OnePlus 11 vs Xiaomi 13 Ultra

andreasc
-
0
OnePlus 11 vs Xiaomi 13 Ultra
[ad_1]

The Xiaomi 13 Ultra is the company’s brand new flagship. This phone has an outstanding camera setup on the back, and it’ll be interesting to see how it compares to the very best of OnePlus. In this article, we’ll compare the OnePlus 11 vs Xiaomi 13 Ultra. These two phones are quite different, even though they do share some specs. They do feel different in the hand, though, look different, and for the most part, have different spec sheets.

One thing to note is that, at the time of writing this article, the Xiaomi 13 Ultra did not launch globally yet. We’ve used and reviewed the Chinese variant of the phone. The global model is coming, but we don’t know when exactly at this time. Only the software will be different, tuned for the global markets. Having said that, we’ll first list the specs of these two phones, and will then compare them across a number of other areas.

Specs

OnePlus 11Xiaomi 13 Ultra
Screen size6.7-inch QHD+ LTPO3 Fluid AMOLED display (120Hz refresh rate, curved, 1,300 nits peak brightness, LTPO down to 1Hz)6.73-inch QHD+ LTPO AMOLED display (curved, 120Hz adaptive refresh rate, 2,600 nits peak brightness)
Screen resolution3216 x 14403120 x 1440
SoCQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
RAM8GB/16GB (LPDDR5X)12GB (LPDDR5X)
Storage128GB/256GB, non-expandable (UFS 4.0)256GB/512GB, non-expandable (UFS 4.0)
Rear cameras50MP (f/1.8 aperture, 1.0um pixel size, OIS, multi-directional PDAF)
48MP (ultrawide, f/2.2 aperture, 115-degree FoV, AF)
32MP (telephoto, f/2.0 aperture, 2x optical zoom, PDAF)		50.3MP (Sony’s IMX989 1-inch sensor, f/1.9-f/4.0 aperture, 23mm lens, 1.6um pixel size, multi-directional PDAF, Laser AF, OIS)
50MP (ultrawide, 122-degree FoV, f/1.8 aperture, 12mm lens, dual-pixel PDAF)
50 MP (telephoto, f/1.8 aperture, 75mm lens, 3.2x optical zoom, dual-pixel PDAF)
50MP (periscope telephoto, 5x optical zoom, dual-pixel PDAF, OIS, 120mm lens)
Front cameras16MP (f/2.5 aperture, 25mm lens, 1.0um pixel size)32MP (wide angle)
Battery5,000mAh, non-removable, 100W wired (80W in the US) charging
Charger included		5,000mAh, non-removable, 90W wired charging, 50W wireless charging, 10W reverse wireless charging
Charger included
Dimensions163.1 x 74.1 x 8.5mm163.2 x 74.6 x 9.1mm
Weight205 grams227 grams
Connectivity5G, LTE, NFC, Bluetooth 5.3, Wi-Fi, USB Type-C5G, LTE, NFC, Bluetooth 5.3, Wi-Fi, USB Type-C
SecurityFace scanning (front camera)
In-display fingerprint scanner (optical)		In-display fingerprint scanner (optical)
OSAndroid 13
OxygenOS 13		Android 13
MIUI 14
Price$699/$799CNY5,999 ($872)+
BuyOnePlusChina only for now

OnePlus 11 vs Xiaomi 13 Ultra: Design

Both of these phones come with rounded corners, and curved displays. They also have display camera holes, but in different spots. The OnePlus 11 has a display camera hole in the top-left corner, while the one on the Xiaomi 13 Ultra is centered up top. Thin bezels are present around both displays. The OnePlus 11 includes a power/lock key, and an alert slider on the right side. The volume up and down buttons are on the left. All the physical buttons on the Xiaomi 13 Ultra are placed on the right side.

Now, when we flip the two phones over, you’ll notice plenty of differences. The OnePlus 11 has a circular camera island in the top-left corner of its backplate. That camera island connects to the side frame, in a way. This handset also has glass on the back. The Xiaomi 13 Ultra has a larger circular camera island, but it’s centered in the upper portion of the phone’s back. That portion of the phone’s back is also thicker than the lower portion, as the thickness gradually increases towards the camera island. Xiaomi did this on purpose to hide the camera bump a bit, and also provide an anchor point for the finger. The Xiaomi 13 Ultra also has vegan leather on the back, not glass. That vegan leather layer does not extend fully towards the sides of the phone, almost, but not quite. It’s an interesting design, and this is the first time we’re seeing something like this.

