Thinking about buying a Galaxy Watch 6 or Galaxy Watch 6 Classic? Well you might want to read on, to find out about this incredible deal from Best Buy.
Best Buy is offering up a $50 gift card, and a free fabric watch band with your purchase. So you’re getting two watch bands with your purchase. Those fabric bands retail for $49.99, so you’re getting a $100 value here.
The Samsung Galaxy Watch 6 is a great smartwatch for anyone who wants to track their health and fitness, stay connected, and control their devices from their wrist. Here are some of the reasons why you should buy the Galaxy Watch 6:
Advanced health tracking: The Galaxy Watch 6 has a variety of sensors that can track your heart rate, sleep, steps, calories burned, and more. It also has an ECG sensor that can detect atrial fibrillation, a serious heart condition.
Long battery life: The Galaxy Watch 6 has a battery that can last up to 40 hours on a single charge. This means you can wear it all day and night without having to worry about it running out of power.
Sleek design: The Galaxy Watch 6 is available in two sizes: 40mm and 44mm. Both sizes have a sleek, minimalist design that looks great on any wrist.
Wear OS 4: The Galaxy Watch 6 runs on Wear OS 4, which is a version of Android designed for smartwatches. This means you can access a variety of apps and features on your watch, including Google Maps, Spotify, and YouTube Music.
Water resistance: The Galaxy Watch 6 is water resistant up to 50 meters, so you can wear it in the shower, pool, or ocean.
Overall, the Galaxy Watch 6 is a great smartwatch that offers a variety of features and benefits. If you’re looking for a way to track your health, stay connected, and control your devices from your wrist, the Galaxy Watch 6 is a great option.
Many of you are probably eagerly awaiting for Apple to announce its new iPhones. Well, a trusted source has just revealed when will that happen, by sharing the iPhone 15 announcement, pre-order and launch dates.
The iPhone 15 announcement date has been revealed, along with pre-order & launch dates
This information comes from Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman, a well-known source for Apple-related info. He claims that the new iPhones will get announced on either September 12 or 13.
Furthermore, he said that pre-orders for them will go live a few days later, on Friday, which is September 15. When it comes to an actual launch, we’re looking at September 22. That’s when the devices will be available to purchase.
It seems like the rumor claiming some delays for the ‘Pro’ iPhones was not accurate. Well, it could still turn out to be accurate if the ‘Pro’ iPhones don’t end up shipping on September 22, of course. We’ll see.
Do note that a report from last week claimed that the new iPhones will launch on September 13. Apparently, some US carriers asked employees not to take the day off on September 13, due to a “major smartphone announcement”.
All iPhone 15 models will offer a Dynamic Island, and a Type-C USB port
All new iPhone 15 models will feature a Dynamic Island, and also a Type-C USB port. Those will be the first iPhones ever to include a Type-C port, by the way. The EU kind of forced Apple to ditch the Lightning port.
That being said, the ‘Pro’ models will stand out. They will not only have noticeably thinner bezels, but will also have better camera setups, and a frame made out of titanium. The Pro Max model will even get a periscope telephoto camera, which is also a first for iPhones.
We’re about a month away from Apple’s launch event at this point. There’s not much left to hide at this point, at least as far as design and hardware features are concerned.
Samsung has received record-breaking pre-orders for its first-gen foldable smartphones in its home country South Korea. According to local reports, the pre-order volume for the Galaxy Z Fold 5 and Galaxy Z Flip 5 has surpassed a million within a week. It’s a record high for folding devices.
Samsung unveiled the new foldables on July 26, alongside the Galaxy Tab S9 series flagship tablets and Galaxy Watch 6 series smartwatches. It immediately opened pre-orders for all of these products in most markets around the world. However, as usual, South Koreans had to wait a little longer. Pre-orders opened in the country on August 1 and ran through August 7 (until August 10 in other markets).
The company has now revealed that the Galaxy Z Fold 5 and Galaxy Z Flip 5 raked in 1.02 million pre-orders during this one week in its homeland. That’s slightly more than the 970,000 pre-orders received by 2022 models. As Samsung’s mobile chief TM Roh estimated recently, the popularity of the Flip model has increased this year. It accounted for 70 percent of all pre-orders, Yonhap News Agency reports. It was a 60-40 split between Galaxy Z Flip 4 and Galaxy Z Fold 4 last year.
