Google Pixel 8 Pro vs ASUS ZenFone 11 Ultra

0
[ad_1]

Large smartphones are all around us at this point in time. In this article, we’ll compare two such devices, which are also quite powerful. These two phones are the best Google and ASUS have to offer. We’ll compare the Google Pixel 8 Pro vs ASUS ZenFone 11 Ultra. The Pixel 8 Pro arrived in the fourth quarter of last year, while the ASUS ZenFone 11 Ultra followed in the first quarter of this year.

These two smartphones are quite different when it comes to their designs. They are both large and quite premium-feeling. As per usual, we’ll first compare their specifications. Following that, you’ll get to see their designs compared, along with their displays, performance, battery life, cameras, and audio output. Having said that, let’s get into it, shall we?

Specs

Google Pixel 8 Pro vs ASUS ZenFone 11 Ultra, respectively

Screen size:
6.7-inch Super Actua AMOLED display (flat, 120Hz LTPO, HDR10+, 2,400 nits)
6.78-inch LTPO AMOLED 2X (flat, 144Hz, 2,500 nits max brightness)
Display resolution:
2992 x 1344
2400 x 1080
SoC:
Google Tensor G3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
RAM:
12GB (LPDDR5X)
12GB/16GB (LPDDR5X)
Storage:
128GB/256GB/512GB/1TB (UFS 3.1)
256GB/512GB (UFS 4.0)
Rear cameras:
50MP (f/1.68 aperture, 82-degree FoV, 1.2um pixel size, OIS), 48MP (ultrawide, f/1.95 aperture, 125.5-degree FoV, 0.8um pixel size), 48MP (telephoto, f/2.8 aperture, 0.7um pixel size, 5x optical zoom)
50MP (wide, 24mm lens, gimbal OIS), 13MP (ultrawide, 120-degree FoV, f/2.2 aperture, 32MP (telephoto, 3x optical zoom, f/2.4 aperture)
Front cameras:
10.5MP (f/2.2 aperture, 1.22um pixel size)
32MP (wide, f/2.5 aperture)
Battery:
5,050mAh
5,500mAh
Charging:
30W wired, 23W wireless, reverse wireless (charger not included)
65W wired, 15W wireless, 10W reverse wired (charger not included)
Dimensions:
162.6 x 76.5 x 8.8mm
163.8 x 76.8 x 8.9mm
Weight:
213 grams
224 grams
Connectivity:
5G, LTE, NFC, Wi-Fi, USB Type-C, Bluetooth 5.3/5.4
Security:
In-display fingerprint scanner (optical) & facial scanning
In-display fingerprint scanner (optical)
OS:
Android 14
Android 14 with ZenUI
Price:
$999+
$899+
Buy:
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Best Buy)
ZenFone 11 Ultra (Amazon)

Google Pixel 8 Pro vs ASUS ZenFone 11 Ultra: Design

As you can see, both of these devices have flat displays on the front, with very thin bezels. You’ll also spot a centered display camera hole on both of them. Even the corners are similarly rounded in comparison. Both devices include their physical buttons on the right-hand side. The thing is, the Pixel 8 Pro has its power/lock key above the volume up and down buttons. It’s the other way around for the ASUS ZenFone 11 Ultra.

If we flip them around, you’ll get to see considerably different backplates. The Pixel 8 Pro has a camera visor on the back, which stretches from the frame on the left to the frame on the right side. It does protrude quite a bit, but it balances the phone on the table, so it doesn’t wobble. The ZenFone 11 Ultra has its camera island in the top-left corner. It’s considerably smaller than what the Pixel 8 Pro offers.

The two smartphones are very similar in terms of dimensions. The Pixel 8 Pro is barely shorter, for about 1mm, while they’re almost identical in terms of width and thickness. It’s worth saying that the ZenFone 11 Ultra does weigh a bit more than the Pixel 8 Pro. It weighs 224 grams compared to 213 grams of the Pixel 8 Pro. Both smartphones are water and dust-resistant (IP68 certification), and both of them do leave a premium feeling when you use them. They are, however, quite slippery, as they’re made out of metal and glass.

Google Pixel 8 Pro vs ASUS ZenFone 11 Ultra: Display

There is a 6.7-inch display included on the Pixel 8 Pro. It has a resolution of 2992 x 1344, and it’s an LTPO OLED panel. It’s flat, and it has an adaptive refresh rate of up to 120Hz. HDR10+ content is supported on this panel, and the brightness goes up to 2,400 nits. The display aspect ratio is 20:9, while the Gorilla Glass Victus 2 protects this panel. The screen-to-body ratio is around 87%.

Google Pixel 8 Pro Review AM AH 11
Google Pixel 8 Pro

The ASUS ZenFone 11 Ultra features a 6.78-inch fullHD+ (2400 x 1080) LTPO AMOLED display. That panel is also flat, and it has an adaptive refresh rate of up to 144Hz. HDR10 content is supported here, while the display goes up to 2,500 nits of brightness at its peak. The display aspect ratio is 20:9, while the screen-to-body ratio is around 88%. The Gorilla Glass Victus 2 protects this display.

You’ll be glad to know that both of these displays are more than good enough. They’re both sharp enough, though the Pixel 8 Pro’s panel is sharper. The refresh rates are quite high, and well-optimized, while the displays are vibrant. They have good viewing angles, and the blacks are deep. The touch response is quite good, and both panels are well-protected. They also get quite bright when needed. There’s really not much to complain about here. One thing to note is that The ZenFone 11 Ultra won’t use a 144Hz refresh rate other than in some compatible games. You’ll get up to a 120Hz refresh rate during general usage.

Google Pixel 8 Pro vs ASUS ZenFone 11 Ultra: Performance

The Google Tensor G3 fuels the Pixel 8 Pro. The phone is also equipped with 12GB of LPDDR5X RAM, and UFS 3.1 flash storage. The ASUS ZenFone 11 Ultra comes with the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chip, along with up to 16GB of LPDDR5X RAM, and UFS 4.0 flash storage. Looking at the performance-related specs alone, the ASUS ZenFone 11 Ultra does have the edge. It has a more powerful processor, along with faster storage. The thing is, the Tensor G3 is really well-optimized for the Pixel 8 Pro, and it does bring along a bunch of AI features.

The general performance is great on both sides. They both open apps really fast, and can multitask like nobody’s business. Browsing, multimedia consumption, taking pictures, messaging, emails, and anything else you can imagine runs fine on both. Do note that the ZenFone 11 Ultra is snappier if you compare them directly, though. The difference is not huge, but it’s noticeable. That is not surprising considering the sheer power the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 delivers, plus UFS 4.0 storage. Chances are you’ll be happy with the performance on both sides, though.

When it comes to gaming, both of them can hold their own, but if you’re playing graphically-intensive titles, the ZenFone 11 Ultra will likely be a better choice. It ran Genshin Impact better than the Google Pixel 8 Pro. It didn’t overheat during a 1-hour session or anything like that. Both of them did get quite warm, though, but the performance did not suffer because of it.

