India Blockchain Week (IBW) Unveils Diverse Speaker Line-up

0
[ad_1]

India Blockchain Week (IBW), the country’s flagship series of blockchain and Web3 events held in Bangalore from Dec.4-10, is thrilled to announce the speaker lineup for the main IBW Conference.

The conference’s headline speakers include Polygon Co-Founder Sandeep Nailwal, Aptos Co-Founder Mo Shaikh, Ava Labs Founder & CEO Dr. Emin Gün Sirer, TRON Co-Founder Justin Sun, and The Sandbox Co-Founder Sebastien Borget.

Additional notable speakers will be Rene Reinsberg (Co-Founder of Celo) Prabhakar Reddy (Co-Founder of FalconX), Aniket Jindal (Co-Founder of Biconomy), Zhen Yu Young (Co-Founder of Web3Auth), Irene Wu (Head of Strategy at LayerZero), Manish Agarwal (CEO at IndiGG), Dr. Kang Li (Chief Security Officer at Certik), Simon Kim (CEO & Managing Partner at Hashed), Kelvin Koh (Co-Founder & Managing Partner of Spartan) among many others.

India Blockchain Week (IBW) Reveals Exciting Line-up of Speakers: Sandeep Nailwal, Mo Shaikh, Dr. Emin, Justin Sun and More

Taking place at the Sheraton Grand in Bangalore on December 6-7, the IBW’23 Conference will have 100+ innovators, entrepreneurs, decision-makers and thought leaders across the entire spectrum of the blockchain industry engaged in keynote speeches, panel discussions, fireside chats, and moderated debates. For example:

  • Sandeep Nailwal will engage in a fireside chat, discussing the current progress and future of Polygon 2.0, and sharing insights about the Indian Web3 ecosystem
  • Mo Shaikh will deliver a keynote speech focused on the Move ecosystem and how Aptos enhances scalability and speed to enhance user experience
  • Dr. Emin Gün Sirer will participate in a fireside chat, discussing strategies for fostering Web3 adoption through subnets and Avalanche’s India strategy
  • Justin Sun will have a virtual fireside chat, delving into general crypto trends and offering perspectives on global regulation, stablecoins, and the Tron ecosystem
  • Sebastien Borget, in his keynote speech, will explore the future of the Metaverse and how brands can unlock value in digital worlds and their massive plans for India

“India is taking full advantage of Web3 technology across industries like social media, entertainment, commerce, and open financial systems”, said Mo Shaikh, Co-Founder & CEO of Aptos Labs. “The Aptos India ecosystem, growth and community is already expanding on a daily basis faster than most others. Our global enterprise partners are taking notice of the blend of market maturity and innovation happening across the country. We are dedicated to the expansion of Web3 in India and look forward to Aptos being a catalyst for the decentralized movement.”

Besides the two-day headline conference, the week-long Web3 festival will feature other prime Web3 events such as ETHIndia, Polygon Connect, Polkadot Pulse, FILBangalore and many more. This is a unique opportunity to engage with emerging talent, attract new developers to the blockchain arena, and expand the blockchain ecosystem in India.

“We’re launching India Blockchain Week (IBW) because we see the synergy between India and Blockchain as not just a game-changer, but our collective destiny,” said Tak Lee, CEO of Hashed Emergent, host of the India Blockchain Week (IBW) Conference.

About India Blockchain Week (IBW)

India Blockchain Week (IBW) is a series of blockchain and web3 events, spanning from 4-10 December 2023 across Bangalore, India. IBW is a week-long array of 50+ web3 events, including flagship events such as the headline IBW Conference, ETHIndia, Polygon Connect, Polkadot Pulse, FILBangalore and many other side-events, networking events, workshops, parties etc hosted by Indian & global blockchain industry stakeholders.

The IBW Conference is the two-day headline event anchoring India Blockchain Week (IBW) on 6-7 December 2023 at the Sheraton Grand, Bangalore and hosted by Hashed Emergent – a team and brand dedicated to accelerating the mass adoption of Web3 in India.

