Stability AI opens up Stable Diffusion 3 API to developers

0
[ad_1]

Stability AI has announced expanded access for developers to its next-generation text-to-image generator, Stable Diffusion 3, with the release of the latest API for developers. This move underscores the company’s commitment to open-source generative AI, with plans to release the model weights for self-hosting in the near future.

According to The Verge, Stable Diffusion 3 uses an architecture called the Multimodal Diffusion Transformer. This architecture allows the model to effectively combine textual input with its visual understanding, resulting in more realistic and coherent image generation.

Powerful text-to-image generation now within reach for developers

Previously available only through limited channels, Stable Diffusion 3 is now widely accessible through Stability AI’s Developer Platform API. This grants developers the ability to integrate the powerful model into their applications. Stable Diffusion 3 has received praise for its exceptional performance over similar models, particularly in its ability to accurately translate text prompts into high-quality images.

Stability AI’s press release highlights the model’s strengths in three key areas: typography, adherence to prompt, and text comprehension. These allow developers to create images that precisely match their descriptions, even when those descriptions include intricate elements like specific fonts or styles. Stability AI even claims that Stable Diffusion 3 equals or outperforms other leading text-to-image generators like OpenAI’s DALL-E 3 and Midjourney v6 in these areas.

A new “Stable Assistant Beta” platform is also coming

In addition to the API release, Stability AI has introduced Stable Assistant Beta, a new platform designed to streamline content creation. Described as a “friendly chatbot,” Stable Assistant Beta allows paying subscribers to interact with Stable Diffusion 3 and other AI models conversationally. Users can simply describe their desired image, request written content, or even have the model find matching text descriptions for existing photos.

Overall, the release of Stable Diffusion 3 through the Developer Platform API is a significant development in the field of generative AI. By empowering developers with access to this powerful new model, Stability AI unlocks the potential for groundbreaking applications that push the boundaries of creative expression.


[ad_2]
Source link

Google Messages will now let you record a selfie GIF, but not everyone has it yet

0
[ad_1]
Google Messages is getting a fun upgrade with the rollout of three-second Selfie GIFs. This new feature lets you inject a bit more personality and visual flair into your conversations, but unfortunately, it hasn’t rolled out widely yet.
Unfortunately, it doesn’t look like the feature has reached many users yet. I am currently on the latest version of the Google Messages beta and also running Android 15 Beta 1 (I like to live on the wild side) and I am not seeing this feature activated for me yet. This suggests that the rollout could be server-wide or simply one of those rare features that rolls out in the stable version of messages before it does in the beta.

In either case, in its instructions, Google outlines the process in these simple steps:

  1. Open up a conversation in Google Messages.
  2. Long-press the camera icon located in the text field.
  3. You may also see a prompt within the conversation suggesting you record a selfie GIF. If you see that prompt, tap it.
  4. Get ready, as you’ll have a short countdown before the recording magically starts and stops. Want more control? Tap the red button to manually start the recording, with the option to restart if needed.
  5. Once you’ve captured your three-second selfie GIF, it will be automatically saved to your camera roll for easy sharing.

Selfie GIF taking process | Image via TheSpAndroid.blogspot.com

If you’re a Google Messages user, keep an eye out for the Selfie GIF feature landing on your device soon. And once it does, get ready to add some animated fun to your chats.


[ad_2]
Source link

Google Maps gets new features EV owners will love

0
[ad_1]

Needless to say, we’re seeing more and more electric vehicles (EVs) on the roads these days. That is especially true for the US. Well, Google has decided to add some new features to Google Maps, that EV owners will love. That goes for both Android and iOS apps , and the web client. Google Search is also a part of the equation, though. More on that later.

One of the new Google Maps EV features are AI-powered summaries

These new features will help you find EV chargers on your journey so that you can plan ahead. Google says that, in the coming months, it’ll “start showing AI-powered summaries in Google Maps that describe a charger’s specific location based on helpful information from user reviews”.

Why is this important? Well, finding an EV charger is not always an easy job. It can be located in a specific part of a multilevel parking lot or something like that. This way, you’ll know exactly where to look for it.

Google Maps AI summaries

Google says that this is possible thanks to millions of reviews that users leave on Google Maps on a daily basis. That way, Google will be able to summarize the information for you to consume.

