The redesigned Google Home app is now available to everyone

0
[ad_1]
If you’re among the half a million people who have been accepted in the preview program of the redesigned Google Home app, then you’ve probably been missing a lot from what the search giant added to the app over the last several months.

The good news is that after months of testing, Google announced earlier this week that the redesigned Home app is now available to everyone. Along with the availability announcement, Google also revealed some of the most important features that those who haven’t used the preview version will benefit from after installing the new app.

First off, the layout of the map has already been reorganized, so it now has five tabs to make it easier to control connected devices and create home automations. You’ll also be able to see what’s happening in your home quicker and easier.

The new app includes an Inbox that functions like a notifications tab where you can see important updates such as device issues or subscription reminders. On the other hand, the Activity tab will allow you to find your device and camera history in chronological order. There’s also a Favorites tab where users can pin their most-used devices, actions and automations.

With the new-and-improved Google Home app it’s easier to access and view Nest cameras. All feeds are now available in one spot, the Camera Space. Feeds can also be added to the Favorites tab if you want to see the live streams instantly when you open the app.

Google announced that it’s rolling out support for its early generation Nest cameras in the coming months, so starting in July, Public Preview users will be able to start using the app first with Nest Cam Indoor (1st Gen), followed by Nest Cam Outdoor (1st Gen).

In addition, Google revealed that it’s adding more features to the Home app for Wear OS. Apart from being able to scroll through your rooms on your smartwatch, you’ll also be able to access Favorites whenever you want to make adjustments. According to Google, the Home app for Wear OS will be available for everyone starting May 15.

Last but not least, the Google Home app for tablets received some love too. The app got some improvements to landscape and portrait orientations. Support for navigating camera’s timeline view and event list in landscape mode has been added too.


[ad_2]
Source link

Sponsored Twitter post uses fake BBC News site to boost slippery oil trading app

0
[ad_1]

We take a look at a daisy chain of links and clicks leading from a sponsored Twitter ad to a fake BBC website offering up an AI trading app.

A sponsored post on Twitter promises to offer the benefits of obtaining citizenship, but really just wants to lure you into some form of Forex trading AI scheme. This tangled web also includes faked BBC web pages and suspicious-looking website reviews to round the whole thing off. Shall we take a look?

Sponsored posts are adverts in the form of a Tweet. They’re paid for by the advertiser, and can end up in a variety of locations on your Twitter timeline. As the sponsored post FAQ mentions, you won’t necessarily find them on the profile page of the advertiser. This is something scammers may take advantage of, as rogue ads become a bit of a needle in a haystack to find.

This particular sponsored Tweet has been impacted by Twitter’s community notes feature, where users can add collaborative corrections to mis / disinformation and scams. The tweet is also from a Twitter Blue subscriber, which can grant additional visibility as a subscriber perk.

A sponsored tweet claiming to illustrate the benefits of being British.

The Tweet reads as follows:

“Check out what benefits you can get if you are British”

The Community Notes added to this tweet state:

The link, via many redirects, goes to a fake BBC news page promoting an ‘automated trading platform’ scam.

Clicking the link while using a VPN or the TOR browser, which places you outside the UK, results in an “advertorial” for an article promoting a UK-based immigration advice firm. It is listed on the UK’s Law Society website as a recognised legal practice so that, at least, is on the level.

Clicking the link while appearing to be located in the UK gives an entirely different result, in the form of the previously mentioned fake BBC news article. This kind of scam page has been popular with fraudsters for years. Nothing beats the appearance of credibility like aping a major news organisation!

The focus of the fake site is a get rich quick scheme, via the medium of big oil profits and a supposedly withheld TV show. From the article:

“Dragons’ Den” makes Brits rich with oil! The episode may not be broadcast – the broadcaster is furious!

The popular program Dragons’ Den—the UK equivalent of the US show “Shark Tank”, a talent show-style competition for inventors and business people in the UK—is the initial hook.

A fake BBC website using the show Dragon's Den to promote an oil AI app

From the site text:

(BBC) – The Dragons Den Series 17 is over and viewers can once again look forward to very interesting products and ideas. However, one episode of the show may not be broadcast. This episode is about a system with which Brits people can easily earn £7393.39 from home – and that PER DAY. Yes, you read that right – per day.

BBC has the video footage of this programme and we will explain exactly what this is about and why the station was banned from broadcasting this episode.