The two devices feel entirely different in the hand. The Xiaomi 13 Ultra is more grippy, while the OnePlus 11 is noticeably lighter, even though neither is particularly light. The Xiaomi 13 Ultra weighs 227 grams, while the OnePlus 11 weighs 205 grams. The two phones are almost equally tall and wide, while the Xiaomi 13 Ultra is a bit thicker. They both feel truly premium in the hand, as they’re really well built. Both phones also offer water and dust resistance, though the Xiaomi 13 Ultra offers better protection (IP68 vs IP64 certification).

OnePlus 11 vs Xiaomi 13 Ultra: Display

The OnePlus 11 features a 6.7-inch QHD+ (3216 x 1440) LTPO3 Fluid AMOLED display. This panel is curved, and it projects up to 1 billion colors. It offers a 120Hz refresh rate, which is adaptive, by the way. Dolby Vision is also supported, as is HDR10+ content. This display gets up to 1,300 nits of peak brightness. We’re looking at a 20:9 display aspect ratio here, while the panel is protected by the Gorilla Glass Victus.

OnePlus 11 Review AM AH 05
OnePlus 11 display

The Xiaomi 13 Ultra, on the flip side, has a 6.73-inch LTPO AMOLED display. This panel is also curved, and it can project up to 1 billion colors. It has an adaptive refresh rate of up to 120Hz, and supports both Dolby Vision and HDR10+. This display gets up to 2,600 nits of peak brightness, and is, at the moment, technically the brightness display on the market. Its display aspect ratio is 20:9, while the Gorilla Glass Victus protects this panel.

Alright, so… both of these panels are outstanding. They offer vivid colors, deep blacks, and are more than sharp enough. The viewing angles are also great, so that’s not something you have to worry about. The same goes for touch response. Where you will see the difference is in the brightness segment. The Xiaomi 13 Ultra’s panel does get considerably brighter, which is important if you’re spending a lot of time outdoors, especially in direct sunlight.

OnePlus 11 vs Xiaomi 13 Ultra: Performance

Both of these smartphones are fueled by the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SoC. That is the most powerful processor Qualcomm has to offer at the moment. They’re both also equipped with LPDDR5X RAM and UFS 4.0 flash storage. Well, the 8GB RAM variant of the OnePlus 11 actually offers UFS 3.1 storage, so that’s an exception. In any case, both smartphones come in models with up to 16GB of RAM.

Is the performance any good, though? Well, yes, it’s outstanding on both phones. I’m talking simply from the smoothness aspect. You won’t notice any lag on either of these two phones. They’re really fast when it comes to your regular, everyday tasks. The same can be said for gaming too. They can open apps really fast, are great for browsing, media consumption, and so on.

If you to put some weight on their backs via graphically-demanding games, they won’t break. Quite the contrary, both of these phones strive in that regard. They can run the most demanding games on Android without a problem. That even goes for Genshin Impact, which is usually my go-to game for testing the graphics. The software implementations are entirely different, especially considering that the Xiaomi 13 Ultra we tested is a model made for the Chinese market. That’s an entirely different story.

OnePlus 11 vs Xiaomi 13 Ultra: Battery

There is a 5,000mAh battery inside both of these phones. Their battery life is not the same, however. Both offer great battery life, but the OnePlus 11 is in a league of its own. Well, the Galaxy S23 Ultra and OnePlus 11 are, kind of. In any case, we were able to get around 8 hours of screen-on-time from the Xiaomi 13 Ultra. Well, a bit more on that, on average. The OnePlus 11 did not have problems going over 10 hours of screen-on-time for us, actually.

One thing to note is that we’re talking about battery life without the gaming aspect. When we included gaming into the equation, the results were different. Both of these phones do have great battery life, but do note that you may get different results. You’ll use different apps, have different usage habits, and also different signal strengths. So… do note that into account. Our numbers do not have to reflect what you’ll get out of these two phones.

The OnePlus 11 supports 100W wired (80W in the US) charging, while it does not offer wireless charging support. The Xiaomi 13 Ultra supports 90W wired, 50W wireless, and 10W reverse wireless charging. Both smartphones do come with chargers in the box, though, which is something we cannot say for Apple, Samsung, and Google phones. They will recharge really fast, needless to say.