Google Pixel 8 Pro vs ASUS ZenFone 11 Ultra: Battery

The Pixel 8 Pro has a 5,050mAh battery on the inside. The ZenFone 11 Ultra delivers a 5,500mAh unit. ASUS’ flagship did a better job in our battery drain test. The difference was not huge, but it did do a better job. The same goes for general usage, actually. During our testing, we were able to get more battery juice from the ZenFone 11 Ultra, though the difference was not as big as some of you may expect.

Getting over 7-7.5 hours of screen-on-time was doable, while the Pixel 8 Pro was also able to get up to 7 almost every time. The battery life was more consistent on the ZenFone 11 Ultra, as the Pixel 8 Pro had off days when getting to 6.5 hours of screen-on-time was a bit of a struggle. Do note that gaming was not a part of our usage on those days. Everything else was, though, pretty much.

The Pixel 8 Pro supports 30W wired, 23W wireless, and 5W reverse wireless charging. The ZenFone 11 Ultra, on the flip side, supports 65W wired, 15W wireless, and 10W reverse wired charging. Using wired charging, the Pixel took 1 hour and 19 minutes to fully charge. The ZenFone 11 Ultra can technically fully charge in about 40 minutes if you have the appropriate charger for it. Neither smartphone comes with a charger in the box.

Google Pixel 8 Pro vs ASUS ZenFone 11 Ultra: Cameras

The Pixel 8 Pro features a 50-megapixel main camera, a 48-megapixel ultrawide camera (126-degree FoV), and a 48-megapixel telephoto unit (5x optical zoom). ASUS’ handset has a 50-megapixel main camera, a 13-megapixel ultrawide unit (120-degree FoV), and a 32-megapixel telephoto camera (3x optical zoom). Both smartphones do a good job, but we lean towards the Pixel 8 Pro from the photography perspective.

ASUS Zenfone 11 Ultra AM AH 8
ASUS ZenFone 11 Ultra

Google’s flagship prefers more contrasty output than the ZenFone 11 Ultra. Both smartphones do use a lot of processing, though the ZenFone 11 Ultra images do look a bit too oversharpened in some scenes. The Pixel 8 Pro does a better job in that regard. Both phones handle HDR situations with ease, while both provide plenty of details and handle white balance really well. Their ultrawide and telephoto cameras do a good job of keeping up with the color science of the main cameras. The thing is, the results are usually better on the Pixel 8 Pro.

Both phones can hold their own in low light too, and both of them pull quite a bit of detail from the shadows. Overall, the Pixel 8 Pro was a bit more consistent when it comes to low-light performance. Its secondary cameras were also a bit more useful in such conditions than the ones on the ZenFone 11 Ultra. The ZenFone 11 Ultra is still a very capable camera smartphone, though.

Audio

You will find a set of stereo speakers on both of these smartphones. The output from both is good enough. They’re loud enough and also well-balanced. We’ve seen louder speakers on some other flagships this year, though.

The ZenFone 11 Ultra even has an audio jack, that’s something you won’t find on the Pixel 8 Pro. You can always use its Type-C port for wired audio connections, though. The two smartphones support Bluetooth 5.3 and Bluetooth 5.4, respectively.


[ad_2]
Source link

A concerning number of students using AI to write papers

0
[ad_1]

OpenAI launched ChatGPT back in November 2022, prompting Google and other companies to release their generative AI tools. These models have revolutionized many aspects of work and life, and education is no exception. However, the influence of AI isn’t universally beneficial, particularly when it comes to writing papers.

Nearly 11% of papers contain at least 20% contribution of AI

The news comes from Turnitin, a leader in academic integrity for more than 25 years. Their dedicated AI engineering team launched an AI writing detection tool in April 2023, just months after the release of OpenAI’s ChatGPT.

Since then, Turnitin has been conducting an extensive study with the help of its AI writing detection tool with over 200 million papers submitted by students. They have been looking for the use of AI in the papers that are considered to be at least one of the parameters that represent how wise a student is.

Notably, the result they got is surprising, to say the least. Approximately 11% of the 200 million papers (over 22 million) from students contain at least 20% contribution of AI models. Approximately 3% (over 6 million) of papers contained at least 80% contribution of AI.

Furthermore, Turnitin also shared another recent study conducted by Tyton Partners. According to their survey, nearly half of the students are using generative AI tools, such as ChatGPT on a regular basis. Notably, 75 percent of the students surveyed said that they will continue to use AI tools even if their institutions ban them.

There needs to be open discussions about the fair use of this technology

“We’re at an important juncture in education where technologies are transforming learning, and the need for academic integrity is more critical than ever,” said Annie Chechitelli, chief product officer of Turnitin. She also noted that their AI writing detection feature should help in finding instances where students have unfairly used AI to write their papers.

Nonetheless, the successful detection of AI-written papers isn’t a complete solution. As Turnitin suggests, there needs to be open discussions about the fair use of the technology. AI has a lot of potential to revolutionize education in a more positive way. Students can use AI to find, summarize, and translate information from another language faster and easier than ever.


[ad_2]
Source link

Spotify may soon launch its lossless audio feature

0
[ad_1]

After years of anticipation, Spotify may soon launch its long-awaited lossless audio feature. Recent discoveries suggest the streaming giant is preparing to offer high-fidelity audio as an optional add-on for existing subscribers. This move would bring Spotify in line with services like Apple Music, Tidal, and Amazon Music HD, which already offer lossless audio.

Lossless audio offers a higher level of detail and clarity than standard compressed formats like MP3. It aims to replicate the quality of the original studio recording, preserving subtle nuances that might be lost in lower-quality formats.

Spotify may launch “Music Pro” add-on

Spotify first announced plans for Spotify HiFi in February 2021, promising CD-quality lossless audio launching sometime that same year. However, fans have been kept waiting as the feature wasn’t released.

According to Reddit user Hypixely, Spotify may be developing a lossless audio feature called “Music Pro.” This feature will arrive as an add-on to existing plans, rather than a standalone subscription tier. It would include advanced remixing tools, allowing users to customize songs with TikTok-style creativity. Additionally, the feature could optimize audio output for specific headphones, enhancing the overall listening experience.

Music Pro could also expand upon past AI features, offering even smarter playlists and personalized insights into your music habits. Overall, Music Pro seems designed to appeal to both power users and casual listeners, providing exciting new ways to interact with music.

A welcome addition, but questions remain

The arrival of lossless audio would be welcomed by audiophiles who value the highest quality listening experience. While the rumors suggest this could soon be a reality, uncertainties remain. For instance, the potential cost of “Music Pro” is unclear, as is the full range of features it might offer beyond lossless audio. Additionally, Spotify has not officially confirmed the existence or launch date of “Music Pro.”

Hopefully, users won’t have to wait much longer to experience their favorite tunes in crystal-clear, high-fidelity sound on Spotify.


[ad_2]
Source link

Threads is shutting down in Turkey due to privacy concerns

0
[ad_1]

Meta’s messaging social app Threads will shut down in Turkey starting this month. According to the company, it does not comply with local privacy regulations. The Turkish Competition Authority (TCA) took issue with the way Threads automatically links users’ data to their Instagram profiles.