BBC met Steven Bartlett, one of the investors on “Dragons’ Den”, and he was quite enthusiastic about this system. “It’s an absolute disgrace that politics is intervening again and wants to keep the system secret. Nevertheless, I hope it goes viral on the internet and as many Brits as possible will use it for financial prosperity,” Steven Bartlett said in an interview with our editorial team.

How are you supposed to make this kind of money? Via something called “Oil Trader AI”, which allows you to generate vast wealth from “coronavirus induced” oil price fluctuations. The site then walks you through the steps of how it all works, and the supposed answer is “You have to deposit $314 into another website and the AI takes care of the rest”.

At the bottom of the page is a form to fill in and secure one of the “few” places available to make use of the AI tool.

A sign up form asking for name, email, and phone number

Once you’ve entered your email and phone number, you’re redirected to a second website. The site shows you as being logged in, and whatever email address you used is now displayed as a username.

Below your own details is a screen purporting to show your balance.

A page claiming to show your trading balance from a trading website, which includes a deposit button.

On the right is the “Deposit Funds” button referenced on the fake BBC page. If you click it, the site displays the following message:

Dear client,

In order to deposit funds to your trading account, your account manager will contact you via the phone in the following minutes, please be available to take the call. If you encounter any issues feel free to contact our support department.

A page on the trading site walking through the steps of making a deposit.

We never received a call, so we don’t know if it involves taking someone through the steps of making a deposit on site or something else.

Reviews for the site are peculiar, however. On the Trustpilot review site, there are 69 reviews and 40 are positive with reviews beginning to appear from April 7 onward. This is unusual for a trading site which was only created in February of this year, and with little visibility in search engine results. This can often be one sign that something may be amiss with a site’s reviews.

Here’s a particularly odd review, considering the site is just a few months old:

A review which claims to have been using the service in question for "several years now".

“I have been with them for several years now and have never experienced any issues. They are a reliable and trustworthy broker”.

This person claims to have used them for years. It’s possible this individual followed them to a new site. However, it seems unlikely that the trading portal wouldn’t mention their last site and Internet presence generally. Plus, we also have the below almost identical review from another user:

A review similar to the first which says "I have been using (the site) for several years now".

I have been using [the site] for several years now, and I have never had any issues with withdrawals or deposits. They are highly reliable and trustworthy, which is critical when it comes to choosing a forex broker.

One other user who gave a five star rating claims “I have been trading with them for a year”.

In fact, there isn’t a single positive rating from anyone with more than one review. Each account has made one review of this one specific site, and then never returned. Meanwhile, there are several one star reviews from people with a varied posting history. As you might expect, they advise you to avoid the site completely.

Seeing all of this, the fake BBC page, and the bogus sponsored Twitter post which started the whole thing does not make me confident about wanting to invest. Maybe I could leave a review?

How to avoid dubious trading offers

Sponsored ads may not be what they seem. Twitter is experiencing several issues currently, due to the new checkmark system and bogus ads running wild. Fake death claims leading to scam sites are a particular problem at the moment. Always read the replies, and the Community Notes if present.

Avoid fake BBC sites. A tried and tested tool of scammers everywhere, this is especially the case where offers and get rich quick schemes are being served up. The real BBC news site can be located here.

Be careful with your data. A get rich quick page asking for personal details should be treated with caution. If you must sign up for something, use a tool to mask your email address or phone number.

Review those reviews. Check the age of the site using a Whois tool, look for links in search engines, and count the reviews. Too many over a short period of time may be suspicious, especially if all of the reviewing accounts are new / have one review each only.


Malwarebytes removes all remnants of ransomware and prevents you from getting reinfected. Want to learn more about how we can help protect your business? Get a free trial below.

TRY NOW


[ad_2]
Source link

Galaxy Tab S7 series is now getting Samsung’s May update

0
[ad_1]

Samsung recently updated the Galaxy Tab S8 series to the May 2023 Android security patch. It’s now the Galaxy Tab S7’s turn. Both Galaxy Tab S7 models are picking up this month’s security update in several European countries. A global rollout should be just around the corner.

The May SMR (Security Maintenance Release) for the European versions of the Galaxy Tab S7 and Galaxy Tab S7+ comes with the firmware build numbers T875XXU3DWD3 and T976BXXU3DWD3, respectively. The build number may vary depending on your device model, connectivity variant, and region, but the content should mostly remain the same.