Google Maps charging station reviews

The company will also help you find the right charger for your vehicle

Google will also help you find the right charger for your vehicle. Google says that if you’re low on charge while on the road, you’ll be able to see nearby chargers on the in-car map. It will contain information including real-time port availability and charging speed. It’s also coming in the coming months, globally.

Google Maps nearby EV chargers

On top of all that, Google will show you suggested charging stops, forecasted energy consumption, and more. Last year, Google Maps started showing the best charging locations for vehicles with Google built-in. Now that is expanding to multi-stop trips. You can plan a multi-stop trip, and you’ll be able to see the suggested chargers along the way. This is also coming to everyone in the coming months.

Google Maps charging for multi stop trips

The company will also include an EV filter in Google Travel

Google will also include an EV filter on google.com/travel. That way, you’ll be able to find hotels that offer onsite EV charging, making your trips a lot less stressful, as you won’t need to hunt for chargers.


[ad_2]
Source link

Some iPhone users in the EU can now download apps from websites

0
[ad_1]

Earlier in March, Apple released the iOS 17.4 version with support for sideloading apps, in compliance with the EU’s new Digital Markets Act (DMA). The update allowed iPhone users to install apps from alternative app marketplaces. Now, the company has released the iOS 17.5 beta 2 update. It allows developers to distribute their apps over the web as well.

iOS 17.5 beta users in the EU can now download apps directly from websites

The iPhone users in the EU running the iOS 17.5 beta 2 update can download apps directly from websites. This sideloading of apps on the iPhones is on top of the third-party app stores. So, iPhone users in the EU don’t need to go through the App Store or any other store to install apps. They can directly visit the qualified developer’s website to download their applications.

After pressing the install button on a website, the iPhone users will see a system sheet. It will show the app name, developer name, description of the app, and relevant screenshots. While installing they will need to grant permission for that developer to install apps. It’s worth mentioning that apps sideloaded from websites can also be backed up, restored, and updated, just like the App Store.

As of now, only iPhone users are allowed to download and install apps from the websites. Downloading apps from websites isn’t yet available on the iPads. Also, this functionality is limited for users in the European Union, not anywhere else in the world. The new feature will be available to all iPhone users in the EU with the stable iOS 17.5 update soon.

Developers need to meet specific criteria to offer their apps via websites

It’s worth noting that not all developers will be able to distribute their apps directly from websites. Only these apps that were downloaded more than one million times in the EU in the prior year are eligible. Also, the apps to be offered from the websites must go through Apple’s notarization process.

In addition, the app developers are required to be members of the Apple Developer Program for at least two continuous years. Thanks to the new policy, the developers will not be required to pay up to a 30 percent App Store fee. However, they will still need to pay for a Core Technology Fee of €0.5.


[ad_2]
Source link

Xiid SealedTunnel: Unfazed by Yet Another Critical Firewall Vulnerability (CVE-2024-3400) – Latest Hacking News

0
[ad_1]

Zero Knowledge Networking vendor shrugs off firewall flaw

In the wake of the recent disclosure of a critical vulnerability (CVE-2024-3400) affecting a leading firewall solution, Xiid Corporation reminds organizations that Xiid SealedTunnel customers remain secure. This latest vulnerability, currently unpatched and rated 10/10 on the CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System), highlights the limitations of traditional security approaches.

Xiid SealedTunnel, the world’s first and only Zero Knowledge Networking (ZKN) solution, goes beyond Zero Trust architecture. Unlike today’s firewalls susceptible to zero-day exploits because of their break-and-inspect approach and the inevitable use of “smart” detection techniques that can and do fail, SealedTunnel is inherently resilient by design.

“This is a great example of why complex firewalls become their own security risk. Keep your firewalls simple, and just have them block all inbound access,” said Josh Herr, Head of Deployment and Integration at Xiid Corp. “Xiid SealedTunnel takes a fundamentally different approach. Our ZKN architecture ensures that data remains completely private and never exposed, even in the face of unknown threats.”

Xiid’s ZKN technology leverages the power of Zero Knowledge Proofs, allowing users to verify access rights without ever revealing sensitive information. This eliminates attack surfaces and renders data unreadable to unauthorized parties, even if a network breach occurs.