Threads launched last summer as Meta’s attempt to capitalize on growing interest in more private social networking. But it was too tightly integrated with Instagram. Setting up a Threads profile required an Instagram account, and deleting one also deleted the other by default. This raised obvious privacy concerns by forcing a data connection without options.

Meta will shut down Threads for Turkey on April 29

In response to regulators, Meta has since added options to separate the two profiles. But it seems that these changes came too late for the Turkish authorities. As of April 29, Threads will be temporarily blocked in the country, according to the latest order from the TCA. Notifications are informing millions of users to either delete or deactivate their profiles before then.

“To comply with an interim order of the Rekabet Kurumu/Turkish Competition Authority (TCA),” Meta writes on the blog. “We will shut down Threads in Turkey from Monday 29 April. We know this will be very disappointing for the many people in Turkey who engage on Threads with their community.”

This is the latest privacy battle between Meta and Turkish authorities. In 2022, Meta was fined $18.6 million in Turkey for combining user data across Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp. It also faces cumulative daily fines of $160,000 for failing to comply with previous data-sharing orders.

Meta also says it is taking steps to minimize any disruption. However, the shutdown highlights Meta’s ongoing struggle to balance data usage policies across regions. While its popularity remains high, aggressive integration also brings increased scrutiny. In this matter, you can read our guide on how to deactivate your Threads account.


[ad_2]
Source link

Google Chat working on adding group audio and video call function within Gmail Spaces

0
[ad_1]

Google Chat, which is part of Google Workspace, is not exactly one of the leading chat applications out there. However, it is popular in workplaces and businesses where Google Apps are highly used, justifying continued development and improvement of the app. To that end, there may soon be updates that will allow for easy audio and video calls directly within group Spaces, giving the app more functionality to those that make it part of their daily workflow.
This info comes from a tip shared exclusively with PiunikaWeb by AssembleDebug, who found the feature hidden in Gmail version 2024.04.07.622678535. From the screenshots, it looks like Google is planning to add two new icons to the top bar of a Space: one for audio calls and one for video calls. To avoid accidental calls, you’ll likely have to confirm your intent to start the call with all group members after clicking either icon. Also, it appears that the “Active Threads” icon may get a visual refresh, changing from a message icon to a thread icon.

Images credit: PiunikaWeb

This upcoming feature aims to make communication easier for project groups and teams using Google Chat Spaces. Currently, initiating a group call in Google Chat involves the extra task of generating and sending a Google Meet link. The new direct call feature, however, will remove this additional step, leading to a more efficient workflow.

While the feature is not yet available, it is evident from the code that Google is actively working on it. Hopefully, this new call feature will be integrated into the standalone Google Chat app, and not be limited to just Gmail. Furthermore, a window offering “Suggested apps to enhance your space” may soon appear at the top of Spaces, suggesting useful integrations with other Google Apps for even more productivity, sort of how Gemini currently does it.


[ad_2]
Source link

Enhancing Team Coordination With Open-Source Tools

0
[ad_1]

In the rapidly evolving work environment of today, collaborative scheduling stands out as a foundational pillar for effective team dynamics. With teams often distributed across different time zones and work arrangements varying from remote to hybrid models, the need for a cohesive system to manage time and tasks is more pronounced than ever.

Collaborative scheduling tools serve as the glue that holds the diverse pieces of a project together, ensuring that everyone is on the same page and deadlines are met with ease. These tools not only simplify the logistics of scheduling meetings and assigning tasks but also bolster the team’s ability to work as a unified entity despite geographical and temporal barriers.

The Impact of Collaborative Scheduling Tools on Team Efficiency

Task Organization and Meeting Management

Imagine a digital board where every team member can see, add, or adjust tasks and meeting times. This visibility eliminates the confusion about who is doing what and when. It reduces the time spent in back-and-forth emails trying to find a suitable time for everyone. By having a centralized platform, teams can efficiently allocate resources and prioritize tasks based on urgency and importance.

Fostering a Culture of Collaboration

These tools provide a shared space where team members can openly discuss their availability, workload, and progress on tasks. This openness encourages a sense of responsibility and accountability among team members, as their contributions and efforts are visible to everyone. It builds trust within the team, as members understand their roles and how they contribute to the team’s objectives.

This transparent environment also facilitates quick identification and resolution of potential work hindrances, as team members can collectively strategize on solutions, leveraging diverse perspectives for better outcomes.

Enhancing Productivity

Improved scheduling through collaborative tools significantly enhances team productivity. By providing an overview of everyone’s tasks and availability, these tools help in identifying the best times for collaborative work and meetings, ensuring that they do not disrupt individual work periods. Moreover, by automating the scheduling of recurring tasks and meetings, these tools free up time that can be better spent on high-priority tasks.

Benefits of Open Source Collaborative Scheduling Tools

Adaptability and Customization

Unlike proprietary software that may come with rigid features, open-source tools can be tailored to fit the specific workflow needs of any team. This means that whether a team is working on software development, marketing campaigns, or project management, the tool can be customized to accommodate its unique processes and methodologies.

Such flexibility ensures that the tool enhances, rather than disrupts, the team’s workflow, making collaboration seamless and more efficient. The ability to modify features also means that as a team’s needs evolve, the tool can evolve with them, providing a long-term solution to team scheduling software needs.

Cost-Effective Solutions

Unlike many proprietary tools that come with high subscription fees, open-source tools are generally available at no cost. This makes them particularly appealing to smaller teams or organizations with limited budgets. The key aspects that make open-source tools so attractive in terms of cost-efficiency include:

  • Zero Purchase Price: The hallmark of open-source software is its lack of a purchase price, making it freely available for anyone to download, install, and use. This feature is particularly beneficial for small to medium-sized teams looking to minimize operational expenses. By eliminating the upfront costs associated with acquiring software, these teams can allocate their limited resources more effectively, ensuring that essential functions are performed without financial strain.
  • Reduced Dependence on Vendors: One of the most liberating aspects of open-source tools is the reduced reliance on vendor support and proprietary ecosystems. This autonomy not only saves money on vendor support packages, which can be prohibitively expensive but also empowers teams to tailor the software to their specific requirements. The ability to modify and extend the functionality of open-source software without waiting for vendor updates or enhancements can significantly accelerate innovation and productivity within organizations.

For teams looking to maximize their resources without sacrificing functionality, open-source scheduling software offers a viable and attractive option.

Leveraging Community Support

The community-driven nature of open-source software is one of its greatest strengths. These communities, composed of users and developers, are constantly working on improving the software’s features, fixing bugs, and enhancing security.

This collective effort ensures that open-source collaborative scheduling tools are continuously evolving and improving, often at a faster pace than proprietary tools. The community also serves as a valuable resource for troubleshooting and knowledge sharing, making it easier for teams to implement and maximize the use of their scheduling tools.

Ensuring Flexibility

Since the open-source software for collaboration can be customized, teams can modify it to accommodate new project requirements or changes in team structure. This adaptability ensures that teams can remain agile and responsive to change. Additionally, the open nature of the software means that it can be integrated with other tools and platforms, further enhancing its flexibility and making it a powerful component of a team’s collaborative tools arsenal.