Roh also estimated that the sales of Samsung’s foldable smartphones will grow 50 percent globally in 2023. The Korean firm is aiming to sell about 15 million units of the Galaxy Z Fold 5 and Galaxy Z Flip 5 combined, which could mean a 75 percent share in the global market. About 20 million foldables are expected to sell globally this year. Samsung has started well, but only time will tell if it hits the target. Foldables haven’t been able to penetrate the US market, so the company has its task cut out.
You can still pre-order Galaxy Z Fold 5 and Galaxy Z Flip 5
As said earlier, Samsung is still taking pre-orders for the Galaxy Z Fold 5 and Galaxy Z Flip 5 in some other markets. The company offers several benefits to those who pre-order the foldables rather than pick one up after general sales begin on August 11. These benefits vary from market to market, so make sure to check the Korean firm’s official website for your country.
Pre-order benefits in South Korea included a free Galaxy Watch 6 (44mm Bluetooth) with the 1TB Galaxy Z Fold 5, free memory upgrade, free Samsung Care+ for a year, free cases, Samsung Store credits, discounts on Galaxy accessories, and several partner offers such as four months of YouTube Premium, six months of Microsoft 365 Basic, in-game items, and more.
Google seems to be working on a new Nest Wifi model. The folks at 9to5Google spotted multiple references to the unannounced Wi-Fi router in the latest version of the Google Home app (v3.4), which is currently rolling out via the Play Store. Not much information is available about the device itself, though.
According to the publication, the latest update for the Google Home app contains strings related to a Nest Wifi device with the codename “Breeza.” It believes the codename has been misspelled in this instance and should be the Italian word “brezza,” which translates to “breeze.” We have attached the string below.
<string name=”ws_check_wan_breeza_a11y”>The WAN and LAN ports are found behind your Nest Wifi. The WAN port is on the left and the LAN port is on the right.</string>
Separately, the publication found the same device being referred to as “BRZA,” which appears to be a shorthand for Breeza/Brezza. It could also identify the model number GS4VD for the device. From the available evidence, the new model doesn’t have any notable differences from the Nest Wifi Pro, which debuted last fall.
“The Google Home app treats this new model almost exactly as it does the current Nest Wifi Pro,” the report states. However, Google will likely offer something to differentiate the Breeza/Brezza from the existing models in the Nest Wifi lineup. There are a few ways it could do that.
For example, the Nest Wifi Pro brought the latest Wi-Fi 6E technology and Google expectedly bumped the asking price. However, it still lacked support for a Google Assistant speaker in the mesh points, something found in the original Nest Wifi. The company could restore that with the upcoming model, though there are no signs of it yet.
The new Nest Wifi could be a refreshed version of an existing model
Google has a history of relaunching older routers at a reduced price point a few years down the line. The popular Google wifi, which debuted in late 2016, saw a refresh in 2020 with a distinct model code. So it won’t be completely out of bounds if the Breeza/Brezza is a refresh of an existing Nest Wifi model.
Unfortunately, details are scarce, so we can’t say anything for sure. But if Google is planning to release the new device this fall alongside the Piel 8 series, or even in early 2024, we should soon get to know more about it. Meanwhile, you can check out these best Wi-Fi routers for your home internet system.
NFT enthusiasts are getting their wallets drained after clicking on a malicious ad.
Cyber-criminals continue to impersonate brands via well-crafted phishing websites. We previously covered attacks on both consumers and businesses via online searches for popular brands leading to scams or malware.
Digital assets such as cryptocurrencies or NFTs are highly coveted by threat actors due to the high gains that can be made, even via a simple phishing attack.
In this blog post, we investigate a malicious ad on Microsoft Bing for LooksRare, an NFT marketplace. Malvertising is helping scammers to phish users with added credibility but also leaves victims irate about ads and top search engines.
Malicious ads for NFT marketplace
Non-fungible tokens (NFTs) are assets that have been tokenized via a blockchain. Whether you are into them or find them laughable, a lot of money is being invested, making them attractive to criminals. In a post on social media, one user claimed to have lost $300K worth of NFTs because they clicked on a Google ad:
We could not immediately find the same ad on Google, but we did see one on Microsoft Bing that is likely tied to the same campaign:
The “why you’re seeing this ad?” dialog shows the advertiser as being from China and the ad by a company named Fantacy Click Limited:
Microsoft’s Advertiser Identity Verification Program states that when ads don’t pass policy checks, they either stop serving the ads or suspend the advertiser’s account. In this example of brand impersonation, the phishing domain (looksrare-org[.]com) was freshly registered on August 7th 2023. While we can’t expect companies to track every possible brand out there, a simple domain registration check could easily reveal risky advertisers.