OnePlus 11 vs Xiaomi 13 Ultra: Cameras

The OnePlus 11 includes a 50-megapixel main camera, a 48-megapixel ultrawide unit (115-degree FoV), and a 32-megapixel telephoto camera (2x optical zoom). The Xiaomi 13 Ultra has a 50-megapixel main camera (1-inch camera sensor, variable aperture), a 50-megapixel ultrawide camera (122-degree FoV), a 50-megapixel telephoto camera (3.2x optical zoom), and a 50-megapixel periscope telephoto unit (5x optical zoom). OnePlus partnered up with Hasselblad, while the Xiaomi 13 Ultra includes Leica lenses and some software.

AH Xiaomi 13 Ultra image 99
Xiaomi 13 Ultra rear cameras

That being said, these two phones do provide considerably different pictures. Let’s tackle the main cameras first. The Xiaomi 13 Ultra technically has a better camera sensor. It can provide you with that natural bokeh, and thanks to the variable aperture, it’s less of a problem in some shots. The photos from the Xiaomi 13 Ultra do look closer to what you’d get out of a professional camera, while the OnePlus 11 relies on processing a bit more. The Xiaomi 13 Ultra will provide you with more fine detail in low light, but to some, the OnePlus 11 shots may look better overall. The results are different, but both phones do an outstanding job.

When it comes to all the other rear-facing cameras, we prefer the Xiaomi 13 Ultra. Its ultrawide camera does not only offer a wider field of view, but it also does a better job of keeping up with the main camera. The telephoto camera has a better optical zoom implementation, and overall does a better job, not to mention that it’s outstanding for portraits. The OnePlus 11 doesn’t even have a periscope telephoto camera, so that’s a moot point. The video recording is good on both, but the Xiaomi 13 Ultra does it better in low light conditions.

The selfie camera results are definitely better on the OnePlus 11. Xiaomi didn’t really do a good job in that regard. The Xiaomi 13 Ultra’s selfie camera, at least at the moment, tends to overexpose, and the images do tend to look a bit washed out. That could be fixed via updates, though, of course.

Audio

Both of these smartphones do offer a set of stereo speakers. The Xiaomi 13 Ultra’s second speaker is located at the top, not under the earpiece. That may be a benefit for some, but if you like sound shooting directly at you, you may not like this. In any case, both sets of speakers are quite good. The sound is loud and detailed, no complaints here

There is no audio jack on either phone. They both do include Type-C ports, so you can always hook up your headphones that way, you will need a dongle, though. Both smartphones are equipped with Bluetooth 5.3, for wireless audio connections.


[ad_2]
Source link

Status sharing to Facebook is now available in WhatsApp Beta

andreasc
-
0
Status sharing to Facebook is now available in WhatsApp Beta
[ad_1]

The latest WhatsApp beta upgrade brings status sharing to Facebook users. This is a blend between the two social media platforms, and some users will find this feature very interesting. Although it is still in its beta testing phase, this feature is still catching the attention of netizens.

Beta testers came across this feature with an update to the WhatsApp Beta app a few weeks ago. By the time it was spotted it was in the development stage and these testers couldn’t put it to use. But this feature is now available for testing thanks to the latest update to the WhatsApp Beta application.

Since WhatsApp and Facebook share the same parent company, they can be used seamlessly. Business owners will find the ability to share status updates made on WhatsApp to Facebook with just one tap of a button. WhatsApp hopes that users will find this feature useful, and in this article, you will learn more about it.

Here are the details concerning the status sharing to Facebook feature

If you use both Facebook and WhatsApp regularly, you’d notice the slight similarity between their story and status features. They both have the same concept, allowing users to share posts that only stay up for 24 hours. Within this period, a user is free to delete the post if they no longer find it as appealing as it did at first.

Now, the idea of this new feature that is available for WhatsApp Beta testers is that it allows users to share status posts to stories. So, if a user makes a post on their WhatsApp status, this feature will automatically share it with their stories. This might excite some users while throwing some off balance, and there is a good reason for this.

Most people fall back to WhatsApp to communicate with their family and close friends. Facebook, on the other hand, is open to a wider number of people, some of whom are not close relatives or friends.

For this reason, sharing your WhatsApp status to Facebook might sound like a bad idea. But, Meta thought this through, and they added an optional button for users. This button works like the status privacy button and when toggled on will permit the sharing of a user’s WhatsApp status to their Facebook stories. If toggled off, then there will be no sharing of anything between WhatsApp and Facebook.