Selecting the Right Open-Source Scheduling Tool for Your Team

Considering User-Friendliness

A tool that is complicated or unintuitive can lead to resistance among team members, undermining its potential benefits. Therefore, prioritize tools with a straightforward setup process, clear instructions, and an engaging user interface. Look for features like drag-and-drop functionality, customizable views, and easy-to-understand dashboards. A user-friendly scheduling platform encourages quicker adoption, minimizes frustration, and allows your team to reap the benefits of collaborative scheduling tools without a steep learning curve.

Evaluating the Tool’s Integration Capabilities

Finally, it’s crucial to consider how well the open-source scheduling system integrates with the software and tools your team already uses. Seamless integration with email platforms, project management software, and communication tools can significantly enhance workflow efficiency. It eliminates the need for manual data entry between systems, reducing the risk of errors and saving time. A tool that fits well within your existing technology ecosystem will streamline processes and contribute to a more cohesive digital work environment.

Customizing Open-Source Scheduling Tools for Enhanced Collaboration

Incorporating Feedback

Incorporating feedback from team members is crucial when customizing an open-source scheduling application. This collaborative approach ensures that the tool is refined to meet the needs and preferences of all users, ultimately facilitating smoother and more effective team coordination. Here’s how:

  • Conduct Surveys or Meetings: Regularly gather feedback through surveys or meetings to understand team members’ experiences and suggestions for improvement.
  • Identify Common Themes: Look for recurring feedback themes that indicate areas of the tool that are particularly beneficial or need enhancement.
  • Prioritize Changes: Based on the feedback, prioritize customization efforts that will have the most significant impact on efficiency and user satisfaction.
  • Implement Gradually: Make changes gradually to avoid overwhelming users and to test the effectiveness of each customization.
  • Solicit Continuous Feedback: After implementing open source software for team changes, continue to seek feedback to ensure the customizations are meeting team needs and to identify further areas for improvement.

By engaging team members in the customization process, you can create a more tailored and effective scheduling tool. This not only boosts productivity but also fosters a sense of ownership among team members, encouraging them to fully utilize the tool in their daily workflows.

Utilizing Plugins and Extensions

These add-ons can introduce new features or enhance existing ones, such as integrating with external calendars, automating task assignments, or providing more detailed analytics. By exploring and incorporating relevant plugins and extensions, you can further customize the tool to meet the specific demands of your projects. It’s important to select add-ons that are well-supported and regularly updated, ensuring they add value without compromising the tool’s stability or security.

Ensuring Scalability

As your team grows and project requirements change, your open-source scheduling platform must be able to scale accordingly. Customizing the tool should involve not only current needs but also an anticipation of future demands. This means choosing a tool with a flexible architecture that can handle increased users, more complex projects, and higher data volumes. Scalability ensures that the tool remains efficient as your team evolves, supporting not just current collaboration needs but also future expansion and complexity.

The strategic implementation and effective use of open-source collaborative scheduling tools stand as a testament to their value in enhancing team coordination. As teams look to the future, these tools will remain essential in navigating the complexities of project management and team collaboration, continuously evolving to meet the changing demands of the work environment.

  1. Software Support: 7 Essential Reasons You Can’t Overlook
  2. 6 Best Ways to Make a Collaborative PowerPoint Presentation
  3. Employee Engagement And The Psychology Of Team Dynamics
  4. How Collaboration Across Platforms Supercharge AI Performance
  5. Collaboration Across Platforms Could Supercharge AI Performance

[ad_2]
Source link

Not just a pretty face

0
[ad_1]

Being based in the US, I’ve basically been walking around with a blindfold over my eyes. And, who tied that blindfold? Samsung and Apple. I’d been conditioned to think that luxury phones could only be had for a luxury price, and that may have been true half a decade ago. However, the blindfold has long since been removed, and I’ve finally seen the beauty that is phones from overseas. I had the opportunity to review the Infinix Note 40 Pro+.

This is a phone from China-based Infinix, and I’ve reviewed other phones from similar companies. The closest equivalent is Tecno, as both of these companies are owned by Transsion. Phones from these companies have redefined my definition of a sub-$400 phone. All of the phones I’ve reviewed from Tecno and Infinix (with the exception of the Tecno Phantom V Flip) sit comfortably under the $300 mark, and it really shocked me just how incredible these phones can be for their prices.

Having reviewed a fair amount of these phones, I thought I’d know what to expect when I opened this box. Well, I was right… and I was wrong. Is this a good or a bad thing? Let’s find out in this review of the Infinix Note 40 Pro+.

Table of contents

Infinix Note 40 Pro+ Review: Design

There are certain aspects of this phone that stick out, and the design is one of them. It’s a massive departure from the design we saw with last year’s Infinix Note 30 Pro. That phone had a more eclectic aesthetic with its boxy design and pearlescent glass back; a beauty and beast wrapped up in one package.

Infinix Note 40 Pro+ (3)

This year, Infinix did a hard pivot to a completely different design category. The Infinix Note 40 Pro+ added a curved display, faux leather back, thin frame, and an overall luxurious aesthetic. I’m not going to mince words, this phone is a piece of art! It reminds me of the kinds of phones you get when companies partner with designer brands. It looks like Infinix partnered with a company like Louis Vuitton or Gucci to pull off this look. Looking at it, you’d think that this phone cost someone $1,200.

I got the green and gold colorway for this phone, and it looks gorgeous. The thing I like about this colorway is that the colors are muted a bit. So, this gives it sort of an understated beauty. Though, I would have liked it if the gold was a little more saturated.

On the back of the phone, it’s clear that the large square camera package is one of the defining features of Infinix phones. It doesn’t look bad, but to be honest, it’s a little bit off-putting. The rest of the phone is sleek and elegant. However, you turn the phone over, and you see this large and not-very-sleek block right at the top of the phone.

The Infinix Note 30 Pro also had a large square camera package, but it made sense for that phone, as it went along with the phone’s blocky aesthetic more. In the case of the Infinix Note 40 Pro+, it clashes with the overall look. I wouldn’t say it’s destructive to the look; it’s a way to keep Infinix’s identity through iterations.

Overall, however, for as dashing and debonair as this phone is, the camera package doesn’t take away from the overall look. I give it a pass because it’s a minor bother at best. Overall, I praise Infinix for developing such a gorgeous phone. It’s the kind of phone you’d want to show off.

Infinix Note 40 Pro+ Review: Build quality

When it comes to the build quality, I’m a little bit torn. Like many phones in this price range, the Infinix Note 40 Pro+ looks more expensive than it is; well, it looks more expensive than it feels as well. It doesn’t feel bad per se, and I can tell that Infinix put effort into making it feel as good as it could. However, the phone feels rather light and plasticy compared to how it looks.

Does it feel cheap? Well, it feels on the cheap side, but I wouldn’t say “cheap.” I don’t feel like I just got scammed on Wish. However, I can tell that there was a lot of plastic used in the design, and that does a lot to contribute to a cheaper feel.