Decoy redirect
The threat actor invested minim efforts to deceive crawlers and other automation tools by setting up the usual cloaking page. In this example, you get redirected to an “about us” decoy page:
Unfortunately, while it is easy for humans to see that this site is completely fake, machines will find no security issue and validate it:
Redirect and phishing page
Legitimate users and intended victims clicking on the ad will get a different experience. They are redirected to a second website (www-market-lookshare[.]com) that was also registered very recently and that acts as the phishing site:
This site is a close replica of the official looksrare[.]org domain:
Draining wallets
The phishing site invites victims to connect their wallet by scanning a QR code:
If you are running the Coinbase extension, you will get a request such as the one below:
After connecting to the victim’s wallet, the threat actor will run a few queries and eventually prompt the user to sign a message, granting them access to their NFTs. Someone has analyzed the transactions associated with this campaign in a thread here.
Phishing and crypto assets
Many people have expressed concerns about cryptocurrencies and other digital assets due to how many scams there are, but also because of how easy it can be to lose very large sums of money with just a few wrong clicks.
Phishing sites can be very convincing especially if the user visited them via a paid Google or Bing search ad that they expect has already been verified as legitimate.
There are a number of tools that can help to protect your wallets and gain better visibility over incoming transactions. Malwarebytes Browser Guard can block those phishing websites and malicious ads to keep you out of harm’s way.
We have reported this malicious ad to Microsoft via their low quality ad submission & escalation form. An automated response informed us that Microsoft will review and take action on any ads found to be in violation within 3-5 days. Unfortunately, this gives criminals enough time to run their malvertising campaigns uninterrupted and switch accounts by the time they are caught.
Earlier this year, Spotify unveiled its AI-generated DJ, and it’s a pretty neat idea. While it’s a couple of months old, it’s been in testing for the most part and limited to only a handful of countries. However, Spotify’s DJ is making it to 50 more countries. However, there’s a bit of a catch.
If you don’t know what the DJ is, here’s a quick rundown. Back in February, Spotify started testing a feature that would make it seem like you have your own private DJ. When you access it, you’d hear an AI-generated voice introduce and give commentary on recommended songs. The voice will give introductions tailored to the user, so it’ll feel like you have your own personal DJ.
If this is something that interests you, just know that you need a premium subscription to use it. Spotify Premium costs $10.99/month. This is after the recent price hike that the company went through.
Spotify’s DJ is making it to 50 more countries
When DJ launched, it was for testing, so the launch was limited. It launched in the US and made its way to the UK and Ireland. Now, with this expansion, it’s now available in more countries. This includes countries in Asia, Europe, and Africa. The DJ is also landing in Australia and New Zealand.
There are countries like the Bahamas, Canada, Jamaica, the Philippines, Samoa, South Africa, and Zimbabwe. If you want a complete list, you can check the page here.
Now, what’s the catch?
Spotify’s DJ is great, and it’s great that it’s available in 50 more countries, but that’s only if you can understand it. While it’s making its way into non-English-speaking countries, DJ is only available in English. So, people who don’t speak it are out of luck.
At this point, we don’t know if the company plans on bringing any other languages to the functionality. Hopefully, it does, because it’s a neat feature.
It looks like the first set of leaks for the upcoming 14th Gen Intel CPUs has popped up in the form of some benchmarks. As noted by VideoCardz this appears to be the first leak pertaining to Intel’s upcoming processors, and they indicate an increase in the core count compared to the currently available 13th Gen processors.
The data comes from BAPCo, which showcases CrossMark CPU results for two of Intel’s upcoming 14th Gen processors. The Intel Core i9-14900K and the Intel Core i7-14700K. Based on the benchmark information the new i9 CPU will come with 24 cores up from 16 in its 13th Gen counterpart. While the new i7 CPU gets a bump from 16 cores to 20. Both CPUs were paired up with 16GB of DDR5 RAM and an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 GPU for these tests.