For media queries, please contact: Irshad Ahmed, [email protected] 


[ad_2]
Source link

No, Galaxy S20, Note 20, Z Fold 2 & Z Flip won’t get Android 14

0
[ad_1]

Samsung recently threw users into confusion after hinting that the Android 14-based One UI 6.0 update will be available for the Galaxy S20 series, Galaxy Note 20 series, Galaxy Z Flip (LTE), Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and Galaxy Z Fold 2. According to its support policy, none of these devices should be eligible for the big Android OS upgrade. Well, as expected, it was a mistake from the company. It isn’t pushing Android 14 to any of them.

Samsung confirms no Android 14 for Galaxy S20 and more

The confusion arose from a Samsung article detailing how One UI 6.0 will improve the camera experience of Galaxy devices. The company published the article shortly after rolling out the big update to the Galaxy S23 series. It explained new tools and features introduced with the update. Among those are improvements to the Galaxy Enhance-X app, which brings advanced features not available on the stock camera app.

In the footnotes of the article, Samsung listed the devices that will get the improved Galaxy Enhance-X app following the One UI 6.0 update. It included the Galaxy S23 series, Galaxy S22 series, Galaxy S21 series, Galaxy S20 series, Galaxy Note 20 series, Galaxy Z Flip 5, Galaxy Z Fold 5, Galaxy Z Flip 4, Galaxy Z Fold 4, Galaxy Z Flip 3, Galaxy Z Fold 3, Galaxy Z Fold 2, Galaxy Z Flip (LTE), Galaxy Z Flip 5G, Galaxy A54, and Galaxy A53.

Essentially, the list confirmed that these devices are eligible for Android 14. However, we know that the Galaxy S20 series, Galaxy Note 20 series, Galaxy Z Flip (LTE), Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and Galaxy Z Fold 2 are not. All of these phones debuted in 2020 with Android 10 on board. They have received updates to Android 11, Android 12, and Android 13. Samsung only promised three major Android OS updates for them, so they aren’t eligible for Android 14.

The Korean firm has since improved its support policy to include four major Android OS updates for flagships and premium mid-range models, but it doesn’t cover the 2020 Galaxy lineup under the new policy. This means the devices were incorrectly listed in the article. Or maybe it had changed its mind, though there was little hope. Samsung didn’t respond to media requests for clarification on the matter, leaving users in confusion.

It was a mistake on Samsung’s part

Samsung has finally settled this confusion. The company has updated the footnotes to remove the devices ineligible for Android 14. So if you were hoping to get One UI 6.0 on your Galaxy S20, Galaxy Note 20, Galaxy Z Fold 2, or the original Flip, it’s bad news for you. Your phone is done getting major updates. These devices will only get security updates going forward. Those will come at least up to four years after their launch.


[ad_2]
Source link

Apple won’t be the first to use a 2nm processor

0
[ad_1]

Apple was the first company that used a 3nm processor, the Apple A17 Pro. That chip fuels the iPhone 15 Pro series. Having said that, it seems like Apple won’t be the first to use a 2nm processor.

Apple won’t be the first to use a 2nm processor, it seems

This information comes from Revegnus, a tipster. He shared it via X, as a reply to one of his followers. That follower wrote that Apple will be the first to use a 2nm processor, which Revegnus denied.

He said that Apple’s 2nm chip has been delayed. He also added that Android OEMs will be the first to use 2nm technology. As a reminder, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, which launched recently, is a 4nm processor.

3nm Qualcomm & MediaTek flagships expected in Q4 next year

The Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 and Dimensity 9400 will be 3nm processors, and they’re expected to arrive in the fourth quarter of next year. So, we’re in for a wait for 2nm chips, chances are they’re coming in 2025.

Smartphone chips have been outstanding for years now. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 was praised for a reason. Its sheer power and power efficiency at the same time proved its worth over and over again throughout 2023.

The Apple A17 Pro is a truly powerful processor

The Apple A17 Pro showed its muscles, especially in the graphics department. The iPhone 15 Pro series is able to run some console-quality games because of that processor.