When you look at the back of the phone, for instance, it looks like you’re about to grab some luxurious leather… but then you touch textured plastic. The frame of the phone is made from glossy plastic, and you’ll feel that when you grip it.

That being said, I think that the build quality overall is solid. I know that the company had to cut costs with the materials it used, but the phone’s construction is another story. I think that Infinix did a good job putting the Infinix Note 40 Pro+ together. When I applied a bit of force to the phone from the front and back, I didn’t hear any creaks or pops coming from it.

Infinix Note 40 Pro+ (5)

Aside from the cheaper feeling in the hand, there isn’t anything that I can complain about with the Infinix Note 40 Pro+. It’s affordable, so the feeling is to be expected, so I won’t dock points. Not only is this a mid-range phone, but it’s also not made by a financial behemoth like Samsung or Apple. These companies have the money to stack their affordable phones with metal frames and glass backs. Infinix is a smaller brand, and it’s done a great job regardless.

Infinix Note 40 Pro+ Review: Display

One thing that the Infinix Note 30 Pro, Tecno Camon 20 Pro/Premier, Tecno Pova 6 Pro, and Tecno Phantom V Flip have in common is that they all have absolutely jaw-dropping displays. Looking at them, I find myself wondering if they all secretly cost double their price. Since all of these phones are from Transsion-owned companies, I’m sure that they’re all using similar OLED panels and calibration. Well, I’m happy to report that Infinix didn’t rock the boat with the Note 40 Pro+.

Brightness

Have you ever dealt with a problem for years, got a solution to that problem, and looked back on the problem and asked yourself “How did I ever deal with that problem in the first place?!” That’s the story with bad display brightness. Even the more expensive phones from back in the day had displays that basically disappeared in the sunlight. As much as I like my reflection, I don’t want to see it while trying to look at my phone’s screen.

However, expensive phone screens have gotten brighter, and cheaper phones have followed suit. They’re not going to get up to the eye-blazing 2,400+ nits that we see with more expensive iPhones, Galaxy phones, and Pixel phones. But, the fact of the matter is that you don’t need displays THAT bright to be able to text your friend or watch a video outside.

I’d say that the aforementioned phones are at the point where they’re bright enough to be viewed comfortably outside. Well, the Infinix Note 40 Pro+ is right up with those devices and a bit brighter. It peaks at 1,300 nits of brightness, which is 400 nits brighter than the Infinix Note 30 Pro (44% brighter).

When I take this phone outside, I’m able to see everything just fine. It doesn’t matter if I’m gaming, texting, or scrolling social media, I can see the screen perfectly fine. It’s not as bright as a display on an iPhone, Galaxy, or Pixel; I admit that I see my reflection just a bit more on the Infinix than on those phones. However, it’s not an issue at all.

The only issue I have with the brightness is something that I had with the Tecno Pova 6 Pro (Review). When I’m in a darker environment, the Adaptive brightness setting overcompensates and cranks the brightness to its lowest setting. I can see if I’m in a pitch-black room, but this would happen if I’m in a dim room. I’d find myself cranking the brightness up a bit just to see the screen more comfortably.

Colors

If you’ve read my review of the Infinix Note 30 Pro, Tecno Camon 20 Pro/Premier, Tecno Pova 6 Pro, and/or Tecno Phantom V Flip, then you’ll know my affinity for these phones’ displays. One reason for this is the color calibration.

We all know that OLED displays have saturated colors, and we’ve known this for years. However, it’s not just about having punchy colors; there are other factors at play. There are factors like color temperature, color space, etc. This is why displays from different companies look different despite mostly being manufactured by Samsung.

Infinix Note 40 Pro+ (13)

So, I’m not just drooling over these phones’ displays because of the juicy colors. I think that Infinix calibrated the display on the Infinix Note 40 Pro+ to display colors beautifully. The phone comes with the colors set to their most saturated setting out of the box. At their most saturated setting, the colors hit a sweet spot between saturated and over-saturated. They’re notably punchy, and they make everything I’m watching pop.

Even at their least saturated setting, there’s a nice pop of color to the display. You may like this setting if you’re not into super juicy colors.

Extras

When it comes to the extra goodies, there are two things. Firstly, there are the color settings. Under the display settings, you’ll see the Color Style page. Here, you’re able to choose the level of saturation. If you want more muted colors, you can set it. Also, you can adjust the color temperature.

Lastly, this display caps out at a fluid 120Hz refresh rate. This makes all of the UI animations extremely smooth.

Overall

I wasn’t surprised that the Infinix Note 40 Pro+ has a stunning display. It’s one of the best aspects of this device. It only adds to its beauty factor. Picking up this phone and powering on the display is an experience all its own. I mark this as another homerun for Infinix!

Infinix Note 40 Pro+ Review: Speakers

So far, this review has been filled with praise for this phone, but…

Earlier in this review, I mentioned the past phones I reviewed from Tecno and Infinix. I mentioned that these phones are similar in that they offer a high value for their price and that they all have beautiful displays. Well, they’re also similar in that their speakers are mid at best.

The fact of the matter is that there are certain areas where phones like these need to be cut back. It’s the natural order of things. You can’t expect a sub-$300 phone to be great at everything. The age of the “Flagship Killer” has passed, so, corners need to be cut, and the speakers are one of them.

To test these speakers, I used six different test tracks to test out different aspects of the audio. They’re designed to test out the loudness, distortion, bass, treble, vocals, and immersion. I used these pieces along with just using the speakers in my regular usage.

Loudness/distortion

The first test piece I used was this loud rock piece to really push these speakers to their limit, and I wasn’t let down by the loudness. At their peak loudness, they were louder than I’d need for any inside scenario. There are phones that I’d have to have pushed to their highest volume to comfortably hear. This was one of the few complaints that I had about the Galaxy S24+’s speakers. I put a sound meter one foot from the phone at its highest volume, and it peaked at 87dB.

Infinix Note 40 Pro+ (10)

The speakers get plenty loud, and they did get a bit distorted. However, I wouldn’t call it bad. I’ve heard less distortion from phones like the Moto G Power – 2024. So, in terms of loudness and distortion, I’d say that these speakers do a good job. Unfortunately, this is where the good qualities mostly stop.

Bass

This is an area where all of the aforementioned Transsion phones fall short. And, by “short,” I mean about 12 miles behind. These speakers are about as thin and dry as a sheet of paper. The test piece that I played puts a ton of emphasis on low-end audio, so there’s a ton of bass in the piece. However, you wouldn’t know it if you listen to these speakers.

Listening to the piece, I can hear the lower instruments, the sound of them is projecting. However, there’s no depth to the audio. It’s as if someone took an EQ and cut all of the levels below 200Hz.

I will say that these speakers seem to do a slightly better job than some of the other Transsion phones. Maybe there’s a bit more of a rumble, but it’s not really noticeable if you’re not comparing these phones side-by-side.

Treble

This surprised me just a bit because the aforementioned Transsion phones usually perform nicely with higher-end audio. I usually say that they’re great for ASMR content. However, I feel that the speakers in the Infinix Note 40 Pro+ took a step backward.