Scores for the tests were based on a variety of categories including productivity, creativity, responsiveness, and overall performance. The i9-14900K CPU obviously comes out on top seeing as it’ll be Intel’s flagship for this new processor generation. Accumulating a maximum score of 1859 in responsiveness, 2550 in creativity, 2180 in productivity, and 2279 overall. The Core i7-14700K meanwhile saw scores at 1562, 2293, 1892, and 1997 respectively. Worth noting is that these are also desktop CPUs.
Intel may officially reveal 14th Gen CPUs in September
It’s unclear when exactly Intel plans to unveil its newest generation of processors. But it seems the company might be planning to announce them at its Intel Innovation event in September. Followed by a full rollout of the products by October. Since these are just benchmark test results there’s no indication of availability or pricing just yet. Both of which are likely to be confirmed by Intel once it announces the new 14th Gen lineup later this year.
If those times are accurate, then consumers looking for a CPU upgrade won’t have to wait a whole lot longer to get into the new hardware. Although you may need to consider other upgrades as well depending on your motherboard. As these new processors are designed for the LGA1700 socket and your board will need to support that.
This kind of program is commonly referred to as stalkerware. As the name suggests, people aren’t doing anything good with this kind of software. You’ll most commonly see it on Android devices, put there by someone with temporary physical access. Depending on the program, it may access phone records, texts, photos, camera, microphone, GPS…you name it, it can possibly do it.
The device owner will have no idea that this is going on, because these programs come with no app icon and stay hidden.
A domestic abuser or someone up to no good generally installs the app on the phone without the victim’s consent or knowledge. Once done, it can be used to keep track of the person for as long as it remains on the device.
In this case, LetMeSpy first made notification of the breach in June, with the following message:
On June 21, 2023, a security incident occurred involving obtaining unauthorized access to the data of website users.
As a result of the attack, the criminals gained access to email addresses, telephone numbers and the content of messages collected on accounts. For 100% clarity: Everything collected from mobile devices where the owner wouldn’t have been aware LeMeSpy was present in the first place.
Given that someone with this app on their phone could potentially be in a perilous position to begin with, it’s even worse that such an individual would have their data stolen in this way. Polish site Niebezpiecznik, which first reported the breach, said that the database dumped online contained:
26,000+ email addresses of the tool’s “operators” along with hashes of their passwords.
16,000+ text messages, including passwords and codes for various services.
Telephone numbers of people who had contacted the tracked phones.
Telephone numbers of the people whom the tracked phone owner had called (along with the names associated with them in the contacts list).
A database dump in SQL format, containing more data, including locations.
A terrible situation, needlessly caused by an app most folks wouldn’t want on their devices.
Well, it seems the breach was a step too far for LetMeSpy too. So much data was deleted that new users are now blocked from creating an account. A permanent shutdown will take place in August. TechCrunch notes that the app is no longer available for download, and currently installed versions seem to be completely dead, as per a network traffic analysis.
A nonprofit transparency collective called DDoSecrets told TechCrunch that the app had been used to steal data from more than 13,000 compromised devices “until recently”. This is quite a bit lower than the 236k devices the LetMeSpy website claimed to be residing on.
We recently covered the LetMeSpy hack on our Lock and Code podcast, asking (among other things) if there’s ever a situation where a hack like this could be considered “good”.
How to prevent spyware and stalkerware-type apps
Set a screen lock on your phone and don’t let anyone else access it
Keep your phone up-to-date. Make sure you’re always on the latest version of your phone’s software.
Use an antivirus on your phone. Malwarebytes for Android shows you exactly what information you’re sharing with each app on Android, so you can keep an eye on your privacy. Malwarebytes detects the LetMeSpy app as Android/Monitor.LetMeSpy.
Coalition Against Stalkerware
Malwarebytes is a founding member of the Coalition Against Stalkerware. We continue to share intelligence with the Coalition Against Stalkerware to improve industry-wide detections while also guiding the domestic abuse support networks within the coalition through thorny, technical questions of detection, removal, and prevention.
We don’t just report on Android security—we provide it
ind The Pixel Fold is Google’s first foldable smartphone, and it’s hard to deny it was inspired by some devices from OPPO. The Pixel Fold adopts a similar form factor to the OPPO Find N2. That’s why we’ll compare the two devices here, the Google Pixel Fold vs OPPO Find N2. Both of these devices adopt a horizontal layout when unfolded. They’re shorter and wider than Samsung’s Galaxy Z Fold phones.