About Xiid Corporation

Xiid Corporation is a leading cybersecurity provider specializing in Zero Knowledge Networking solutions. Xiid’s flagship product, SealedTunnel, empowers organizations to achieve unparalleled security and privacy through a revolutionary approach that goes beyond traditional firewalls and zero-trust models. www.xiid.com

 

Contact

CEO

Steve Visconti

Xiid Corporation

[email protected]

7753382174


[ad_2]
Source link

Release date, specs, prices & more

0
[ad_1]

Samsung is expected to launch the new Galaxy Watch 7 and its potential variants at the upcoming Unpacked event a little later this year. While the naming scheme, pricing, and really any details about the watch have yet to be confirmed, quite a bit has already been rumored or leaked. And that gives us some information to go on in terms of what to expect from Samsung’s next smartwatch.

Naturally, the Galaxy Watch 7 is thought to be the official name, although it’s always possible Samsung could change things up. As one of Wear OS‘s most popular smartwatch lineups for Android users, the Galaxy Watch series is going to continue gaining plenty of attention. And that doesn’t seem to be stopping with this year’s coming release.

With that said, there are no doubt some changes Samsung could make that would cause the new watch (or watches) to be even more popular. Say, by extending the battery life. If you’re looking forward to the Galaxy Watch 7 and what it has to offer, we’ll be covering everything that’s been rumored or leaked about it in this post. Here’s everything we know so far about the Galaxy Watch 7 series.

This article will be regularly updated with new information on the Galaxy Watch 7 (this is a preview article) — both official teasers and credible leaks, rumors, and insider claims — as it becomes available in the run-up to the release of the upcoming Samsung smartwatch.

When will the Galaxy Watch 7 be released?

There’s no definitive date yet, which makes sense given that Samsung hasn’t announced or even teased the watch. Furthermore, the company hasn’t even said when its next Unpacked would be. However, it’s thought that Unpacked will happen sometime in July this year. So it’s likely that the watch will be released sometime in August, the following month. This is, of course, all speculation. But an upcoming Samsung smartwatch was recently spotted in Bluetooth certification. That suggests that Samsung may be preparing to launch the device within the next few months.

When exactly is still anyone’s guess. But with the Bluetooth certification out of the way, a release probably isn’t too far off, and if Unpacked happens in July, Samsung will no doubt want to release the watch soon after. We can look to the release of the Galaxy Watch 6 series as a potential timeframe.

Samsung launched last year’s watch on August 11. So there’s a good chance it will end up releasing this year’s watch around the same time. It wouldn’t necessarily be on the same day, but it shouldn’t be surprising if the launch falls within the same month.

How many models will there be?

If it’s anything like the last few Galaxy Watch devices, there will be two models. A Classic or Pro version, and a standard version. However, there have been a few rumors stating that Samsung is looking to actually release three models this year. Beyond that, it’s unknown what these models will be. There will most certainly be a standard Galaxy Watch 7. This would be the normal version that is akin to the Galaxy Watch 6. There will also likely be either a Galaxy Watch 7 Classic or a Galaxy Watch 7 Pro. There was also an “Ultra” model rumored at one point.

A Classic model would probably come with a rotating bezel just like the Galaxy Watch 6 Classic did. But if Samsung diverts back to a Pro model instead, then it would probably be like the Galaxy Watch 5 Pro, with a touch bezel. While probably coming with a titanium case for better durability, and longer battery life with a more “adventure” oriented feature set.

The third variant is rumored to have a square shape for the case. It might sound weird given Samsung’s smartwatches have had round cases for many generations now. But Samsung’s earliest iterations of the smartwatch had square cases. Some people prefer these styles, much like Apple Watch enthusiasts do. And because Samsung has made square smartwatches before, bringing one back as a third smartwatch variant for this year’s lineup wouldn’t be out of left field. All it would do is add more variety for consumers. And more variety is rarely a bad thing.

Depending on pricing, it could also add to the presence of consumer choice. As each model might be priced to target specific spending groups.

How much will the Galaxy Watch 7 cost?