When it comes to the treble, an important thing to listen for is clarity. I wanted the higher tones to project clearly, but that wasn’t what I was really getting. The higher tones in the test piece I listened to seemed to blend into the rest of the audio just a bit. Rather than coming out crisp and clear, they just started distorting the audio prematurely.

Balance

In terms of the overall balance, the audio sounds a bit lopsided. While there’s slightly more low-end compared to the aforementioned phones, the treble is still stronger. So, when I listened to the test piece, the higher-end audio seemed to take over the sound.

Vocals

Next up, I tested how good these speakers are at reproducing voices. The vocal performance is important especially if you’re going to be listening to songs with vocal tracks. I don’t want to say that this phone is bad at reproducing vocals, but I wouldn’t say that it’s great. Voices seem to blend in with the rest of the sound. So, you can’t really hear the specific texture of the singers’ voices, and that adds a lot to the listening experience.

Overall immersion

The last test piece was a section of a lush orchestral piece that would be played in a movie. It’s the kind of warm and encompassing piece of music, but the speakers on the Infinix Note 40 Pro+ just didn’t convey that. The sound overall sounded flat.

Overall

I’m not going to mince words, the speakers on the Infinix Note 40 Pro+ just aren’t anything to write home about. Sure, they get plenty loud, and they do a nice job of keeping the distortion down, but the other aspects of what makes a good set of speakers just aren’t there. You’re not going to want to get this phone for its speakers.

I was able to help the sound out a bit with the DTS Sound integration. In the Sound settings, you’ll see a DTS Sound section. Here, you’ll have Dolby Atmos-like controls that will give you different sound modes. There are the Smart, Music, Game, and Video modes. Each mode is optimized for each type of media, and the Smart mode will automatically detect the media and optimize the sound accordingly. You have the option to boost the vocals, bass, and treble in each mode, as well. However, boosting the bass doesn’t seem to do anything.

You also have a 5-band EQ that you can use to adjust the audio. You can adjust each band between -5dB and +5dB. The bands are 100Hz, 300Hz, 1kHz, 3kHz, and 10kHz. Adjusting the EQ helped a little bit, but the audio still remains sub-par.

Am I upset? No. The speakers are a part of the phone experience, so I have to factor this into my final verdict, but I understand why it has to be that way. Sometimes, mid-range companies have a harder job than premium companies. When Samsung launches the latest and greatest flagship phone, it’s a no-brainer; it’s going to have the highest-quality tech.

Infinix Note 40 Pro+ (1)

For mid-range companies, it’s a juggling act. They have to balance premium features with the right amount of compromises in order to create the optimal experience. They have to choose which parts of the smartphone experience are the best to prioritize and which ones to let fall by the wayside. If they implement too many compromises, they risk creating a poor experience; if they add too few, then they risk jacking up the price.

The speaker quality is just one part of the smartphone experience that the company just had to leave on the back burner.

Infinix Note 40 Pro+ Review: Camera

We’ve reached a point with camera tech where modern-day mid-rangers are starting to approach flagship phones of the past. So, phones as cheap as these are able to produce some pleasing results when taking pictures. Back in the day, a reviewer reviewing a $400 phone would say “You’d get passable results in GREAT lighting, but that’s it.”

Nowadays, things are a bit better for mid-range shooters, and they’re able to produce results that actually look good. I think that the Infinix Note 40 Pro+ falls behind some of the best phones from Tecno and Infinix. That title belongs to the Tecno Phantom V Flip (Review). While that’s the case, this camera was still able to bring some respectable performance.

Exposure/contrast

When it comes to the exposure, I don’t really have any complaints; it’s pretty balanced overall. There are some shots that I feel leaned a bit bright while some leaned a bit dark. I did see some blown-out highlights in brighter scenes. Overall, however, I think that the shots are exposed pretty nicely.

Infinix Note 40 Pro+ Camera sample (11)

When it comes to contrast, I’ve definitely seen better. Some shots actually had nice crisp shadows like this shot of the rocks.

Infinix Note 40 Pro+ Camera sample (17)

However, there are some shots, like this one of the grass, that have this weird and washed-out quality. It almost looks like what you get if you’re editing a photo, and you crank the highlights level to its lowest point. There are bright and dark spots, but it has a weird quality. However, that doesn’t seem to affect all of the shots.

Infinix Note 40 Pro+ Camera sample (8)

When it comes to the shadows, this phone tends to crush them just a bit. There are spots in the shadows that fall into blackness. The image of these trees shows some spots where the shadows take over.

Infinix Note 40 Pro+ Camera sample (15)

Colors

I’ve probably used this term a dozen times in my reviews, but I’d classify these colors as “Responsibly Saturated.” There’s a satisfying pop of color with the pictures, but they don’t go overboard. In fact, they seem a bit toned down compared to other phones. Some phones punch the colors to infinity to make the photos pop more, but it seems that Infinix focused more on balancing the colors rather than pushing them.

I feel that the color that pops the most in the pictures is green. In all of the images of green grass and leaves, the greens stand out the most. There are some shots that I feel that the greens dip into the cartoonish territory. In this shot of the trees, some of the trees pop a little too much.

 

Infinix Note 40 Pro+ Camera sample (9)

However, this isn’t true for all of the pictures. In this shot of the Moses-in-the-cradles, I think that the camera did a good job of balancing the greens and violets. It was taken mid-day, so the more neutral color temperature is pretty accurate.

Infinix Note 40 Pro+ Camera sample (14)

Video

So, remember when I said that mid-range phones are starting to get as good as older flagship phones? Well… I should have put an asterisk at the end of that statement. Video continues to be an Achilles heel of affordable smartphones, and the Infinix Note 40 Pro+ isn’t shifting any paradigms here.

The video performance isn’t the greatest. There are two resolutions to choose from, and those are 1080p and 2K. 1080p gives you the option between 30fps and 60fps, 2K only has 30fps. Also, you only get video stabilization with 1080p 30fps.

The output isn’t all that bad; the colors are a little toned down compared to most of the pictures and the contrast crushes the shadows a bit more. In 1080p, you can see the typical pixelation that makes the footage look a little blurry. However, it looks like the phone added some additional sharpening to the footage.

There was a noticeable boost to the resolution when switching to the 2K mode, but it retains the toned-down colors and contrast, so it looks sharper without looking any better.

It’s a bit disappointing that the stabilization is only on the 1080p 30fps setting. The video is decently stabilized, but it doesn’t look great with the lower resolution.

Overall

The camera on the Infinix Note 40 Pro+ is a decent performer. There were some shots that weren’t all that great, but there were definitely shots that really stood out. Video is a weak point, but that was pretty much to be expected.

Infinix Note 40 Pro+ (4)

The thing about these photos is that they’re processed to look the best when viewed on the phone’s screen. When viewing the images on other screens, they look okay, but when viewing them on the phone’s screen, they look amazing. This is especially true for the videos; the display picks up where the video falls short. It adds the extra contrast and color saturation.

I think that the camera isn’t one of the strongest points of this phone, but it’s not one of the weakest.