Once available to the global audience, this feature will find its place on the status privacy page. Just under ‘my contacts,’ ‘my contacts except,’ and ‘only share with’ options you’d find the Facebook option. Tap on this to link your Facebook account to your WhatsApp account if you want to share your status between both platforms.

After the linking process is complete, all statuses a user posts on WhatsApp will be accessible via their Facebook stories. Business owners that use WhatsApp will find this feature quite helpful, as it eases off the stress of posting on both platforms separately. You will get this feature for usage via an app update, which will roll out gradually to various users globally.


[ad_2]
Source link

Critical Vulnerabilities In Illumina Universal Copy Service Devices

andreasc
-
0
Critical Vulnerabilities In Illumina Universal Copy Service Devices
[ad_1]

US CISA warns of critical vulnerabilities affecting the security of Illumina devices. The vulnerabilities exist in the Illumina Universal Copy Service software, allowing remote code execution attacks.

Illumina Universal Copy Service Vulnerabilities

According to a recent CISA alert, at least two vulnerabilities were discovered in Illumina DNA sequencing devices.

Illumina is a US-based biotechnology firm that develops and markets equipment for genetic analysis and related biological and medical functions. The firm develops key devices for gene sequencing, gene expression, genotyping, and proteomics. The Universal Copy Service is a key software for DNA sequencing in health and research facilities.

As specified in CISA’s advisory, the first vulnerability is a critical severity (CVSS 10.0) remote code execution flaw (CVE-2023-1968) in the Universal Copy Service v2.x. The flaw existed due to binding to an unrestricted IP address. Exploiting the flaw could allow an attacker to listen on all IP addresses.

The second issue (CVE-2023-1966) is a high-severity privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 7.4) in the Universal Copy Service v1.x and v2.x. Exploiting the flaw could allow unnecessary privileges to an unauthenticated remote attacker to change device settings and meddle with sensitive information.

These UCS vulnerabilities subsequently affect a range of medical devices running the software. The vulnerable equipment include:

  • iScan Control Software: v4.0.0 and v4.0.5
  • iSeq 100: All versions
  • MiniSeq Control Software: v2.0 and newer
  • MiSeqDx Operating Software: v4.0.1 and newer
  • MiSeq Control Software: v4.0 (RUO Mode)
  • NextSeq 500/550 Control Software: v4.0
  • NextSeq 550Dx Operating Software:  v1.0.0 to 1.3.1 and v1.3.3 and newer
  • NextSeq 550Dx Control Software: 0 (RUO Mode)
  • NextSeq 1000/2000 Control Software: v1.4.1 and prior
  • NovaSeq Control Software: v1.8
  • NovaSeq 6000 Control Software: v1.7 and prior

Patches Rolled Out

Regarding the vulnerabilities, Illumina has shared a detailed security bulletin highlighting the flaws and the respective patches. According to FDA, the vendor has also notified all affected customers to check and update their vulnerable systems.

Besides, CISA has also shared some mitigations for the issues, which include limiting network exposure for control systems and devices, protecting such systems behind firewalls, and ensuring secure remote access via tools like VPNs.

Let us know your thoughts in the comments.


[ad_2]
Source link

Twitter to enable per-article charging for publishers in May

andreasc
-
0
Twitter to enable per-article charging for publishers in May
[ad_1]

Elon Musk announced a per-article charging feature for publishers, allowing them to make money from their shared articles on Twitter. The feature will be available this month.

The most convenient way for publishers to make money is to sell subscriptions to readers. This method has been around for quite a long time. But Twitter is thinking of an out-of-the-box monetization method for publishers. According to Musk’s latest tweet, the platform “will allow media publishers to charge users on a per article basis with one click.”

This method can benefit both users and publishers. Users no longer need to buy a subscription and should only pay for the occasional article they want to read. As for the publishers, they can sell articles to individual users at a higher price. The per-article charging feature could also benefit independent journalists that have interesting stories to tell.

“This enables users who would not sign up for a monthly subscription to pay a higher per-article price for when they want to read an occasional article,” Musk added.