Pricing rumors don’t appear to have popped up yet but, we can still make estimated guesses. Based on the cost of past models. Samsung has typically released one right around $300 for the past few years. This pricing would offer the smallest version of the watch and connect to Wi-Fi and Bluetooth only. Samsung will almost certainly release a cellular variant as well. In addition to offering a larger option. Both of these things would alter the price a bit. For the Galaxy Watch 6, bumping up to a 44mm watch from the 40mm took the price from $300 to $330.

Going from Bluetooth/Wi-Fi to LTE but sticking with the 40mm size bumps the price to $350. Choosing both the larger size and the LTE connectivity bumps the price all the way up to $380. Meanwhile, the Galaxy Watch 6 Classic starts at $400 and can go all the way up to $480.

We can probably expect pricing for the upcoming Galaxy Watch 7 series to be very similar. As Samsung hasn’t really changed it much over the past few years. The watch is rumored to get a huge upgrade though. So it is still possible there could be a slight increase in the base cost.

What are the specs?

There have been a few specs rumored or leaked so far, but there’s still plenty that’s unknown. For example, the Galaxy Watch 7 has been rumored to get a huge upgrade. That huge upgrade will allegedly come in the form of a 3nm chipset. It’ll be Samsung’s first smartwatch to use a chipset of this size. It’s said to be about 50% more power efficient than the chipset used in the Galaxy Watch 6 series. On top of that, it’s rumored to come with 32GB of storage.

saftety korea
Image credit: Safety Korea

Both of these things would be very notable upgrades. As more power efficiency would translate to better battery life. Or it should anyway. The storage on the other hand will just give the user more room for stored apps, music, and anything else you might store on a smartwatch. 32GB is quite a lot for a smartwatch, especially compared to the 16GB offered in the Galaxy Watch 6 series. Would you use it all? Who knows. Probably not. But if Samsung does indeed bump it up this much, there must be a reason for it.

As for other specs, nothing has really been rumored as of yet. That includes display size, battery capacity, RAM, and everything else. However, it’s not likely to be long before some more of these details pop up with Unpacked potentially being just a few months away.

What will the design look like?

It’s a pretty safe bet that the design of the Galaxy Watch 7 will be pretty similar to the Galaxy Watch 6. At least for two of the models. If Samsung does release three versions of the watch this year, then one of them is rumored to be the square design that Samsung used in the past. The other two watches should be round and look pretty similar to the current models. One of them will also likely have a rotating bezel, with both of them having two side buttons for various functions.

They should also be using the new latch system for the bands that Samsung introduced with the Galaxy Watch 6 series. If you missed this, the Galaxy Watch 6 introduced new bands that have a button on the underside that you press down on to latch and unlatch the band to the watch lugs. As opposed to the traditional style where you pull on a little pin.

Additionally, expect a clean left side with no buttons unless Samsung decides to add some new features that make use of these. But if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it, and that seems to be Samsung’s mantra with the design seeing as it’s been the same for basically forever.

How many colors will there be?

The Samsung Galaxy Watch 7 is likely to come in three or four color options when it comes to the watch case itself. The Galaxy Watch 6, for example, is currently available from Samsung in three different colors. The Galaxy Watch 6 Classic comes in two. On the other hand, the Galaxy Watch 5, had four colors, while the Galaxy Watch 5 Pro came in two colors. No colors have been rumored or leaked yet. But you can probably expect Samsung to stick to this format.

Three or four colors for the Galaxy Watch 7. And then two colors for the Galaxy Watch 7 Classic or Pro. As for what the colors will be, expect the familiar. That is to say, probably silver, black, and gold versions of the Galaxy Watch 7. Whereas the Galaxy Watch 7 Classic or Pro may come in Silver and Black only. Samsung may change this up a bit by swapping colors. But it has typically stuck to three or four colors for the standard model watch and two colors for the fancier model.

Should you buy a Galaxy Watch 6 or wait for the Galaxy Watch 7?

This is most certainly a question some people are asking themselves. And you may be asking yourself this very question too. Should you buy the Galaxy Watch 6, or wait for Samsung to release the Galaxy Watch 7? That all depends on a few things. The Galaxy Watch 6 series devices are currently on sale from Samsung. At least for some of the variations. There may also be more sales closer to the Galaxy Watch 7 release.