So, it remains to be seen what will 2nm processors deliver. We’re expecting even better power efficiency, and, of course, more power at the same time. Chances are we won’t get any concrete information anytime soon, however, as we’re still far away from those chips becoming a reality.

We may start seeing more Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 and Dimensity 9400 rumors towards the end of the year, or early next year, though.


[ad_2]
Source link

Samsung’s Answer to Apple: Affordable Foldables

0
[ad_1]

Rumors about Samsung launching affordable foldable smartphones have been circulating for some time. These rumors have remained unsubstantiated, though, with no actual product releases. However, excitingly, recent reports from reliable sources suggest that Samsung is preparing to release budget-friendly foldable phones in 2024 in anticipation of Apple’s entry into the foldable market in 2025.

Samsung is getting ready to deliver affordable foldables

The foldable smartphone market has been a hotbed of innovation and competition in recent years. With Samsung being one of the pioneers in this space, it seems they are not resting on their laurels. According to insiders, the company is taking a proactive stance to stay ahead of the game.

Rumors of Apple’s potential entry into foldable technology have heightened Samsung’s sense of urgency. Apple has a strong and loyal consumer base. The company’s arrival to the foldable market could disrupt the established dynamics within the foldable smartphone sector.

Samsung’s Preemptive Move

Samsung’s move to release affordable foldables in 2024 can be seen as a strategic response to the looming competition. By doing so, Samsung aims to secure its position as a prominent player in the foldable smartphone market, catering to a wider range of consumers. It’s a bold and calculated move that demonstrates Samsung’s commitment to innovation and adaptability in the ever-evolving tech landscape.

The signs of Apple entering the foldable market have been present for some time. Apple has filed patents related to foldable technology. There have  also been reports of Apple recruiting talent in South Korea with expertise in hinge mechanisms.

In the end, it’s clear that Samsung’s strategy to release affordable foldable devices in 2024 is a pre-emptive strike against Apple’s imminent foray into the foldable market. This move showcases Samsung’s agility and market acumen. It also sets the stage for an exciting rivalry that promises to benefit consumers with a wider range of foldable options.


[ad_2]
Source link

Bottom address bar comes to Google Chrome… for iOS

0
[ad_1]

Google Chrome for iOS is now letting users edit the look of the browser on their device. This editing ability allows users to move the position of the address bar from the top to the bottom of the        page. By letting users do this, Google gives a sense of unison across Safari and Chrome for users of iOS devices.

Some beta testers got to experience or try out this customization feature earlier this year. Now users are getting this customization feature on their Chrome app, and they can use it if they want to. With the roll-out of the iOS 15 version, Apple gave a similar customization ability to its users.

The aim of this upgrade, which first came on the Safari browser from Apple and now on Google Chrome, is to give users the freedom of choice. With this freedom, they can select the area of their screen where they want their address bar to sit. If you are among those iOS users tired of seeing the Chrome address bar at the top of your screen, you can now move it to the bottom.

How to move the address bar on Google Chrome for iOS from the top to bottom part of the interface

If you want to edit the location of the address bar on Google Chrome on your iOS device, there are a few steps to take. The first step involves updating your app via the App Store to make this feature available for usage. Head over to the App Store and install the new update for Google Chrome that is currently rolling out.

Once you’ve installed this update, you can now change the location of the address bar. Simply open the Google Chrome app and as usual the address bar will sit at the top of the interface. Tap and hold down the address bar at the top of the interface and a pop-up will appear.

The options available in the pop-up window are copy link and the new “move address bar to bottom” option. By selecting the new option, you’ll be able to move the location of the address bar to the bottom of the interface. With this change, your Google Chrome for iOS app will bear some design similarities with the Safari app.

Users will also benefit from this change as it’ll make the address bar more accessible. This will be of help to users with short fingers who find it hard to reach the address bar on their 6.8-inch iPhones. Google might also be planning to roll this customization feature out to Android devices in the coming weeks.