Twitter’s per-article charging feature goes live this month

Neither Twitter nor Elon Musk has yet explained how the feature would work. It also remains to be seen what accounts could access the feature and how much Twitter takes as its commission. Twitter is now taking a 10% cut on Subscriptions, and it might apply the same rule to per-article charging fees. The feature will be rolled out in the coming weeks, and we can learn more about it.

One possibility is that Twitter might limit the feature to the publishers that pay $8 a month for a Blue subscription. Adding premium features to the Blue tier will entice more users to pay for it, and Twitter could finally make more money.

Elon Musk is employing every possible tool to keep Twitter profitable. The platform has recently dropped verification badges from legacy accounts to force them to pay $8 for Twitter Blue. Musk also cut off free access to Twitter API and charged enterprise customers $50,000 monthly to access it.


[ad_2]
Source link

Samsung to continue R&D investments in chips despite losses

andreasc
-
0
Samsung to continue R&D investments in chips despite losses
[ad_1]

Samsung‘s semiconductor division has had a horrible past few months. It posted its first-ever quarterly loss in 14 years in Q1 2023. The company’s foundry unit also lost some clients to rival TSMC due to poor yield rates. However, the Korean behemoth is determined to turn things around. And it plans to do that with continued R&D investments. At the same time, Samsung is also planning to cut the production of memory chips by about 25 percent.

In a recent interview, Samsung co-CEO Kyung Kye-hyun said that the company will stick to its planned capital expenditure in the research and development of next-gen semiconductors. The idea is to be ready to pounce when the market rebounds in the future.

The firm will raise wafer input to “gain the upper hand in technology for future products,” Kyung said during a recent staff business session. He leads the Device Solutions Division overseeing global memory operations at System LSI, which is Samsung’s semiconductor business unit.

According to The Korea Herald, Samsung invested a record KRW 6.58 trillion (roughly $4.9 billion) in research and development in the first quarter of 2023. Additionally, it also spent a record KRW 10.7 trillion (roughly $8 billion) on equipment and facility during the same period.

The total investment of KRW 17.28 trillion is about 27 times the company’s operating profit of KRW 640 billion (roughly $478 million) in Q1 2023. Samsung reportedly plans to invest a whopping $230 billion in the semiconductor business over the next 20 years. It is even ready to borrow money if needed but won’t scale back investment, unlike some other firms.

Samsung will scale back memory chips production

Samsung’s poor financial results in Q1 2023 were largely due to a steep decline in the prices of memory chips. The company is the world’s largest vendor of memory chips by a huge margin. A large amount of its profits came from the memory business in the past years. A price drop in recent months led to its profit dropping a staggering 96% this past quarter. It is also seemingly left with a huge inventory pile-up.

In its earnings report, Samsung hinted at a production cut of memory chips going forward. Industry analysts are suggesting that the company will reduce production by about 25 percent in the first half of this year. It could cut the production of both NAND flash and DRAM chips. Low-cost solutions like such as DDR3 and DDR4 could see a bigger cut, with Samsung focusing more resources on advanced memory chips like DDR5.

According to the latest industry data, the average contract price of 8GB DDR4 DRAM was $1.45 last Friday. That’s down almost 20 percent from a month earlier (via). The market saw a similar decline in January 2023 as well. Worst yet, research firms are estimating a continued decline in prices in the coming months.

“We achieved the biggest monthly sale for DRAM and NAND flash, but their price fell too much,” Kyung told the staff. “To deal with the drastic deterioration of the performance, we will take active measures,” he added, seemingly referring to inventory adjustments. But the Samsung executive is wary that the road ahead is equally tough.

“The [country’s] economic growth rate is expected to continue to go down. While we may not be able to avoid falling into deficit, we can still reduce it, and that is up to what we do in the remaining seven, eight months [of the year],” he said.


[ad_2]
Source link

Cisco Patched Known Vulnerability In IP Phone 7800, 8800 Series

andreasc
-
0
Cisco Patched Known Vulnerability In IP Phone 7800, 8800 Series
[ad_1]

Recently, Cisco has addressed a severe vulnerability affecting its IP Phone firmware that could allow remote code execution or DoS attacks. The vendor confirmed having detected PoC exploits for the stack overflow in its IP Phone 7800 and 8800 Series firmware.

Cisco IP Phone RCE Vulnerability Received A Fix

Sharing the details in a recent advisory, Cisco highlighted a high-severity vulnerability riddling its IP Phones 7800 and 8800 Series.