So one thing to consider is whether you want to pick up a great smartwatch at a discount or not. Samsung may have promos on the new watch coming up. But pricing is surely going to be higher than the Galaxy Watch 6. So you could end up saving money by going with it over the upcoming model. However, the Galaxy Watch 7 will surely come with some new features and if it has better battery efficiency, then it may be worth it to wait and pay the higher price.

There’s also the fact that there’s no clear indication of what the watch will do, what it will look like, or how much it will be. With all of that said it might be best to hold off on a purchase until you have more information on what’s coming. Because then you’ll at least be able to more accurately compare your options.


[ad_2]
Source link

Meta’s LlamaV2 7B model is susceptible to hallucinations

0
[ad_1]

Right now, there are several flavors of large language models on the market from Google, OpenAI, xAI, Anthropic, and so on. One such company is Meta, and it has its LlamaV2 7B language model. Well, a company called Deep Keep did a risk assessment of the LlamaV2 7B language model, and it discovered some concerning facts along with a high tendency to hallucinate.

Deep Keep is a leading provider of AI-native Trust and risk security management (TRiSM). It’s a company dedicated to assessing risks related to AI models. The company’s AI security “safeguards machine learning Pipelines in order to promote unbiased, error-free, secure, and trustworthy AI Solutions.”

The LlamaV2 7B LLM may be highly susceptible to hallucinations

When it comes to these large language models, accuracy and security are extremely important. Many businesses are relying on these large language models to be as accurate and secure as possible. This is why it’s a bit scary that Deep Keep’s assessment is showing some red flags.

The company discovered that LlamaV2 7B is highly susceptible to certain types of attacks including denial of service (DoS), direct prompt injection, indirect prompt injection, and PII (Personal Identifiable Information) leakage.

Prompt injection is when the user gets the LLM to produce unintended responses by manipulating the prompt. A DoS attack is when you get the LLM to use an excessive amount of tokens at once.

LlamaV2 7B is also very susceptible to hallucinations. This is when an LLM seems to fabricate facts that are not grounded in reality. This is a major issue with all AI tools on the market today.

LlamaV2 7B meta risk assessment

The LLM is also moderately susceptible to attacks such as adversarial jailbreaking. It involves tricking the LLM into producing responses that violate Meta’s ethical guidelines. During testing, Deep Keep was able to see that, during such an attack, LlamaV2 7B is less likely to deny certain prompts.

If you’re using this model for any professional uses, you shouldn’t have to switch to something else. However, it’s important to know the risks associated with using it. Hopefully, Meta will be able to deliver improvements before any major attacks.


[ad_2]
Source link

Should you share your location with your partner?

0
[ad_1]

Every relationship has its disagreements. Who takes out the trash and washes the dishes? Who plans the meals and writes out the grocery list? And when is it okay to start tracking one another’s location?  

Location sharing is becoming the norm between romantic partners—50% of people valued location sharing in their relationships, according to recent research from Malwarebytes—and plenty of couples have found ways to track one another’s location, with consent, in a respectful and transparent way.

But, as a cybersecurity, privacy, and identity protection company, Malwarebytes is concerned with risk, and location sharing carries significant risks within many types of relationships.

There are new relationships in which the rules around privacy and sharing are still being agreed upon, old relationships in which power imbalances are deeply entrenched, and, of course, abusive relationships in which non-consensual tracking and surveillance are used as levers of control.

As a company—and not a relationship counselor—Malwarebytes cannot endorse any reasons for location sharing between romantic partners. But Malwarebytes can provide guidance on what safe location sharing looks like, including a requirement for consent.

Importantly, Malwarebytes can also remind readers about one simple, often-forgotten fact in this conversation: You don’t have to engage in location sharing if you do not want to.

It really is as simple as that. Do not agree to location sharing in your relationship if:

  • You are being pressured, coerced, or harassed into sharing your location.
  • You do not trust or feel comfortable sharing your location with your partner.  
  • You do not want to.

As the reasons for location sharing are valid for many couples, the reasons against it are just as valid, too. You have the right to determine the rules in your own relationship, and that includes the digital decisions that impact your feelings of privacy, safety, and trust.

Safety, security, and convenience

According to research conducted last year by Malwarebytes, location tracking among partners is popular in North America—and even more popular amongst younger generations.