Samsung’s official changelog states that the two tablets are getting some stability and reliability optimizations that improve the device’s behavior. The company doesn’t seem to be pushing any new features, though. Both Galaxy Tab S7 and Galaxy Tab S7+ recently picked up the One UI 5.1 update with a host of new features and improvements. They will get the Android 14-based One UI 6.0 update later this year, or early next year.

Meanwhile, the latest update for the duo brings several dozen vulnerability fixes. Samsung has already revealed that the May SMR for its Galaxy devices contains more than 70 security patches. As usual, that’s the combined total of Android OS patches from Google and partner vendors as well as Galaxy-specific patches from the Korean firm. At least six vulnerabilities patched this month were labeled critical by the respective vendors that provided the patch.

If you’re using the Galaxy Tab S7 or Galaxy Tab S7+ in Europe, these security fixes should be available to you anytime now if they haven’t already. You should receive a notification once the OTA (over the air) release reaches your tablet. You can also go to Settings > Software update and tap on Download and install to check for updates manually. Galaxy Tab S7 users in other regions can also expect to receive Samsung’s May update soon.

The Galaxy Tab S8 series is receiving the May update widely

Samsung started rolling out the May update to the Galaxy Tab S8 series over a week ago. It initially released the update for the Ultra model in Europe. Over the past few days, it has added the base Galaxy Tab S8 and Galaxy Tab S8+ to the party. The rollout has also reached more markets. The company should push the May SMR to both Galaxy Tab S7 and Galaxy Tab S8 lineups globally in the coming weeks.


[ad_2]
Source link

How DDoS protection can safeguard your gaming infrastructure

0
[ad_1]

Millions of individuals worldwide spend countless hours each year engaged in online gaming, propelling the industry’s growth in recent years.

Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) assaults, in particular, have risen in frequency and sophistication along with the growth of online gaming.

As a result of these attacks, gaming infrastructure may incur downtime, revenue loss, and client distrust.

In this article, we’ll look at how game server DDoS protection may help you preserve a competitive advantage while keeping your gaming infrastructure secure.

The Impact of DDoS Attacks on Gaming Infrastructure

The infrastructure supporting online gaming is particularly vulnerable to Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks.

We’ll examine distributed denial of service attacks’ effects on the platforms and systems used by online game companies in this part.

Disruption of Online Gameplay

Online gaming is frequently challenging due to distributed denial of service (DDoS) assaults. Players may experience issues, including latency, delays, and expulsion from games as a result of these hacks.

So, gaming businesses risk losing clients as well as money if hackers are successful in preventing people from playing games online.

Downtime of Servers and Websites

DDoS attacks can also cause significant downtime of servers and websites for online gaming companies.

This downtime can lead to the loss of revenue, damage to the company’s reputation, and loss of customer trust. It can also result in the loss of sensitive user data, which can be costly and damaging to the company.

Loss of Revenue

Loss of revenue is another significant impact of DDoS attacks on gaming companies. If gamers cannot access the game due to a DDoS attack, they may turn to other games, resulting in a company revenue loss.

In some cases, DDoS attacks can also result in ransom demands, which can be costly and damaging to the company.

Benefits of DDoS Protection for Gaming Infrastructure

DDoS protection is essential for online gaming companies to protect their infrastructure from DDoS attacks.

Ensuring uninterrupted online gameplay

For online gaming companies, uninterrupted gameplay is crucial to providing a positive gaming experience to customers. DDoS protection services such as Gcore’s Game Server Protection DDoS is one of the best out there. They can help protect against attacks, ensuring that gamers can continue playing without interruption.

This can result in a positive gaming experience and increased customer satisfaction, leading to increased revenue for the company.

Maintaining server uptime and website availability

DDoS attacks can cause servers and websites to become unavailable, resulting in downtime for the company.

DDoS protection can help ensure that servers and websites remain available, even during DDoS attacks, preventing downtime and potential revenue loss.

Protecting sensitive user data

Online gaming companies hold a vast amount of sensitive user data. DDoS attacks can be used as a cover for data theft, and in some cases, the attacks can result in the loss of sensitive user data.

DDoS protection can help prevent DDoS attacks and protect against data theft, ensuring that user data remains secure.

Increased customer trust

When gamers know that a company has measures to protect against DDoS attacks, they are likelier to trust the company with their sensitive data and continue to play the game.

Increased customer trust can result in increased revenue and a better reputation for the company. DDoS protection can help increase customer trust by demonstrating a commitment to providing a secure gaming experience.