[ad_2]
Source link

Hackers Attacking Blockchain Engineers with Novel macOS Malware

0
[ad_1]

The frequency of hackers exploiting macOS flaws varies over time, but Apple continuously releases security updates to patch vulnerabilities. 

While macOS is generally considered more secure than some other operating systems but, it is not immune to exploitation, and hackers may target it, especially if they discover new vulnerabilities.

Recently, cybersecurity researchers at Elastic Security Labs identified that hackers are actively attacking blockchain engineers of a crypto exchange platform with a new macOS malware.

Novel macOS Malware

For initial access and post-exploitation, the breach used custom and open-source tools. It was detected during the analysis of a macOS endpoint involving a Python app disguised as a crypto bot in a Discord direct message.

Document
FREE Webinar

Ensure your Cyber Resiliance with the recent wave of cyber-attacks targeting the financial services sector. Almost 60% respondents not confident to recover fully from a cyber attack.

This activity is linked to DPRK and shares similarities with the Lazarus Group, and security analysts labeled it REF7001 by considering the following elements:-

  • Techniques
  • Infrastructure
  • Certificates
  • Detection rules

Malicious actors posed as blockchain community members on a public Discord, duping an individual into downloading a deceptive ZIP file. The victim mistook it for a crypto arbitrage bot, leading to an initial compromise.

This marked the start of REF7001’s malware sequence, ultimately leading to ‘KANDYKORN”:-

  • Stage 0 (Initial Compromise) – Watcher.py
  • Stage 1 (Dropper) – testSpeed.py and FinderTools
  • Stage 2 (Payload) – .sld and .log – SUGARLOADER
  • Stage 3 (Loader)- Discord (fake) – HLOADER
  • Stage 4 (Payload) – KANDYKORN

Both stage 3 and stage 4 executables share the same encrypted RC4 protocol for C2 communication, using a consistent key. These samples wrap send-and-receive system calls, encrypting data before sending and decrypting before processing.

During initialization, a handshake occurs between the malware and the C2, and if the handshake fails, the attack halts.

The client sends a random number to the C2, which responds with a nonce, and then a challenge is computed by the client and sent to the server.

After the connection, the client shares its ID and awaits server commands. All data exchanged follows a consistent serialization pattern:-

  • Length
  • Payload
  • Return code to track errors

REF7001 involved the adversary obtaining payloads and loaders from the network infrastructure. They distributed the initial malware archive via a Google Drive link in a blockchain Discord server.

Besides this, two C2 servers were detected during the REF7001 analysis, and they are mentioned below:-

  • tp-globa[.]xyz//OdhLca1mLUp/lZ5rZPxWsh/7yZKYQI43S/fP7savDX6c/bfC
  • 23.254.226[.]90

DPRK’s LAZARUS GROUP targets crypto firms for stolen coins to evade sanctions. They trick blockchain engineers on a chat server, promising money but infecting victims who interact.

Protect yourself from vulnerabilities using Patch Manager Plus to patch over 850 third-party applications quickly. Try a free trial to ensure 100% security.


[ad_2]
Source link

Moto G Power 5G (2024) design revealed via renders

0
[ad_1]

The Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024) design has just been revealed thanks to CAD-based renders. These images come from a partnership between @OnLeaks and MySmartPrice, and you can check them out in the gallery below the article.

The Motorola Moto G Power 5G design has been revealed

Four images have been shared, showing us the device from various angles. In addition to that, a video has been shared too. In that video, which is embedded below the article too, you’ll see a phone’s render from all sides.

That being said, the Moto G Power 5G (2024) will feature a flat display. It will also include a display camera hole, and a rather beefy ‘chin’. As you can see, its bottom bezel is considerably thicker than the rest of them.

There are two cameras on the back of the device, and they’re vertically aligned in the top-left corner. Motorola’s logo sits on the back too. All the physical buttons are located on the right-hand side of the phone.

The phone will include a 6.7-inch display

The source claims that the phone will include a 6.7-inch display. Its measurements have also been revealed. The device will measure 167.3 x 76.4 x 8.5mm. These are rough measurements that are based on CAD renders.