When polling more than 1,000 people about their attitudes and behaviors around online privacy and cybersecurity, a full 50% agreed or strongly agreed with the statement that “monitoring my spouse’s/significant other’s online activity and/or location makes me feel they are safer.”

Similarly, 42% agreed or strongly agreed with the statement that “being able to track my spouse’s/significant other’s location when they are away is extremely important to me.” This sentiment was higher amongst Gen Z—49% felt the same way compared to the general population.

As to why location tracking has become so popular, there is little doubt. It’s about safety (or, at least, the feeling of it).

On Reddit, the question of location tracking between partners is frequently posed and is just as frequently answered: “I think it should be fine for safety reasons,” said one user in a the most popular response to a thread.

In writing for the media platform Her Campus, one Pennsylvania State University student said that, if she already shares her location with her friends for safety, “why would I not share it with someone I am involved with romantically?”

For some of the editorial staff at the healthy living brand Poosh, location sharing also provided convenience.  

“If I want to call my boyfriend for something, sometimes I’ll check his location first (if he’s at the office, for example, I won’t call),” wrote Erika Harwood, managing editor. “Or if he tells me he’s on his way home and it seems to be taking unusually long, it’s easier to just check his location and see if he’s stuck in traffic.”

Harwood continued:

“Basically, it all boils down to me trying to eliminate as many phone calls from my day as possible.”

What these explanations all share is purpose and consent. The people featured here have told their partners about location sharing, and they have identified specific reasons to engage in this practice. Because of this, these situations are hardly cause for alarm.

What Malwarebytes hopes to draw attention to, however, are starkly different situations.

Coercion, control, and crisis

Location “sharing” implies two partners who consensually share their locations with one another. But as Malwarebytes discovered last year, location “sharing” isn’t the only activity that some people engage in—it’s also location spying.

According to the same survey last year, 41% of all people admitted to monitoring their partner in some way without their partner’s permission.

That includes 16% of people who non-consensually “tracked my spouse’s/significant other’s location through an app or Bluetooth tracker (like Apple AirTags, Tile, Find My)” and 13% who non-consensually “installed monitoring software/apps on spouse’s/significant other’s devices (e.g., Life360).”

The harms here are obvious.

Non-consensual location tracking in a relationship is a clear invasion of privacy. It puts sensitive information into one partner’s hands without the other partner knowing it, and the nature of the information itself can be used to harass and stalk someone—especially after a breakup.

Non-consensual location tracking is also present in domestic abuse, particularly in instances where one partner is being spied upon with the use of “stalkerware” apps. And while those who deploy these types of invasive apps are not guaranteed to be physically abusive against their partners, several documented cases highlight the risk.

As Danielle Citron, professor of law at UVA, wrote back in 2015 about what she called “cyber stalking apps”:

“A woman fled her abuser who was living in Kansas. Because her abuser had installed a cyber stalking app on her phone, her abuser knew that she had moved to Elgin, Illinois. He tracked her to a shelter and then a friend’s home where he assaulted her and tried to strangle her. In another case, a woman tried to escape her abusive husband, but because he had installed a stalking app on her phone, he was able to track down her and her children. The man murdered his two children. In 2013, a California man, using a spyware app, tracked a woman to her friend’s house and assaulted her.”

These cases may sound extreme, but they should not be ignored. They reveal that it isn’t location sharing itself which is harmful, but rather that harmful relationships will lead to harmful forms of location tracking.

Be sure that, if you do engage in location sharing, it is with someone who you trust, on both of your agreed terms, and in a way that you can turn off the location sharing at any point in the future.

What’s the answer?

Your real-time location is extraordinarily sensitive information, and as such, access to it should be understood as a privilege, not a right. No romantic partner has a “right” to your location just because their previous partners practiced location sharing. No romantic partner should coerce or harass you into location sharing. And no, the refusal to share your location, at any stage of the relationship, is not a “red flag.”

If you do decide to share your location with your partner, be sure to follow these guidelines:

  • Have an open conversation about location sharing with one another. You must obtain consent from your partner if you’re going to share your locations. Spying on your partner’s location without their consent is a breach of trust.
  • Have a reason why you’re engaging in location sharing. Many problems in a relationship will not be solved by location sharing. Have a firm reason why you want to share locations and what value it will provide. If you do not have a good reason, you may not need location sharing at all.
  • Set up rules about location sharing. Location sharing can be enabled on a case-by-case basis for, say, music festivals, vacations, or solo hiking trips. It can also be enabled between partners indefinitely.
  • Check in periodically about whether it is working. Just because you agreed to location sharing a year ago does not mean you cannot revisit the topic. See how location sharing feels and then see if you still want it later in your relationship.