Types of DDoS Protection for Gaming Infrastructure

Several types of DDoS protection are available for gaming infrastructure, including on-premises, cloud-based, and hybrid solutions.

  • On-premises DDoS protection involves installing hardware or software on-site to protect against DDoS attacks. This solution is typically used by larger gaming companies with the resources and expertise to manage their DDoS protection.
  • Cloud-based DDoS protection involves outsourcing DDoS protection to a third-party provider. This solution is typically used by smaller gaming companies that do not have the resources or expertise to manage their DDoS protection.
  • Hybrid DDoS protection combines both on-premises and cloud-based solutions, providing a more comprehensive DDoS protection solution. This solution is typically used by larger gaming companies that want to ensure the highest protection against DDoS attacks.

How to Choose the Right DDoS Protection for Your Gaming Infrastructure

When choosing the proper DDoS protection for your gaming infrastructure, it is essential to understand your needs, evaluate the effectiveness of the DDoS protection solution, and consider the cost of the solution.

Understanding the needs of your gaming infrastructure involves assessing your infrastructure’s size, complexity, and level of risk posed by DDoS attacks.

This information can help you determine the level of protection you need and which solution is best suited for your gaming company.

Evaluating the effectiveness of the DDoS protection solution involves assessing the solution’s ability to protect against DDoS attacks and maintain uptime and availability.

This information can help you choose a DDoS protection solution that meets your company’s needs.

Considering the cost of the DDoS protection solution is also essential when choosing the right solution for your gaming infrastructure.

It is essential to evaluate the cost of the solution against its benefits to ensure that it is cost-effective for your company.

Conclusion

DDoS attacks can cause significant disruption to gaming infrastructure, resulting in downtime, loss of revenue, and damage to customer trust. DDoS protection can help safeguard gaming infrastructure and keep gaming companies ahead of the game.

With the right DDoS protection solution, gaming companies can ensure uninterrupted online gameplay, maintain server uptime and website availability, protect sensitive user data, and increase customer trust.

By understanding your company’s needs, evaluating the effectiveness of the DDoS protection solution, and considering the cost of the resolution, you can choose the proper DDoS protection solution for your gaming infrastructure and ensure the highest level of protection against DDoS attacks.


[ad_2]
Source link

Here’s why you might see different prices inside Android apps in the coming weeks

0
[ad_1]
Figuring out how much to charge for a product is a daunting task. Generally speaking, every seller tries to hit the perfect sweet spot between a price point that would be competitive in the market they are targeting, but also one that would bring them the most profit.

This conundrum is just as present with in-app purchases, which is probably why Google announced it will be launching a new A/B testing tool for Play Console to help developers find the right price for their in-app products. (via AndroidPolice)

But what is A/B testing? Well, it is quite simple once you understand it. A/B testing allows developers to display different experiences and information to users in order to gather analytic data. Then, after analyzing said data, a decision is made on which approach is more successful at delivering the desired results.

In the case of in-app purchases, this new tool from Google will allow developers to display different prices and get a detailed view of how users respond to the experiment. So, technically, if a $6 price tag is presented on your phone, the person next to you might be asked to pay $12 for the same product/service.

Furthermore, the developers can get crucial analytic information regarding buyer ratio, orders, new installers, revenue uplift, and average revenue per paying user. These A/B tests can also be rolled out to specific markets, making them targetable to particular areas and groups of people.

Google says price experiments for in-app products will be available in the coming weeks and that developers will be able to manage them directly within Play Console, which will have a new dedicated section under Monetize > Products > Price experiments.

So, what does all of this mean to us average Joes that don’t make apps for a living, though? Well, it just means that we might see some price changes from time to time in the apps we use. This could result in lower or higher price tags, but whatever the case, it might be worth it to note down or take a screenshot of the numbers you are seeing right now (just for reference and for the sake of tracking).


[ad_2]
Source link

YouTube is testing ad blocker detection

0
[ad_1]

We take a look at YouTube’s testing of ad blocking detection and why it might not be popular with users.

YouTube is dipping a toe into the muddy waters of ad-blocker blocking, with ad-blocker using Redditors complaining about a popup that warns “Ad blockers are not allowed on YouTube,” when they visit the site.

An adblock warning popup on YouTube
(Image source: Reddit user Sazk100)

The popup message explains that “Ads allow YouTube to stay free for billions of users worldwide,” and invites users who want to be ad-free to take out a YouTube Premium subscription.