When it comes to the phone’s specs, well, we still don’t know what to expect, exactly. The device’s predecessor was truly affordable, and included rather modest specs.

The Moto G Power 5G (2023) came with a 6.5-inch fullHD+ display, which offered a 120Hz refresh rate. The MediaTek Dimensity 930 fuels that device, while the company also utilized 6GB of RAM.

The device included a 50-megapixel main camera, a 2-megapixel depth camera, and a 2-megapixel macro camera. That device included a 5,000mAh battery, and supported 15W wireless charging.

Now, we are expecting some improvements here, but not major ones. It remains to be seen, who knows, perhaps Motorola can surprise us.


[ad_2]
Source link

Disney to gain full ownership of Hulu with Comcast buyout

0
[ad_1]

Disney is acquiring Comcast’s stake in Hulu. The company will pay Comcast at least $8.61 billion to buy its 33 percent stake in the streaming service. The deal, expected to close in 2024, will give Disney full ownership of Hulu.

Hulu will soon be wholly owned by Disney

Hulu was launched in October 2007 as a joint venture between several media and entertainment houses. Following Disney’s acquisition of 21st Century Fox in March 2019 and WarnerMedia’s sale of its 10 percent stake in Hulu back to the company in April 2019, Disney ended up with a 67 percent majority stake in the streaming service. Comcast’s NBCUniversal held the remaining 33 percent stake.

In May 2019, Comcast agreed to cede its control of Hulu to Disney. The two firms reached a deal with a guaranteed floor value of $27.5 billion, “minus the anticipated outstanding capital call contributions payable by NBCU to Disney.” According to that agreement, Disney will have to pay Comcast $8.61 billion to gain full control of Hulu. However, it may end up paying a little more.

Under the appraisal process agreed to by the duo in 2019, they will evaluate the final equity fair value for Hulu as of September 30, 2023. If the final value turns out to be greater than the guaranteed floor value, which is highly likely, Disney will have to pay the difference to Comcast. The media giant says “the timing of the appraisal process is uncertain” but it expects the acquisition to close sometime next year.

“That was just a hypothetical that we picked five years ago because Disney has control of the company,” Comcast CEO Brian Roberts said about the $27.5 billion valuation of Hulu during an investors call in September. “The company is way more valuable today than it was then.” It remains to be seen how much value the streaming service has added in recent years. Hulu hasn’t gained many new subscribers lately, leading to a price hike and a potential password-sharing crackdown from Disney.

Disney may share more details about this acquisition during its earnings call

Disney and Comcast had originally agreed to begin this sale process in January 2024. They were supposed to evaluate the final value for Comcast’s stake in Hulu early next year. However, earlier this year, the firms decided to move the date to September 30. It’s unclear what prompted this change, but the sale is now officially underway. Disney may share more details about it during its earnings call next week. The company will report its earnings results for the fiscal full year and Q4 2023 on November 8.


[ad_2]
Source link

What Gen Z really cares about when it comes to privacy

0
[ad_1]

It would be easy to think that Gen Z doesn’t care about privacy. They worry less about ad tracking, do little to stem the flow of their private information online, and, as Malwarebytes recently uncovered, monitor one another’s lives far more than other generations.

But it isn’t that Gen Z, wholesale, doesn’t care about privacy. It’s that they care about privacy in a different way.

Unlike other generations whose privacy fears are deeply entangled with concerns of traditional cybercrimes like identity and credit card theft, Gen Z worries most about the exposure of their private information because of the chance of harassment, bullying, and lost friendships.

In fact, when it comes to many privacy concerns that have a cybersecurity overlap, Gen Z cares less overall. According to our research, compared to 51 percent of non-Gen Z, 62 percent of Gen Z agreed or strongly agreed with the following statement:

“I’m more worried about my private information being exposed online (e.g., embarrassing/compromising photos/videos, mental health, sexuality, etc.) than I am about typical cybersecurity threats (like viruses, malware etc.).”

