seed phrases into the malicious app. 


[ad_2]
Source link

Hisense PX1 4K UST Projector Review: Magnificent

0
[ad_1]
  • Update: An earlier version of this review mentioned that this was the PX1-Pro, it is actually the PX1, which is $700 less. The review has been updated to reflect that now.

On paper, the Hisense PX1 looks decent, but I didn’t think I was going to like it as much as I have. It doesn’t get overly bright, coming in at 2,000 ANSI Lumens. I’ve checked out UST projectors that have been much brighter. But, this is another example of why you shouldn’t read to much into specs. Because the PX1 is actually quite bright.

Now, before writing this review, I used this projector for well over two months. I’ve used it in a couple different rooms in my home, to see how it works in brighter and darker rooms. So with that said, let’s see if you should spend your hard earned money on this projector.

Hisense PX1 Review: Hardware

The Hisense PX1 is a bit cheaper than some of its competitors, like the BenQ V7050i. Their retail prices are about $1,000 apart, though BenQ does have that cool motorized panel that protects the lasers when not in use. So when I first got the PX1, I figured that the hardware build quality might suffer, to hit a lower price point. I was wrong.

The PX1 does have a plastic look to it, but it is very much not plastic. Some parts are, but majority of it is aluminum. And it does look really nice sitting in my living room. On the front, you’ll find a huge speaker grille, which is great to see, since it does have Dolby Atmos support. On the top, there’s a power button, and of course the lasers. With the back being where all the ports live. Which we’ll talk about in a moment. On the bottom there are four feet that are adjustable, so you can make the picture as straight as possible.

Now as far as ports go, there’s quite a few. There’s the port for power of course, at the bottom. In addition to that, we have a Coax port for cable, Audio In, Audio Out, LAN, a USB 2 port, as well as two HDMI ports. Both of these are HDMI 2.1 ports, though only the first HDMI port is an e-ARC and HDMI 2.1 port. There’s also a few serve ports available for Hisense to work on your projector.

Hisense px1 pro projector review AM AH 3

There are only two HDMI ports here, which isn’t the best, but the fact that both are HDMI 2.1 ports is really great to see. For me, I’ve had a Fire TV Cube plugged into one port, and for the last week, the other has had a Sonos Beam 2 connected. Which means if I wanted to use one for my PS5, I’d have to unplug one, which is unfortunate.

Hisense PX1 Review: Video quality

This is a tri-laser projector from Hisense. That’s more lasers than most other projectors on the market. Which does help quite a bit with picture quality. It also uses a single DLP chip that is able to take advantage of TI’s XPR fast-switch pixel shifting, which allows it to give you a full 4K resolution. Some other projectors will claim that it is 4K, but it actually is not. With Hisense, that’s not the case.

Hisense uses red, green and blue lasers for its primary colors and rotates them through in sequence, giving you a really great picture quality here. Hisense claims that it is able to cover 107% of the gamut of the BT.2020 spec. This is a spec that was defined to target 4K projectors specifically.

Hisense px1 pro projector review AM AH 6

The PX1 is able to fit up to 130-inches of screen on your wall, and surprisingly, even at that size, there’s no issues with focus. It still looks amazing at that size. Some other projectors, once you get over 100 inches, will start to lose focus and sharpness. But not for Hisense.

Hisense PX1 Review: Audio quality

Inside the PX1, there is a 30W speaker inside, which is optimized for Dolby Atmos. That’s going to give you a really great experience. Though I did still prefer to use my setup of a Sonos Beam 2 and Sub Mini with the PX1. That’s not to say that the PX1 is not a good sounding projector, but having a dedicated Sub does make a difference.

Hisense px1 pro projector review AM AH 4

Hisense does offer sound for ARC, WiSA and on Bluetooth. So you don’t have to stick with Hisense’s own speakers. But if you don’t have a soundbar, or don’t want to buy one, then it’s not needed.

Hisense PX1 Review: Software

Like a lot of other ultra short throw projectors, the Hisense PX1 is powered by Android TV. That’s fine. Android TV is good, except when it comes to projectors. And it’s not a Google issue either, it’s a Netflix issue. You see, Netflix will only certify devices that sell a certain amount – and it’s a high number, well over a million. So just having Android TV doesn’t mean that Netflix will work. In fact, you’ll need to sideload the mobile version of Netflix, which looks bad and acts even worse on a big screen like this. Not to mention it’s a lot of extra steps to launch the app every time.

Outside of the Netflix issues, the software is pretty good. Hisense did include a good amount of storage here and RAM, compared to the Chromecast. So that won’t be an issue. But that is also why I’ve been using the PX1 with a Fire TV Cube and a Chromecast with Google TV.

Hisense px1 pro projector review AM AH 5

Should you buy the PX1?