Infinix Note 40 Pro+ Review: Performance

It pains me to remember the dog days when any phone under $400 was a stuttery mess that would barely work. Well, that’s no longer the case. The cheaper mid-range processors have gotten much more powerful, and they’ve been able to catch up to the software they’re running.

Nowadays, there aren’t many sub-$400 phones I review with bad performance. The Infinix Note 30 Pro was able to glide through its software without many issues, and that’s much the same story with the Infinix Note 40 Pro+. This phone has gotten an upgrade from the MediaTek Helio G99 from last year to the MediaTek Dimensity 7020.

While using this phone. I didn’t run into any major performance issues. Generally navigating the software and using the phone is an overall smooth experience. I can tell that Infinix properly optimized the software to run on the chip.

When it comes to the thermals, this phone comes with a large vapor chamber that keeps it cool during intense usage. Thus, it doesn’t get as hot as quickly as other phones that I’ve reviewed. When phones heat up, they start to throttle, but it takes a bit of time before this phone even starts to heat up.

Render test

I, unfortunately, wasn’t able to get proper Geekbench or 3DMark scores for this phone. However, I did a test where I rendered a one-minute video in 1080p resolution in CapCut. Here at Android Headlines, we all render the same video and record how long the process is.

 

Infinix Note 40 Pro+ (12)

Many of the lower-powered phones take around 30 seconds to render it while several premium phones can have it done in under 15 seconds. The Infinix Note 40 Pro+ was able to tackle the video in 25 seconds. That’s a little on the slow side, but it’s still better than most of the other mid-rangers.

Overall

Being a mid-range SoC, I can’t say that the Dimensity 7020 isn’t weak in some areas of processing; however, it just doesn’t show in a user-facing way. This phone is a snappy performer that stays cool during use. It’s able to maintain its 120Hz refresh rate throughout.

Infinix Note 40 Pro+ Review: Gaming

Yes, I’m about to reference sub-$400 phones from back in the day again. However, they’re a good benchmark to let us know just how far we’ve come with mid-range technology. Just half a decade ago, you wouldn’t even dream of doing any top-tier gaming on a phone that didn’t sport the latest silicon; this stigma exists today.

But, there are phones out there that strive to set the record straight. I’ve been impressed with the gaming chops of many of the sub-$400 phones I’ve been reviewing. They’ve been throwing blows harder than I would have imagined, and this is with some of the most graphically intensive games on the market.

The Infinix Note 40 Pro+ was able to handle 2D games flawlessly. I tested it with games like Survivor.io, which is a game that’s not shy about having hundreds of sprites on the screen. It had no issues at all with that game.

When it came to mid-range games, the story is much the same. These are games that are still very pretty-looking while not being the most graphically intensive. I used Sky: Children of The Light, Asphalt 9, and Dragon Ball Legends.

Infinix Note 40 Pro+ (14)

The performance on all of these games was smooth as well. It ran the last two games flawlessly, but it did run into the occasional stutter with Sky. The stutters were few and far apart. So, this means that the Infinix Note 40 Pro+ can comfortably tackle the majority of the games on the Google Play Store and the Palm Store.

Top-tier games

You knew this was coming. I spent the 47GB of storage space to install Genshin Impact and Honkai Star Rail. These are games that will truly test a phone’s mantle.

Starting off with Star Rail, I tested this game at its highest graphical settings, and the phone was able to do an admirable job. When the game starts up and during battles, the phone is likely to drop some frames here and there, but it’s more than playable. The frame rate hovers between 15fps and 20fps, which isn’t great, but it’s not slow and laggy. And again, this is at its highest graphical settings. Bumping them down a bit will smooth out the gameplay without degrading the graphics too much.

Moving on to Genshin Impact, I was able to get some better results. At its highest graphical settings, it was able to run smoother overall. It didn’t quite hit 60fps, but it was still pretty smooth all the same. When running through towns, the frame rate took a bit of a dip, but it didn’t render the game stuttery. It was still pretty smooth. Again, you can bump the graphics down a little to smooth out the gameplay even more. Genshin runs so smoothly that you probably won’t need to knock all of the graphical settings down; you can just disable the motion blur.

Overall

Sure, I said to bump the graphics down for smoother gameplay, but you have to remember that I’m talking about games with near PS3/Xbox 360-level graphics on a sub-$400 smartphone. If you’re picking up this phone, and you’re doubting its gaming capabilities, you shouldn’t. The Infinix Note 40 Pro+ is able to tackle most of the games on the Play Store without breaking a sweat. It’s even powerful enough to handle some of the most graphically intensive games out there without many issues. This is one of the areas where this phone shines.

Infinix Note 40 Pro+ (15)

Infinix Note 40 Pro+ Review: Battery

The Infinix Note 30 Pro was a bit of a beefy fella, so it was no surprise that it held a large 5,000mAh battery. This time around, however, it appears that Infinix had to tighten the phone’s belt and stack it with a smaller battery. The company shed 8% off of the battery capacity.

Be that as it may, the Infinix Note 40 Pro+ was still able to endure rather nicely. To test this battery, I charged it to 100% and ran a looping video until it died. The phone lasted 11 hours and 9 minutes. That’s about half as long as some of the top flagship phones on the market like the Galaxy S24 Ultra and the iPhone 15 Pro.

While that’s the case, it’s still able to get you through the day with moderate usage. If you charge it to 100% in the morning, you’ll be able to last into the second day with some battery in the tank. This was with some gaming, social media scrolling, video-watching, and light camera usage.

Charging

The charging is a bit of a weird topic. I was sent a 100W fast charger. However, it was a European charging brick, so I wasn’t able to charge it using its full capacity. However, I used a 68W charger, and it was able to charge the phone in under an hour.

One of the most interesting additions was a wireless charger. This is a MagPad. It’s a small wireless charger that charges the phone with 20W of power. What’s neat about it is the fact that it can attach to the back of the MagSafe case that comes with the phone. It connects to the phone, but the attraction isn’t all that strong.

Infinix Note 40 Pro+ (16)

Sub-zero charging

One thing that differentiates the Infinix Note 40 Pro+ from most other phones is the fact that it can actually charge at extremely cold temperatures. I tested charging this phone after spending 40 minutes in the freezer, and it was able to charge just fine.

Infinix Note 40 Pro+ Review: Software

The software on the Infinix Note 40 Pro+ is pretty much the same across all of the Transsion phones that I reviewed. It uses XOS running on Android 14. This is a heavily skinned version of Android that offers a ton of customization features.

The software is a fresh take on Android, and I’ve grown accustomed to it over the year I’ve been using similar software. The only gripe that I have is the fact that the Quick Settings and the notifications are kept separate.

You swipe down on the top left side of the screen to access your notifications. To access your Quick settings, you swipe down on the right side of the screen. Also, you can swipe left and right between the sections. That’s not a big problem, but I’d prefer to be able to access both in one swipe.

Infinix Note 40 Pro+ Review: Final verdict

This is the kind of thing that we’ve been missing from bigger smartphone makers like Samsung and Google; new phones that actually feel new. The next Galaxy S phone or Pixel tends to feel exactly like the last, and the same thing goes for iPhones. However, we’ve missed the thrill and excitement of seeing new phones that breathe new life into the franchise year over year.