As privacy advocates (including Malwarebytes) continue to fight for expanded digital rights amongst all users, it is paramount that we understand how to appeal to a younger generation of future recruits. For Generation Z, that data privacy fight is unlikely to deal with data brokers, Bluetooth trackers, or privacy-invasive web browsers. It is also unlikely to lean on the same concept of “privacy” itself.

Instead, the fight for “privacy” may start from the inverse: The right to control what becomes public.

Losing the fight for traditional online privacy

In October, Malwarebytes published new research into the cybersecurity and online privacy habits of 1,000 respondents in the United States and Canada. Titled “Everyone’s afraid of the internet and no one’s sure what to do about it,” the report reveals that too many people spy on their spouses, too few use unique passwords, and too many who are worried about identity theft don’t actually do anything about it (and to those people, we say: We’ve got you covered).

Deeper inside the data, though, is a depressing, new finding: We have likely lost the fight on traditional online privacy. Online ad tracking and location monitoring—which privacy advocates have lobbied against for years—are of little importance to Gen Z.

A third, or 33 percent, of Gen Z agreed or strongly agreed with the statement “I don’t mind being tracked by websites or apps,” compared with 22 percent of non-Gen Z, and 49 percent of Gen Z agreed or strongly agreed that “Being able to track my spouse’s/significant other’s location when they are away is extremely important to me,” compared with 39 percent of non-Gen Z.

Looking at disagreement with certain statements also shines light on what Gen Z finds acceptable in their own relationships. When asked how they feel about the statement “I think monitoring apps and tools are an invasion of privacy,” fewer Gen Z respondents disagreed than non-Gen Z—18 percent compared to 24 percent—revealing, perhaps, that fewer members of this younger generation will ever stand up against this type of intimate surveillance.

But for all the spying and ad tracking that Gen Z allows, their approach to obtaining consent before posting about other people is, simply put, extraordinary.

When Gen Z shares photos, videos, or information about literally anyone in their lives, they always seek consent for every type of relationship more often than non-Gen Z. More often, Gen Z always seeks consent when posting about their spouse or significant other (39 percent compared to 32 percent non-Gen Z), their close friends (41 percent compared to 32 percent), their children (39 percent compared to 29 percent), other people’s children (41 percent compared to 35 percent), their parents (38 percent compared to 29 percent), other, older family members (34 percent compared to 29 percent), other, younger family members (36 percent compared to 30 percent), and even people they don’t know or don’t know well (32 percent compared to 26 percent).

Here, we see a kernel of an idea for Gen Z privacy, in that what is shown is what matters.

What Gen Z really cares about

Despite the differences discussed above, Gen Z’s privacy “calculus” is quite similar to that of non-Gen Z. Both groups worry about personal information being used in ways that they haven’t agreed to, which can lead to consequences they’ve personally experienced.

Where non-Gen Z worries about identity theft, credit card fraud, data breaches, and good old-fashioned hacking, Gen Z simply can’t be bothered.

A full 86 percent of non-Gen Z are concerned or very concerned about their financial accounts being hacked, compared to 72 percent of Gen Z who feel the same way. Similarly, 85 percent of non-Gen Z are concerned or very concerned about having personal information or data stolen by hackers or thieves, compared to the 74 percent of Gen Z, and 86 percent of non-Gen Z are concerned or very concerned about identity theft or fraud, compared to 69 percent of Gen Z.

Gen Z’s (relative) ease with these threats is understandable—these aren’t even “threats” to them, they’re facts of life. How do you define a “stolen” Social Security Number after the attack on Equifax? How do you spend time worrying about one company’s data breach when hundreds are hacked every year?

Instead, Gen Z worries about being unable to manage the information released about them online, and the potential fallout that could—and in many cases already has—come from it.

This is first visible in the fact that Gen Z is more concerned or very concerned about having their personal struggles shared online (59 percent compared to 57 percent for non-Gen Z), having their sexual orientation exposed online (45 percent compared to 37 percent), and having embarrassing photos, videos, or information posted about them online (61 percent compared to 55 percent).