This year, I’ve been lucky enough to review a handful of projectors, mostly UST projectors, and the PX1 is my new favorite. It beat out the AWOL Vision projector, but not by much. Even though the PX1 isn’t as bright, it does have more accurate colors, which makes the picture itself look a lot more rich and contrasty. Making it my pick. It’s also smaller, than some other projectors on the market.

You should buy the Hisense PX1 if:

  • You are looking for a nice projector to put in your living room.
  • You are looking for a projector to play PlayStation 5 or Xbox Series X games at the full 4K/120fps.
  • You want a huge screen in your living room or den.

You shouldn’t buy the Hisense PX1 if:

  • You don’t like how dim projectors are compared to TVs.
  • You don’t want to spend nearly $3,000 on a projector.

[ad_2]
Source link

Hackers Using Geotargeting Tools to Launch Attacks

0
[ad_1]

According to Avanan, a Check Point Software Company, hackers are employing geotargeting tools to tailor phishing attacks to certain regions.

Geo Targetly is a legitimate online service that offers its own URL shortening service, similar to Bitly, called Geo Link. Using this service, scammers can conduct specialized attacks based on the geography and language of the victim.

How are Threat Actors Improving Phishing Tactics By Geo-Targeting Websites?

According to the researchers, in this assault, visitors are redirected through the geo-targeting platform Geotargetly, where they are presented with personalized, regional phishing pages.

Email Sent to Users in Colombia

Researchers say utilizing the user’s location, the tool is utilized to display advertisements. As a result, advertisements displayed to users in France would differ from those seen to users in the US. Hackers can now launch geo-specific phishing content and send their targets harmful emails that are regionally and linguistically tailored.

In the aforementioned example, the original email originates in Colombia, so if the user is in Colombia, they will be forwarded to a page that looks like it is from the Colombian government. This is how it goes:

https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/pdZxbYJ2HkZolnlQtpbnPmoXL-xc9xdjT4KVhT0H8RtMRNFxkwreSc2bZ29rCD4l0yQ-yIi_z7JCYL3YY06QhJVnhhiHnNzEb5Tzc40w7lXJWgr_50QL90ajMTWzoU0bZ6kq89oXmZJoJBlIsFO4AyY
Redirected to a Colombian government look-a-like page

“What is interesting is the ability for hackers to customize their attacks by region and to attack multiple users in multiple parts of the world at once”, Avanan researchers.

Hackers Utilizing the ‘Spray-and-Pray’ Method

The threat actors frequently use the ‘spray-and-pray’ method. Throw a lot of stuff at the wall and see what sticks the idea. Volume is the name of the game, and you’re hoping for a few occasional successful phishes.

“The ‘spray-and-pray’ method allows for the ability for hackers to target a large number of people at once, and ensure that it’s relevant, and localized. It’s spraying without the praying”, researchers explain.

In this case, a hacker can make a phishing link that takes users in a specific region to a fake login page that resembles the real one using the Geotargetly redirect. 

The likelihood that a user may fall for the assault is increased by this personalization. The content would be appropriate for their language and location, and the redirect is legitimate.

Hence, it is now more likely that ‘spray and pray’ tactics would succeed, enabling hackers to operate effectively on a worldwide scale.

Recommendations

Security experts can take the following precautions to protect themselves from these attacks:

  • Check URLs in email and in the browser before proceeding
  • Confirm with IT if the site is legitimate.

Network Security Checklist – Download Free E-Book


[ad_2]
Source link

Hackers are stealing millions with Trojan malware

0
[ad_1]

Several weeks ago, I received a phone call from my friend who is a business owner and works in the cargo industry. He informed me that US$24,000 had vanished from his bank account during the previous night. The bank customer care team could not assist and suggested that my friend file a report with the police.

The funds were transferred using a mobile app. The transaction was verified via a text message and appeared to be completely legitimate. My entrepreneur friend asked me to help since I have a cybersecurity background.

However, it was too late to do anything. The hackers used a banking Trojan to steal the money. The rogue app penetrated my friend’s smartphone long before the security incident happened.

To prevent similar issues in the future, it is good to understand the tactics and principles utilized by hackers who deploy this type of malware.

The emergence of banking Trojans

Malware that can redirect incoming SMS messages, including those with TAN codes, to hackers has been prevalent for approximately 15 years. There have also been Trojans that utilize USSD commands in order to transfer money from bank cards connected to phones. However, these viruses were not as advanced as their desktop counterparts.

What is Trojan malware?

The first sophisticated banking Trojan for Android devices appeared in 2011. It was the SpyEye banking Trojan that worked in conjunction with SpyEye malware for Windows. This “teamwork” helped malefactors to trick the multi-factor authentication mechanism.