This does mean that the experience of using these devices is different than that of the Galaxy Z Fold series. The thing is, the Pixel Fold and OPPO Find N2 are considerably different devices too, despite the fact they have a similar form factor. We’ll first list their specifications, and then we’ll move to compare them across a number of other categories you’d expect. Let’s get to it, shall we?
Both of these phones do utilize a similar form factor, with a horizontal layout when unfolded. The thing is, the Find N2 has smaller displays in comparison, and that makes it considerably smaller. It is noticeably shorter than the Pixel Fold, and also quite a bit more narrow. The Find N2 is thicker than Google’s offering, though, and much lighter. It weighs 233 or 237 grams (depending on the model), while the Pixel Fold weighs 283 grams. The difference is huge, actually.
They’re both made out of metal and glass, while the Find N2 also comes with a variant with eco leather back. Unlike the Pixel Fold, the OPPO Find N2 does offer stylus support. On the flip side, the Pixel Fold has an official IPX8 rating for water resistance, while the Find N2 does not. The two devices also look quite different, especially from the back, and when they’re unfolded. The cover displays are quite similar, but different in size.
Both phones have a centered display camera hole on their cover displays. The OPPO Find N2 also has one on the main display (but it’s not centered), while the Pixel Fold hides that camera in its bezel on the main display. Speaking of which, the bezels around the Find N2’s main display are noticeably thinner, which is another reason why the Find N2 is so compact. Both have a side-facing fingerprint scanner, and entirely different-looking camera islands on the back. You’ll find three rear cameras on both phones, though.
Google Pixel Fold vs OPPO Find N2: Display
The Pixel Fold has a 7.6-inch main display. That is a Foldable OLED panel with a 1840 x 2208 resolution, and a 120Hz refresh rate. That display supports HDR10+ content, and gets up to 1,450 nits of brightness at its peak. The cover display on the phone measures 5.8 inches, and it has a 2092 x 1080 resolution. It is an OLED panel with a 120Hz refresh rate, and supports HDR content. It’s protected by Gorilla Glass Victus, and has a 17.4:9 aspect ratio. It gets up to 1,550 nits of peak brightness.
OPPO Find N2
The OPPO Find N2, on the other hand, has a 7.1-inch main display. That is a Foldable LTPO AMOLED display with a resolution of 1792 x 1920. That display has a 120Hz refresh rate, and supports HDR10+ content. It gets up to 1,550 nits at its peak. The second panel measures 5.54 inches, and it offers a resolution of 2120 x 1080. That means it has an 18:9 aspect ratio. That is an AMOLED panel with a 120Hz refresh rate, and it’s protected by the Gorilla Glass Victus. That display gets up to 1,350 nits of brightness.
Truth be said, all displays on these two phones are really good. They’re all bright enough, sharp enough, and also quite smooth as a 120Hz refresh rate has been well-implemented. The viewing angles are not bad either, quite the contrary. The colors are vivid, and the blacks are deep, as you’d expect. They’re different in size, but you’ll be happy using all of them, basically. Even the cover displays are wide enough.
Google Pixel Fold vs OPPO Find N2: Performance
The Google Tensor G2 SoC fuels the Pixel Fold. Google also included 12GB of LPDDR5 RAM on the inside, along with UFS 3.1 flash storage. The OPPO Find N2, on the flip side, is fueled by the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 processor. It also includes up to 16GB of LPDDR5 RAM, and UFS 3.1 flash storage. They’re on an equal playing field in the RAM and storage departments, while the Find N2’s SoC has more raw power than the Tensor G2.
When it comes to actual performance, they’re not that much different. The Find N2 does feel a bit snappier, especially when opening up apps, and multitasking, but the difference is not that big at all. Both phones do a great job and offer consistent performance. The Find N2 does have more gaming prowess, though, so if you plan on playing graphically-intensive games, do take note of that. The Pixel Fold does handle games well, too, though. All in all, chances are you’ll be happy with the performance of both phones.
Google Pixel Fold vs OPPO Find N2: Battery
A 4,821mAh battery sits inside the Pixel Fold, while the Find N2 is equipped with a 4,520mAh battery. Do note that the Find N2 is a considerably smaller device, hence the smaller battery. How do they compare in the battery department, though? Well, your mileage may differ, of course, but for us, both did a great job. We were able to reach 7.5-8 hours of screen-on-time on both phones, on days we did not play games.