As explained, the vulnerability specifically affected the Cisco Discovery Protocol processing feature of the Cisco IP Phones. The bug appeared due to insufficient input validation of the incoming Cisco Discovery Protocol packets.

Consequently, it allowed an unauthenticated adversary to send maliciously crafted Cisco Discovery Protocol packets to the target devices to induce stack overflow. As a result, the attacker Could trigger denial-of-service or conduct RCE attacks on the target devices.

This vulnerability, CVE-2022-20968, received a high-severity rating with a CVSS score of 8.1. Cisco confirmed the existence of the PoC exploit code of the flaw in the public. However, it did not detect any malicious exploitations before releasing the vulnerability fix.

According to the timeline shared in the advisory, Cisco first disclosed this vulnerability in December 2022. However, it took the firm months to patch the vulnerability, releasing the fix only now.

The vulnerable devices include IP Phone 7800 Series and IP Phone 8800 Series (except Cisco Wireless IP Phone 8821) running the IP Phone firmware version 14.2 and earlier. Cisco released the patch with IP Phone firmware release 14.2(1) for the respective devices. It also credited Qian Chen of the Codesafe Team of Legendsec at QI-ANXIN Group for reporting this flaw to Cisco.

While the updates would automatically reach the relevant Cisco IP Phone users, users must check for any updates manually to ensure receiving the patch in time. Moreover, since Cisco confirmed having no workarounds for the vulnerability, updating the vulnerable devices at the earliest is even more critical.

Let us know your thoughts in the comments.


[ad_2]
Source link

The Pixel 7a’s rumored price makes it a hard sell

andreasc
-
0
The Pixel 7a’s rumored price makes it a hard sell
[ad_1]

We’re just over a week away from Google announcing the Pixel 7a, and a few other Pixel devices. But the Pixel 7a will likely be the best selling of the three new Pixel devices that are set to be announced at Google I/O on May 10.

This year, the rumor mill has given us pricing for the Pixel 7a, and it’s getting a price increase. This was expected, given how the prices of literally everything have jumped quite a bit in recent months. The rumors point to the Pixel 7a costing $499. That’s still a great price for a phone that will likely win the blind camera smartphone test once again.

However, there’s a problem. The Pixel 7 exists. The Pixel 7 debuted at $599, however over the past few months, it has been discounted to $499 quite often, and even $449 from time to time. So why would you buy a “mid-range” Pixel 7a, when the Pixel 7 exists at a lower or the same price. That’s going to make the Pixel 7a a tough sell for Google.

Pixel 7a leak Black 1

Pixel 7a specs are very similar to the Pixel 7

When you put the Pixel 7a and Pixel 7 side-by-side, the rumored specs and the official specs are pretty identical. The Pixel 7a will come with a 6.1-inch display, while the Pixel 7 has a 6.3-inch display. Otherwise, both are OLED 90Hz displays, and have the same resolution of 1080×2400. While we don’t know for sure, since it hasn’t leaked yet, the Pixel 7 will likely have a brighter display, as it is rated for 1400 nits peak brightness. It also supports HDR10+, while the leaks for the Pixel 7a point at just HDR.

Inside, both phones will sport the Google Tensor G2 chipset, with 8GB of RAM and 128GB of storage. The Pixel 7 does have a 256GB option, however.

The batteries are fairly similar with the Pixel 7a having a 4500mAh capacity battery and 4355mAh on the Pixel 7.

Where things really start to differ is in the cameras. The Pixel 7 has a 50-megapixel main sensor, 12-megapixel ultrawide and a 10.8-megapixel front-facing camera. On the Pixel 7a, it’s getting a new camera that Google has never used before. That is a 64-megapixel main sensor, and then a 12-megapixel ultrawide. And of course the 10.8-megapixel front-facing camera.

That’s a bit odd because Google typically will debut new hardware components on their flagships and then move them down to the a-series. Instead, Google is using a 64MP camera on the Pixel 7a, while the Pixel 7 and Pro both use a 50MP camera. This is a rumor that I don’t think will be true, but we have seen it from many sources. And this could be why the Pixel 7a is getting a price jump.

Could the Pixel 7a replace the Pixel 7?

This is very unlikely, because Google hasn’t done this before. But could Google use the Pixel 7a to replace the Pixel 7? The difference in their MSRPs is already only $100, so there’s a very small line between the two right now. But this is even more unlikely, since Google is rumored to be keeping the Pixel 6a around. Something that they don’t typically do.