Despite the “Ad blockers are not allowed on YouTube” claim, only a select group of individuals currently see this messaging. A YouTube spokesperson confirmed this is currently just a test, though there’s no information with regard to how many people are seeing it or which regions its being seen in:

“We’re running a small experiment globally that urges viewers with ad blockers enabled to allow ads on YouTube or try YouTube premium”.

They also note that ad detection isn’t a new thing, and publishers often ask site visitors to disable ad-blocking tools. Everyone reading this very blog has almost certainly experienced a “Please turn off your ad blocker to view this site” notification on a website at some time.

The big problem is that these messages tend to be unpopular, and can turn visitors away from a site. If the content you want to see or read is available elsewhere, why go to the hassle of altering your settings?

In recent years, many sites have adopted a more cautious popup method in an effort to not aggravate visitors. A typical example might say “Support our content, funded by adverts which are used to pay the writers”. Underneath you’ll be given the option to turn off the blocker, or visit the site without doing so this time around. Whether repeat visitors actually do turn off the blocker on the next visit is something only the site owners could know.

In terms of how this is going down with YouTube users, it’s not great. Here’s a typical reaction from the Reddit post where this test was first revealed:

Seriously, watching a recorded stream as we speak and I’ve been timing it. I got an ad, then four minutes later, another pair of ads, six minutes after that, another pair of unskippable ads. Ridiculous.

Ouch. 

A big issue for YouTube users is frequency of adverts, but also length. Users are tired of rapid fire short ads which require a constant supply of clicking to skip. They’re also not fans of the long format adverts, which can hit 30 minutes, an hour, or in one extreme case 4 whole hours!

If you stray into the wacky world of content for children, other types of ad are a problem too. The 20 minute+ adverts which are essentially glorified toy adverts dressed up as cartoons can be a pain to have to keep skipping on a television.

As you’d expect, people have already figured out how to bypass or skip the YouTube ad-block testing in the form of tools such as uBlock origin.

While “These videos can only exist with the support of ads” may be a good point, there are very good reasons why so many people now block ads by default in the first place. Those reasons would include scam ads, and malvertising—the delivery of malware via ad content.

Ad networks have been given chances time and time again to clean up the rogues, fix the malware drive-by antics, and shut down the malvertisers. Despite this, the problem refuses to go away and so some of us would like to stay protected until it is.

The sites using those ad networks are ultimately collateral damage. If YouTube takes a hard line on this, it runs the risk of the biggest YouTubers moving elsewhere. Direct funding, Patreons and other methods of revenue generation are out there and they don’t run the risk of alienating fans with advert-related demands.

Blocking ads is a personal choice, and it’s hard to argue in favour of trusting ad networks when bad ads land in front of millions of people on a regular basis. As I said earlier: this isn’t an “us” problem, it’s a “them” problem. People don’t block ads for the sake of it; they do it because they find them to be annoying, intrusive, or potentially dangerous. This is the consequence of years of bad ad practices, and it’s up to the networks behind them to put in some heavy lifting.


Malwarebytes protects against annoying ads and scams while blocking trackers that spy on you.

TRY NOW


[ad_2]
Source link

Google Pixel 7a vs Google Pixel 6a

0
[ad_1]

The Google Pixel 7a is the company’s brand new mid-range smartphone. This handset got announced during Google I/O 2023, and it does bring a number of improvements over its predecessor. Having said that, in this article, we’ll compare the Google Pixel 7a vs Google Pixel 6a. Some of you are probably wondering whether to upgrade, or to get the Pixel 6a considering its lower price tag.

Well, we’ll try to help you get answers to some of your questions here. We’ll first list their specifications side by side, and will then move to compare them across a number of other categories. You’ll get a comparison between their designs, displays, performance, battery life, cameras, and audio performance. Having said that, let’s get this show on the road.