Infinix Note 40 Pro+ (11)

This is what is happening with the affordable smartphone market. There’s very little that ties the Infinix Note 40 Pro+ to last year’s phone visually, and that makes me happy as a techie. Infinix adopted a completely new design philosophy with its phone, and we haven’t seen that happen with Samsung in years.

Not only is this phone different, but it improves over last year’s handset in the performance and display brightness departments. I’m able to run the most graphically intensive games on the market with relative smoothness.

The camera performance is decent, though it could be better in spots, and the speakers are a lateral move from last year’s model. Those are the main gripes that I have on the phone.

However, Infinix managed to successfully juggle the right amount of strengths and compromises in order to create an overall great package. The Infinix Note 40 Pro+ is more than just a pretty face, and I recommend that you pick it up.


[ad_2]
Source link

Roku was hit by a massive cyberattack

0
[ad_1]

Cyberattacks come in all different shapes and sizes, and they affect several types of companies. Over the past couple of months, Roku has been dealing with a massive cyberattack that has affected more than half a million subscribers. The company is still picking up the pieces after the attack, and it is informing customers who may have been affected.

This is a pretty big deal for the company as it has been dealing with another cyberattack that happened not too long ago. At the beginning of March, the company had to tell 15,000 of its users that their accounts may have been compromised. The threat actor used a tactic called “Credential Stuffing” to gain access to the accounts. This is when an attacker uses credentials from one person’s account and attempts to log into other accounts that may share those credentials.

Roku is going through a massive cybersecurity attack

As if things couldn’t get any worse, the company notified its users about a secondary wave of attacks. In this secondary attack, the company concluded that more than 576,000 accounts fell victim. That’s no small number, even though it pales in comparison to the 80 million subscribers that Roku has.

While the attack affected many accounts, Roku confirmed that the login credentials did not come from it. The threat actors were able to affect Roku accounts, however, this was not the result of threat actors hacking into Roku’s databases and stealing credentials. That doesn’t make the situation much better, but it takes some of the heat off of Roku.

Of the hundreds of thousands of affected accounts, around 400 accounts were, unfortunately, negatively affected. According to the report, within those 400 accounts, threat actors were able to log in and make purchases through Roku. So, these users lost money because of this attack. Be that as it may, Roku assured its users that the threat actors were not able to gain access to sensitive information from these accounts such as full credit card numbers.

In response to this, Roku has reset the passwords for all of the users affected, and it enabled mandatory two-factor authentication. Because of this attack, all accounts must use two-factor authentication.


[ad_2]
Source link

Pixel Watch users may soon get an easy way to sync app permissions between their phone and watch

0
[ad_1]
Pixel Watch users are likely to be getting a smoother watch experience because Google is preparing a convenient new feature. Recent updates to the Pixel Watch companion app have hinted at upcoming support for automatic syncing of app permissions between your phone and your smartwatch.

App permissions normally let apps access different parts of your phone or watch, like your contacts, location, or camera. While managing permissions is important for privacy and security, dealing with them on both your phone and watch separately can be a bit of a hassle.

Google appears to be addressing this. A hidden switch uncovered in recent versions of the Pixel Watch app allows automatic syncing of app permissions, as reported by the Google News Telegram channel and corroborated by Android code expert Mishaal Rahman. Once enabled, your watch will mirror the permissions you’ve carefully set on your phone.

Image Credit: Google News Telegram channel

This hidden feature has been lurking in the background of the companion app’s code. If activated, it reveals a new “Sync permissions from phone” setting. The description is super clear about its function: “Give your watch the same app permissions that you’ve allowed on this phone.” While currently not accessible to regular users, this switch made its first appearance in Android 14 QPR1 Beta 2, as spotted by Rahman at the time.While there’s no concrete release date attached to this feature just yet, its presence in the code is a strong sign that Google is actively working on it. It might roll out with an upcoming Pixel Watch companion app update, or it could be tucked away until a larger Android update, perhaps the Android 15 public release later this year or in one of the Android 15 public betas. This new permission syncing feature is a small but significant quality-of-life improvement. It means you won’t have to painstakingly adjust app permissions on your Pixel Watch. As a Pixel Watch owner, I appreciate the streamlining of this process, as it makes using my smartwatch that much smoother.

[ad_2]
Source link

Hacker Customize LockBit Ransomware to Attack Orgs Worldwide

0
[ad_1]

Cybersecurity researchers at Kaspersky have uncovered evidence that cybercriminal groups are customizing the virulent LockBit 3.0 ransomware for targeted attacks against organizations worldwide.

This allows the threat actors to tailor the malware for maximum impact and effectiveness against specific targets.

The findings come from the researcher’s analysis of the leaked LockBit 3.0 builder, which first surfaced on underground forums in 2022.

This builder enables criminals to generate customized versions of the ransomware by configuring options like network spreading capabilities and defenses to disable.

“The leaked builder has significantly simplified the process of creating tailored ransomware variants,” stated Dmitry Bestuzhev, Director of Kaspersky’s Global Research and Analysis Team. “This opens up a new level of danger, especially if the attackers can obtain privileged credentials within the targeted network.”

Customized Attack Leaves Trail of Destruction

In one alarming incident response case, investigators found that the attackers had managed to steal plain text administrator credentials.

They then used the LockBit builder to generate a customized ransomware variant capable of spreading rapidly across the network using these stolen privileges.

LockBit builder files

The customized malware killed Windows Defender protections and erased event logs to cover its tracks before encrypting data across the compromised systems. Bestuzhev called it “a precision strike intended to maximize damage and cripple the victim.”

Researchers have identified similar customized LockBit attacks across Russia, Italy, Guinea-Bissau, and Chile in recent months. While most relied on default or slightly modified configurations, the incident involving stolen credentials demonstrates the potential devastation.

Custom configuration

“We expect this trend to accelerate as more threat groups obtain access to the LockBit builder,” warned Bestuzhev. “Tailoring malware for specific targets makes attacks exponentially more potent.”

Calls for Increased Defensive Measures

The findings have cybersecurity experts urging organizations to enhance their defensive posture and incident response preparedness radically. Implementing multi-factor authentication, promptly installing patches, and maintaining strict credential hygiene policies are critical.

“The ability for criminals to customize ransomware strains to bypass existing protections is a gamechanger,” said Emily Pycroft, CEO of CyberSec Consultants in London. “Defending against these advanced threats requires a new mindset and proactive measures.”

As LockBit 3.0 continues spreading, the cybersecurity community is bracing for an escalation in high-impact, targeted ransomware attacks tailored to punch holes through organizational defenses. Rapid action may be necessary to stay ahead of the evolving threat.

Indicators of compromise

Host-based:

  • 8138f1af1dc51cde924aa2360f12d650
  • decd6b94792a22119e1b5a1ed99e8961

Network-based:

  • update.centos-yum[.]com (199.231.211[.]19)

Looking to Safeguard Your Company from Advanced Cyber Threats? Deploy TrustNet to Your Radar ASAP.


[ad_2]
Source link