SpyEye operated as follows:

  • When the user of an infected Windows system opened a banking website in their browser, malware on the desktop computer would perform a web injection, inserting code into the webpage.
  • The modified page displayed a message stating that due to increased cyber threats, the bank has implemented new security measures and the user is required to download a small app (approximately 35 KB) onto their phone for authorization.
  • This software piece was the SpyEye banking Trojan, created to intercept incoming SMS and resend them to hackers. Although the bank website address in the browser was correct and the HTTPS connection was established, the injection happened on the user’s side.

This scheme was not perfect as malicious actors needed to synchronize the mobile app and desktop components. However, the creators of SpyEye were able to overcome this issue.

For a few months, SpyEye caused severe concern among users of banking services, but its activity gradually decreased once it was added to most antivirus databases.

The state of banking Trojans today

Eventually, IT professionals at banks gained appropriate programming skills and banking applications migrated from desktops to mobile phones as Android and iPhone apps. This made it easier for malware creators to develop mobile banking Trojans, as they no longer needed to focus on infiltrating Windows systems.

Each owner of a smartphone with a banking app installed is a potential target for banking Trojans that, like other types of malware, often masquerade as useful and popular programs. Developers of banking Trojans do not advertise their malicious capabilities, which usually do not become apparent until later or after an app update.

In one instance, a banking Trojan was disguised as a program that combined multiple client apps for several major banks. Why use multiple apps when you can download just one?

There have also been instances where malicious elements were inserted into modified versions of genuine bank apps. These apps were distributed by fake bank websites that looked exactly like the real ones.

Mobile banking Trojans can also be spread through phishing SMS messages. There are many ways to trick users. For example, malefactors may offer to buy a product from a user registered on a classified ads site. Hackers may gather personal information about the recipient through leaked user data bases, so they are able to address the victim by their name and lower their guard. Potential victims are encouraged to click on a link within the message. Once they do so, they are redirected to an intermediate page that determines their device model and mobile service provider. They are then redirected to a fake page with an MMS message composed using their mobile carrier style. Upon clicking the faux MMS button, the Trojan is downloaded.

Some older mobile banking Trojans were quite basic in their methods. If the malware needed administrator rights to run, it would continually display a window demanding those rights until the harassed user agreed. Today, hackers may use various tactics to deceive potential victims. For example, a banking Trojan may cunningly request admin privileges by showing a Google Play alert saying that the app version is outdated and there is a need to use the latest version. Once the victim clicks “Yes,” malware is granted admin privileges.

Another banking Trojan fools victims into activating Accessibility Services that offer special features for people with disabilities. Once given the necessary permissions, the malware gains admin rights. Once inside a device, the Trojan remains in memory, waiting for the mobile banking app to be launched. Upon detecting this event, the Trojan identifies the running app and displays fake login and password forms on top of the real app. The entered data is sent to the hacker’s server.

Mobile banking Trojans can contain HTML code for several dozen pages that mimic the interfaces of popular banks. After this, the banking Trojan has to intercept a one-time password sent via SMS. Eventually, it gets access to the bank account. Actual messages sent by banks are hidden from users.

If the Trojan cannot directly access the bank account, it may instead steal bank card details. Sometimes it is done with the help of false windows that ask to add a bank card to Google Play. While anti-fraud systems used by reputable websites make it difficult to make purchases using stolen card details, it is still possible to pay for small items like online games or music on less popular sites that do not thoroughly check payment details.

Inside the mind of a Bankbot

Bankbots are a subcategory of mobile banking Trojans that have the ability to receive and execute various commands on an infected device. These commands can be transmitted through HTTP (in JSON format), SMS or even a Telegram channel. These commands allow the bankbot to disable SMS interception, silence the phone, send messages to specified phone numbers or execute USSD commands. Many bankbots can install additional APK files on a phone, infecting a device with new malware that has much more malicious features.

In addition, most such malicious apps may send SMS history, the entire address book, and other private info to the hacker’s server, as well as redirect incoming calls to a different phone number controlled by criminals. Some bankbots also have self-defense features that attempt to disable security tools like antivirus software. Bankbots often have a web-based admin panel that provides its operators with statistics on infected devices and information obtained from them.

A growing threat

The proliferation of mobile devices has spawned a thriving underground industry for creating banking Trojans. Dark web advertisements offer banking Trojans and other mobile malware strains like spyware and keyloggers for rent. Malefactors offer complete tech and admin support. Dark marketplaces advertise Trojan builders and kits that allow inexperienced criminals to create a Trojan masquerading as a specific bank app. This has led to a sharp increase in the number of banking Trojans and the likelihood of infection. Usually, rogue apps have admin privileges, and it is hard to find and remove them without doing a factory reset.

It is not uncommon for users to download malware from official sources like Google Play, as the technology for checking apps is not foolproof. Besides, Android is known to have numerous vulnerabilities that hackers can exploit.

While mobile security solutions can detect unauthorized app activity, it is the personal decision of each user to install a particular software on their phone.


[ad_2]
Source link