Specs

Google Pixel 7a Google Pixel 6a
Screen size 6.1-inch fullHD+ flat OLED display (90Hz refresh rate) 6.1-inch fullHD+ OLED HDR display (60Hz)
Screen resolution 2400 x 1080 2400 x 1080
SoC Google Tensor G2 Google Tensor
RAM 8GB (LPDDR5) 6GB (LPDDR5)
Storage 128GB (UFS 3.1), non-expandable 128GB (UFS 3.1), non-expandable
Rear cameras 64MP (f/1.9 aperture, 26mm lens, 0.8um pixel size, OIS, Dual Pixel PDAF)
13MP (f/2.2 aperture, 120-degree FoV, 1.12um pixel size)
12.2MP (f/1.7 aperture, 27mm lens, 1.4um pixel size, dual pixel PDAF, OIS)
12MP (f/2.2 aperture, 17mm lens, 114-degree FoV, 1.25um pixel size)
Front cameras 13MP (f/2.2 aperture, 20mm lens, 1.12um pixel size) 8MP (f/2.0 aperture, 24mm lens, 1.12um pixel size)
Battery 4,385mAh, non-removable, 20W wired charging, 18W wireless charging
Charger not included
4,410mAh, non-removable, 18W wired charging
Charger not included
Dimensions 152 x 72.9 x 9mm 152.2 x 71.8 x 8.9mm
Weight 193.5 grams 178 grams
Connectivity 5G, LTE, NFC, Bluetooth 5.3, Wi-Fi, USB Type-C 5G, LTE, NFC, Bluetooth 5.2, Wi-Fi, USB Type-C
Security In-display fingerprint scanner (optical)
Face Unlock
In-display fingerprint scanner (optical)
OS Android 13 Android 12 (upgradable to Android 13)
Price $499 $329 (discounted from $449)
Buy Amazon Amazon

Google Pixel 7a vs Google Pixel 6a: Design

It is easy to notice that these two phones are related, but there are obvious differences visible as well. They both have a centered display camera hole at the top, and a square-ish design. They also both have a camera visor on the back, but different ones. The one on the Pixel 7a is covered by metal, while the one on the Pixel 6a is covered by glass. They both protrude on the back, but are nowhere near the level of the Pixel 7.

Both phones also include flat displays, with thin bezels. The bottom bezel is thicker than the rest of them on both phones. You will also find a plastic backplate on both of these devices, which is combined with a frame made out of aluminum. The physical keys on both phones sit on the right-hand side. The power/lock button is placed above the volume up and down buttons. A fingerprint scanner is also included in both phones, but it’s not visible, as it sits under the display (an optical one).

The two phones are almost equally tall and thick, but the Pixel 6a is a bit more narrow. The Pixel 7a probably has slightly thicker bezels, hence the difference. It is also lighter, noticeably lighter. It weighs 178 grams, compared to 193.5 grams of the Pixel 7a. Now, both phones do offer IP67 certification for water and dust resistance. Both of them sit really nicely in the hand, but are slippery at the same time.

Google Pixel 7a vs Google Pixel 6a: Display

The Pixel 7a features a 6.1-inch fullHD+ (2400 x 1080) flat OLED display. That panel has a 90Hz refresh rate, and it offers a 20:9 aspect ratio. It is protected by the Gorilla Glass 3. The Pixel 6a, on the other hand, also has a 6.1-inch fullHD+ (2400 x 1080) panel, but it’s different. This is also an OLED display, but it has a 60Hz refresh rate. The aspect ratio is the same, though, as is the Gorilla Glass 3 protection.

Pixel 6a Lock Screen

Both of these displays look good in general. They offer vivid colors, good viewing angles, and good touch response. The Pixel 7a does get a bit brighter, though, which will be useful outdoors. Also, if you do notice the difference between low and high refresh rates, this will be quite a difference for you. The jump from 60 to 90Hz is quite obvious, especially when you’re scrolling or doing something similar.

Now, as far as display protection goes. The Gorilla Glass 3 is definitely not the best solution. It is quite dated at this point, and we’ve always had issues with it picking up micro-scratches. It’s a shame Google didn’t use newer display protection here, but all those problems can be avoided if you end up using a screen protector, of course. All in all, these displays are not bad at all.

Google Pixel 7a vs Google Pixel 6a: Performance

The Pixel 7 comes with the Google Tensor G2 SoC. That is Google’s latest processor, by the way. It fuels the company’s flagships too. The phone also includes 8GB of LPDDR5 RAM, and UFS 3.1 flash storage. The Pixel 6a is fueled by the Google Tensor SoC. The phone comes with 6GB of LPDDR5 RAM and UFS 3.1 flash storage.

The Tensor G2 is the more powerful processor here, but the difference is not as big as you may think. The extra RAM inside the Pixel 7a does come in handy, but we didn’t really notice any difference in performance because of it. Neither phone is outstanding in keeping apps actively running in the background, even though they’re good at it. The point is, they’re on the same level.