Gaming will, of course, negatively impact battery life, so do take note of that. Both phones were able to cross the 8-hour screen-on-time mark at times, and go above it. The thing is, the battery life will also heavily depend on your usage, and depend on which screen you’re using most. If you’re spending a lot of time on the cover display, you’ll get noticeably better battery life. All in all, you could get a completely different experience, but the battery life is not bad overall, not at all.
The Pixel Fold supports 21W wired, and 7.5W wireless charging. The OPPO Find N2, on the other hand, supports 67W wired, and 10W reverse wired charging. OPPO’s handset does charge a lot faster than the Pixel Fold, and it’s not even close. On top of that, the Pixel Fold does not include a charger in the box. OPPO, on the other hand, does, you’ll find a 67W charger inside the Find N2 retail box.
Google Pixel Fold vs OPPO Find N2: Cameras
Each of these phones has three cameras on the back, though they’re fairly different. The Pixel Fold has a 48-megapixel main camera (f/1.7 aperture, OIS, Dual Pixel PDAF), a 10.8-megapixel ultrawide camera (121-degree FoV), and a 10.8-megapixel telephoto camera (5x optical zoom). The OPPO Find N2 includes a 50-megapixel main camera (f/1.8 aperture, OIS, multi-directional PDAF), a 48-megapixel ultrawide unit (115-degree FoV), and a 32-megapixel telephoto camera (2x optical zoom).
Google Pixel Fold
What about the end result? Well, both phones do a good job, actually. The Google Pixel Fold offers that contrasty look you’re used to with other Pixel phones. It has great HDR performance, and does a good job in low light. The OPPO Find N2 has been heavily optimized since launch, and the camera performance improved quite a bit. The images do end up looking detailed and punchy, but not too saturated or anything like that. Low light performance is also quite good, but not to the level of the Pixel Fold.
Both ultrawide cameras offer good performance, albeit not as good as the main sensors. The Pixel Fold’s does offer a wider FoV, though. When it comes to the telephoto camera, that’s an easy with for the Pixel Fold. It has 5x optical zoom, compared to 2x optical zoom on the Find N2. 3x should be minimum, as 2x is not that useful. Let’s hope that OPPO will include 5x or at least 3x with the next model.
Audio
Both of these phones have a set of stereo speakers included. Both of those sets are quite good, though we prefer the sound coming from the Find N2. It does seem to be a bit richer. The difference is not big at all, though.
What you will not find on either phone is an audio jack. You’ll need to rely on Type-C ports for wired audio connections. If you’d prefer to go wireless, do note that the Pixel Fold supports Bluetooth 5.2, while the Find N2 offers Bluetooth 5.3.
The new Netflix rate feature is bringing some changes to what streamers have been used to. Despite calling this feature ‘new’, it’s important to note that rating content on Netflix has been available for a while. The ratings users give content (either shows or movies) helps Netflix understand what a streamer likes.
With this rating feature, users can either like or dislike what they stream. Previously, they could only do this either before or after watching the content via the title page. This allowed them to watch the content first and give a verdict afterwards on whether they liked or disliked what they watched.
Well, things are now changing and Netflix is letting streamers rate content while viewing it. There are a few benefits to this new feature for streamers on the Netflix platform. Let’s have a look at this improvement and how it’d affect Netflix users around the world.
The new Netflix rate feature brings a new way to engage with the content you love
Home to more than 5400 movies and TV shows, Netflix has become the one-stop for content streamers. Most streamers on Netflix get to watch movies based on recommendations from friends or the platform’s algorithm. This algorithm gets its idea of what streamers might like based on their watch history.
By rating a movie Netflix’s algorithm gets to understand what users like and what they don’t like. Now, with the new Netflix rate feature, streamers have the freedom to rate content at any point before they watch, while watching, and even after watching. Previously, streamers could only rate the content from the title page before or after watching the movie.
To give streamers this ability, Netflix will bring the rate buttons (like and dislike) to the video-playing interface. This will make it easily accessible for those watching a movie or TV show. With this tool in hand, streamers can quickly leave a rating, either positive and continue watching or negative and leave at once.
However, it’s good to note that this improvement is now rolling out to Android and iOS users. It will become available via an app update from the Google Play Store or the App Store. This is just one area where Netflix is making some changes to benefit not only its business but also its customers around the world.