Now if they do keep the Pixel 6a around at its regular sale price of $299, that would make this lineup quite impressive. With the Pixel 6a at $299, Pixel 7a at $499, Pixel 7 at $599 and Pixel 7 Pro at $899.

The Pixel 7a will be the best sub-$500 phone on the market

As is the case every year, since Google unveiled the Pixel 3a back in 2019, the Pixel 7a will be the best sub-$500 smartphone on the market. And that’s because it is basically a flagship smartphone, at a sort of mid-range price. One could argue that the $499 price is not really “mid-range” anymore. But it’s still quite affordable compared to say, the Galaxy S23 which starts at $799.

Pixel 7a will come with a new camera, but it will have all of Google’s smarts. Making it one of the best cameras on the market. Along with having 128GB of storage, which is not something we typically see at this price. Especially when paired with 8GB of RAM. Samsung’s new Galaxy A54 5G comes with 6GB and 128GB at the base price of $449. That’s only $50 less, for less RAM and the same storage. It does of course have a much larger battery inside, to make up for it.

Google Pixel 7a hands on leak image 2

Would you buy the Pixel 7 over the Pixel 7a?

This is a hard question, especially since the Pixel 7a isn’t out yet, so I haven’t had a chance to try it out. But given the MSRP of each phone – that’s $499 for Pixel 7a and $599 for Pixel 7 – it’s a really tough decision. I do prefer smaller phones, so that might be what tempts me to the Pixel 7a. But then again the Pixel 7 is not that large either.

This is something that a lot of people are going to struggle with, once the Pixel 7a is announced on May 10. Especially since it is set to be available that same day.


[ad_2]
Source link

Lyft, Clubhouse & Dropbox are laying off employees

andreasc
-
0
Lyft, Clubhouse & Dropbox are laying off employees
[ad_1]

Dropbox, Lyft, and Clubhouse are the latest companies that announced plans to lay off employees. The economic slowdown and the rise of AI are cited to be the reasons for recent layoffs.

Employees in tech companies are at the risk of losing their job more than ever. The tech industry is dealing with its greatest exodus, with tens of thousands of employees losing their jobs in 2023, and more is yet to come. Just in April, Meta said it would cut 10,000 jobs in the coming months, and Apple confirmed laying off staff in its corporate retail teams. Lyft, Clubhouse, and Dropbox are also joining the bandwagon.

The cloud storage giant Dropbox announced on April 27 that 500 employees would leave the company. This amount accounts for 16% of Dropbox’s total staff. The CEO, Drew Houston, said the layoffs are because of the slowing growth and the arrival of the “AI era.”

The Dropbox SEC filing reveals that the layoffs would cost the company $37 million to $42 million. Houston added that while Dropbox is profitable, its growth has been slowing due to the economic downturn that pressures both customers and the business.

The AI era of computing is another reason for Dropbox’s layoffs. “We’ve believed for many years that AI will give us new superpowers and completely transform knowledge work,” Houston noted. “And we’ve been building towards this future for a long time, as this year’s product pipeline will demonstrate.”

Lyft is axing 26% of its staff

The ride-sharing app Lyft is another company that confirmed removing 1,072 jobs, which equals 26% of the total staff. This is the second layoff by the company after it fired 13% of its staff in November last year. The affected employees will get severance and benefits valued at $47 million.

Lyft CEO and co-founder Logan Green has recently left the company, and former Amazon executive David Risher replaced him. Risher called for a renewed focus on the “needs of riders and drivers” and ordered remote employees to back to the office.

Clubhouse to layoff its staff again

The social audio app Clubhouse is also firing employees. The app, which exploded in popularity during the pandemic, has lost users’ attention and has declined since the pandemic ended.

The founders, Paul Davison and Rohan Seth sent employees a letter informing them about the decision to scale back the company by 50% and “say goodbye to many talented, dedicated teammates.” Despite the layoffs and reduced usage, Clubhouse founders said, “years of runway remaining.” They also confirmed building “Clubhouse 2.0.”


[ad_2]
Source link

OnePlus Pad Review: First time’s the charm!

andreasc
-
0
OnePlus Pad Review: First time’s the charm!
[ad_1]

We’ve been waiting for a tablet from OnePlus for years, and the company finally delivered. The OnePlus Pad is here, and Android Headlines was given the opportunity to review it. Is this a good first attempt at making a tablet, or is it back to the drawing board for OnePlus? Let’s find out.