The same can be said about performance. The Pixel 7a may be a bit faster, but the difference is not really that noticeable. In regular, everyday tasks, you will notice the difference in refresh rate more than you will the difference in sheer power. Neither phone is great for gaming, however, even though they can play the vast majority of games perfectly well. If you plan on playing a lot of demanding games on your phone, however, you may want to look elsewhere. Overall, however, the performance is great (and comparable), not counting in gaming, of course.

Google Pixel 7a vs Google Pixel 6a: Battery

There is a 4,385mAh battery inside the Pixel 7a. The Pixel 6a, on the flip side, includes a 4,410mAh battery. Now, the difference in battery capacity is not that big, but we did notice quite a difference in actual performance. The Pixel 7a lingered around 6 hours of screen-on-time most of the time. We’ve seen much better numbers from some other people, so this may be just a bug, or perhaps a rogue app we can’t pinpoint. It should be able to offer much more than that, to be quite honest.

The Pixel 6a offers really good battery life, it can cross 7-7.5 hours of screen-on-time without a problem, even more at times. It all depends on what you’re doing on your device. As per usual, do note that your mileage may vary. You’ll be using different apps, in a different way, in a different place (signal), so… yeah, you could get entirely different numbers than we did.

When charging is concerned, the Pixel 7a supports 21W charging, while the Pixel 6a offers support for 18W wired charging. The Pixel 7a also supports wireless charging, but it’s so slow, it’s not really worth mentioning. Well, it could be useful if you charge your phone overnight. Neither of the two phones comes with a charging brick, unfortunately. If you don’t have a PD3.0 charger, you’ll need to get one.

Google Pixel 7a vs Google Pixel 6a: Cameras

The Pixel 7a features a 64-megapixel main camera, and a 13-megapixel ultrawide camera (120-degree FoV). The Pixel 6a, on the flip side, has a 12.2-megapixel main unit, and a 12-megapixel ultrawide camera (114-degree FoV). The hardware is obviously not the same, but when it comes to Google’s camera performance, image processing is quite important. So, are these two phones identical when it comes to camera performance? Well, no, not really.

Google Pixel 7a Review AM AH 17

In the daytime, they are very similar. This goes for both the main and ultrawide cameras. They produce similar-looking images, with similar color balance, and general output. The differences are visible when you’re shooting in HDR conditions, as the Pixel 7a tends to light up the darker areas a bit more. The differences are subtle, however, and some of you may even prefer the Pixel 6a’s output.

In low light, however, the differences are more noticeable. Both phones do a great job, but with a different color profiles. That is not always as noticeable, but it’s there. In some situations, it’s extremely noticeable. In some shots, the color profiles look a lot different. The Pixel 6a tends to provide colder images, which is what we’re used to when it comes to Pixel phones. The Pixel 7a leans towards the warmer side of things, which makes low light images a bit more realistic. Both phones do a great job, though.

Audio

You will find a pair of stereo speakers on both of these phones. Those speakers are good enough on both, but they’re nothing to write home about. Considering these price tags, they’re quite good.

What you will not find on either phone is an audio jack. You will have to use a Type-C port at the bottom for wired audio connections. If you prefer wireless audio, however, Bluetooth 5.3 is included on the Pixel 7a, while the Pixel 6a comes with Bluetooth 5.2.


[ad_2]
Source link

OPPO is ditching MariSilicon, cancels mobile SoC plans

0
[ad_1]

OPPO was planning on making its own mobile processors, but that won’t happen after all. The company confirmed that it’s working on its custom SoCs way back in 2020, and earlier this year it was reported that the very first product is coming in 2024.

OPPO won’t be making its own processors after all

Why did OPPO decide to make such a drastic move, after years of working on its processors? Well, the reason OPPO shared with the public is… due to the global economy and market uncertainty.

This may not seem like a big deal, but the competition in the market is always good. The more competitors we have, the better it is for the industry as a whole. They push each other to do better, and thus provide us with better products. More competition also brings the prices down.

So, it’s a shame this won’t happen. OPPO has been doing a great job overall for years. Its own NPU turned out to be immensely capable, and so did the MariSilicon Y Bluetooth chip that the company made.

Just to be clear, OPPO is shutting down its ZEKU chip unit, which made MariSilicon chips. So that not only means that we won’t get a proper mobile SoC, but OPPO won’t be making MariSilicon hardware in general anymore. Any products in the pipeline that are meant to use MariSilicon hardware will still use it, though.

Revining this project in the future is not out of the question

It would surely be interesting to see what OPPO can do with a mobile processor. That won’t happen, though, at least not for now. Nothing is stopping OPPO from reviving this project at some point in the future.