As every couple has its own rules and behaviors for success, there is no single answer to whether you should share your location with your partner. You know your partner—and yourself—best to answer this question. Be safe, whatever option you choose.


We don’t just report on threats—we remove them

Cybersecurity risks should never spread beyond a headline. Keep threats off your devices by downloading Malwarebytes today.


[ad_2]
Source link

Vertical App Drawer for Samsung Galaxy devices confirmed again

0
[ad_1]

Everything indicates that the app drawer on Samsung Galaxy devices will make the switch to vertical scrolling. This is something that fans of the brand have been asking for for a long time, and it could be a reality soon.

The app drawer is that “hub” where all your apps are available. Currently, the vast majority of Android brands use an app drawer with vertical scrolling. However, for one reason or another, Samsung has gone against the grain by using horizontal scrolling. Maybe they do it as one of the ways to differentiate themselves from other Android phones.

A vertical app drawer will be available natively in One UI

For a while, it was possible to set up a vertical app drawer in One UI using Good Lock. This official Samsung app offers several additional customization possibilities in the form of “modules” that you can install. The module that allowed using a vertical app drawer was “Home Up,” but it suddenly lost the option. This happened without any explanation, which left many Galaxy device users unhappy.

Now, a reply from an official “in charge” of Good Lock revealed the reason for the option’s removal. Apparently, it happened because the vertical app drawer will be integrated into the OS in a future update. More specifically, a member of the Good Lock support team said: “Please note that the Home Up vertical list function is currently being prepared for support in the next OS version.”

It may arrive with the One UI 6.1.1 update in July

It’s noteworthy that, previously, another member of the Good Lock support team said something similar. In that case, the reply was even more specific since the One UI 6.1.1 update was explicitly mentioned. This means that the option may be available sooner than expected. If everything goes well, you won’t have to wait for the One UI 7 update based on Android 15 to get it.

That said, perhaps the ideal would have been to keep the option available in the “Home Up” module in the meantime. After all, the One UI 6.1.1 update could arrive with the Galaxy Z Fold 6 and Z Flip 6 in July. This means that users will have to wait at least three months to get the vertical app drawer.


[ad_2]
Source link

Google Drive dark mode for web finally starts rolling out

0
[ad_1]

Google has finally officially announced dark mode for Drive on the web. The app already supported a dark theme on its mobile app counterpart and now it is available for desktops as well. The company started testing the Google Drive dark mode in select regions earlier in March. Now, the much-awaited feature is finally available for all users across the globe.

Google Drive dark mode is finally available on the web

Most of the Google apps for both Android and iOS devices have supported the dark mode for a while now. However, the dark theme isn’t available in the web counterpart of all the Google apps. But now, the users of the Google Drive application will be happy as the dark mode is live on the web. This mode will put less strain on their eyes while using Google Drive on their computers at night.

To enable Google Drive’s dark mode, users will need to click on the Gear icon in the top-right corner of the screen. Then, click on the Settings option in the drop-down menu. Finally, change the appearance settings to “Dark”. Some users are also getting a prompt to change to the new dark mode whenever they open Drive in the browser.

The dark theme only applies to the file view

It’s worth mentioning that the dark theme in Google Drive web only applies to the file view. Once you switch on the dark mode, the background will go completely dark. The menus, file names, tabs, and more will appear gray on top of the black background. The sidebar and search bar are slightly lighter and somewhat gray when compared to the darker inner container.

The Docs, Sheets, Slides, and other files will still appear white when you open them. It is quite similar to what Gmail’s dark theme offers. The contents of an email in the dark mode still appear white.

Google has started rolling out the dark mode for Drive’s web version from April 16. The new feature is being rolled out gradually, so it could take some time to reach all the users. The much-anticipated feature is available for all Google Workspace users, Workspace individual subscribers, and all users with personal Google accounts.


[ad_2]
Source link