From that type of exposure, Gen Z then worries more often about interpersonal consequences than non-Gen Z. More than a third, 34 percent, of Gen Z worry about “what my friends/family would think of me” compared to 26 percent of non-Gen Z, and 29 percent worry about “what would happen to my friendships/relationships” compared to 26 percent of non-Gen Z.

More consequentially, 34 percent of Gen Z worry about being physically harmed, compared to 27 percent of non-Gen Z, while 36 percent worry about being bullied, compared to 22 percent of non-Gen Z.

Now, it may be easy to excuse some of these numbers on youth—bullying is more prevalent for students, even if it extends online—but the same fears carry over into the workplace. Again, almost a third of Gen Z, 33 percent, worry about being fired or having a work opportunity taken away because of exposed private information, compared to 29 percent of non-Gen Z.

Buoying many of these fears is the fact that many members of Gen Z have already directly faced these types of events before. Disproportionately, Gen Z deals with more harassment, abuse, blowback, and upset feelings for the things that they and others share about them online than non-Gen Z.

In the research, Malwarebytes asked respondents “Have any of the following consequences ever happened to you because of something you or someone else did or posted online?” Gen Z revealed that:

  • 20 percent have had their confidence hurt because of how they were portrayed (compared to 12 percent of non-Gen Z)
  • 23 percent suffered worsened mental health (compared to 12 percent of non-Gen Z)
  • 18 percent had someone incorrectly assume something about them or their identity (compared to 12 percent of non-Gen Z)
  • 18 percent were stalked or bullied (compared to 9 percent of non-Gen Z)
  • 17 percent lost a friend, significant other, or someone important to them (compared to 8 percent of non-Gen Z)

Amidst all the data, these responses spotlight the largest discrepancies—twice as many Gen Zers have been stalked or bullied because of something posted online, and almost twice as many have lost a close friend or partner.

The response here cannot be blamed.

In the same way that people of all ages are forced to give up sensitive information to participate in modern society—divulging Social Security Numbers on mortgage applications or passport numbers on airline websites when flying internationally—Gen Z grew up in an era where posting on social media was the norm.

Further, the judgement that Gen Z faces online often applies a binary thinking to nuanced issues. With just one Instagram post, TikTok video, or tweet, people are separated into in-groups and out-groups. Jobs can be threatened, friendships can be enflamed.

If privacy is to continue, it must offer something to its youngest participants. Today and in the future, we hope Generation Z can consider that privacy isn’t about having something to hide—it’s about choosing what to broadcast.


[ad_2]
Source link

Huawei is planning to ship 100 million smartphones in 2024

0
[ad_1]

According to a new report, Huawei is planning to ship out 100 million smartphones in 2024. This information comes from The Elec, a Korean publication.

The Huawei Mate 60 series seems to be the main reason behind this decision. The company’s latest flagship smartphones have been quite popular since launch, boosting Huawei’s plans for next year.

Huawei is very optimistic, it’s planning to ship 100 million smartphones in 2024

How does this compare to this year? Well, it’s quite a difference. Huawei expected to ship out 40-50 million smartphones by the end of this year, as things are going now. So its goal for next year is basically to ship twice as many phones as this year.

Just to be clear, this year is also an improvement to the previous one. Huawei is expected a 30-70% boost compared to 2022 in terms of sales.

That being said, while Huawei is expecting to ship out 100 million smartphones next year, several market research companies expect that number to be around 70 million.

The company is still affected by the US ban

As many of you already know, Huawei is still affected by the US ban. The company is still selling a ton of smartphones in its homeland, but its sales abroad are nowhere near where they used to be.

The lack of Google Play Services and access to the Google Play Store managed to do some damage, as did other aspects of the US ban. Still, Huawei is still making outstanding phones, and has developed its own ecosystem of apps. On top of that, it allows you to access app repositories via Petal Search.

Huawei is also making progress in other areas, as it’s working with SMIC to improve the chip situation.

It remains to be seen what will the actual sales numbers be next year, but Huawei is very optimistic. We’re expecting the Huawei P70 series to arrive in 2024, along with the Huawei Mate 70 series, and the Mate X4.


[ad_2]
Source link