The company will focus on some other aspects of the business following this. The aspects that made it so popular in the first place. The company did not elaborate on that, but the smartphone business has been doing great for OPPO.

The company is flying high in China, and some other markets, and it’s constantly expanding. Its foldable smartphones have become quite popular, even though only one launched outside of China, earlier this year.

The OPPO Find N2 Flip launched globally, while its sibling is highly-regarded outside of China, even though it did not launch anywhere else, at least not for now. We’re sure OPPO has interesting plans for the future, despite the news regarding its mobile processors.


[ad_2]
Source link

Waze brings its app to all cars with Google built-in, expands support for EV stations

0
[ad_1]

If you’re using an electric car, then you might already be aware that Waze launched support for EV charging stations in March. Following the launch of that feature, Waze and Google announced that they’re bringing EV charging stations support to drivers who use Waze in-car with Android Auto, Google built-in or CarPlay.Thanks to this update, drivers will get up-to-date charging station information curated by the Waze Community, so it will make it easier to charge your car and get help finding where or when you’ll come across the next station.

This feature is only available in the United States for now, and Waze confirmed that drivers in the country will see more charging stations on the Waze Map in their local areas in the coming months. Obviously, these will be verified by Waze Community in the United States.

In addition to expanding support for EV charging stations to more drivers, Waze revealed that it’s launching its navigation app for all cars that support Google built-in. Previously only available on Android Auto, Waze is now available on the Google Play Store globally for all cars with Google built-in.

After launching on Renault, Volvo and Polestar vehicles, it’s nice that Waze managed to bring the app to even more drivers who can experience the best of Waze’s real-time navigation without the need for a smartphone.

Of course, the app offers the same benefits as the one that’s been available on Android Auto for quite some time, including real-time reports on traffic and road closures.


[ad_2]
Source link

Samsung is readying Book Cover Keyboard for Galaxy Tab S9

0
[ad_1]

Samsung is readying a bunch of new Android tablets. There are rumors about three Galaxy Tab S9 series flagship models and two mid-range models, one or both of which may arrive as the Galaxy Tab S9 FE. While we wait for more details about the latter two, the former three have just had their official keyboard accessories approved by the South Korean regulatory body RRR (Radio Research Agency).

First spotted by GalaxyClub, the RRR recently certified three new Book Cover Keyboards made by Samsung. The listing mentions model numbers EF-DX715, EF-DX815, and EF-DX915 for the three accessories. Based on previous reports, those keyboard accessories are for the Galaxy Tab S9, Galaxy Tab S9+, and Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra, respectively. That’s because the model numbers for the keyboards correspond to that for the upcoming three flagship tablets.

For the uninitiated, Samsung is developing the Galaxy Tab S9 with the model number SM-X71*. More precisely, SM-X710 for the global Wi-Fi version, SM-X716B for the global 5G version, and SM-X718U for the US 5G version. Likewise, the Galaxy Tab S9+ bears the model number SM-X810/SM-X716B/SM-X718U depending on the region and connectivity version while the Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra has the model number SM-X910/SM-X916B/SM-X918U.

The two mid-range Samsung tablets that appeared on Geekbench last month have the model numbers SM-X51* and SM-X61*. No corresponding keyboard accessories were found for these two models on the RRR’s website. It’s unclear if Samsung doesn’t plan to offer a Book Cover Keyboard for these tablets or if the accessories are still pending approval. It’s also possible that Samsung doesn’t plan to launch them alongside the flagship models. So it isn’t hurrying to obtain regulatory certifications for them. We shall find out soon.

The Galaxy Tab S9 series may debut in July

Samsung may launch the Galaxy Tab S9 series in late July. The company is expected to unveil the new tablets at its next Galaxy Unpacked event. While it usually holds the event in August, reports suggest this year’s event will take place a few weeks earlier. The South Korean firm is also reportedly planning to host the event in its homeland rather than in the US. It made these decisions considering the current global economic situation and other similar factors.

While we wait for the official confirmation on the date and location of Samsung’s next Galaxy Unpacked event, it’s confirmed that the event will be full of hardware announcements. Along with the three flagship tablets, the company will also unveil its latest foldables during this event. We are expecting a couple of new smartwatches as well. Last but not least, Samsung may debut a new pair of TWS earbuds. Stay tuned for more information about these upcoming Galaxy products.

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 series Book Cover Keyboard certification South Korea


[ad_2]
Source link