By the way, this isn’t the only OnePlus device that launched this year. The company also launched the OnePlus 11. If you’re interested in checking out the company’s latest flagship phone, you can check out our review right here.

OnePlus Pad: Build and design

OnePlus really put a lot of love and care into the build and design of the OnePlus Pad. Design-wise, it’s rather simple. This tablet has a high-quality metal unibody that’s both sturdy and smooth to the touch. As opposed to Galaxy Tabs and iPads, the frame is rounded. The frame is only flat at the top to facilitate the stylus pen.

OnePlus Pad 10

The back of the tablet has a brushed metal look to it, but it’s extremely smooth to the touch. It looks nice, but it’s a definite fingerprint magnet. Also, you’ll want to watch what surfaces you place it on. It’s pretty slippery.

Overall, this is a tablet that undercuts most of the Galaxy Tabs and iPads in terms of price, but it doesn’t cut any corners in terms of build quality. It’s able to set itself apart from those tablets while remaining tough.

OnePlus Pad: Display

In my opinion, the display is the best aspect of this tablet; however, there is one drawback. Most tablets in this price range will opt for a 1080p (or similar) display. OnePlus opted for a display that’s between 2K and 3K. It has a resolution of 2880 x 2000, and it looks absolutely gorgeous.

This is an OLED display, so the colors pop throughout the software, and this makes watching media a treat. To top it off, it runs at 144Hz. So, not only is the display pleasantly saturated, but it’s also smooth as silk. So, I can honestly say that this device has the best display of any tablet that I’ve reviewed.

OnePlus Pad 11

The one drawback is the contrast. When I first powered on this tablet, I had to double-check to see if the display was actually OLED. For some reason, the blacks on this display aren’t truly black like you’d see on other OLED displays. They’re the hallmark dark gray that you see on LCD displays. That’s rather confusing, seeing as the colors are so saturated. That’s the only complaint that I have about the display.

OnePlus Pad: Speakers

OnePlus touted a powerful set of quad speakers for this tablet, and they are powerful, indeed. The set of speakers offers a loud and punchy sound when you’re watching content or listening to music. They’re loud and full enough to use this tablet without needing to take out your Bluetooth speaker.

That being said, the quality of the speakers isn’t really anything to write home about. They’re not terrible, but they’re definitely lacking in the immersion department. They get plenty loud, but the sound is very flat overall.

The thing is that nothing really pops out. It doesn’t matter if the song is more bass-heavy or emphasizes the higher frequencies, the sound profile is pretty flat. You can adjust the tuning with the Dolby Atmos sound settings, but they don’t do much to improve the sound.

OnePlus Pad 1

Overall, the speakers get the job done. They’re not bad, but they’re not great. If speaker quality is secondary to you, then they’ll serve you just fine.

OnePlus Pad: Performance

The OnePlus Pad uses the Dimensity 9000 SoC. This is MediaTek’s most powerful processor out at the time of writing this review, and it’s the company’s competitor to the latest Snapdragon SoCs. Going into this review, I expected top-of-the-line performance.

However, I was let down a bit. From a performance standpoint, the OnePlus Pad doesn’t particularly impress. I wouldn’t say that the experience is laggy overall, and it’s far from unusable. But, you get the hallmark experience of a device with a mid-range processor.

OnePlus Pad 8

Navigating the interface, you see a couple of stutters in the animations. The app drawer lags a bit, closing an app takes a second, etc. They’re few and far apart, but they do happen. When the interface hiccups while you’re not doing anything particularly labor-intensive, it’s never good for morale.

Gaming

When it comes to gaming, the story is the same as the general performance. It’s not bad. In fact, it’s pretty good. Most of the games you’ll get will run perfectly fine. 2D titles are no sweat, and most 3D games will run just fine. Sky: Children of Light is a good-looking 3D title and it will slow down most underpowered devices. It runs perfectly fine on the OnePlus Pad, and the same goes for Asphalt 9.

When it comes to more graphically-intensive games like Genshin Impact and Star Rail, you’ll start to see the performance dip, but not by much. I was able to play both games on full graphical settings and get relatively smooth gameplay, but there were stutters here and there while playing.

Action scenes with a lot of effects will be the main cause of stutters, and I saw them more often in Ganshin Impact. However, these games are more than playable on the tablet.

OnePlus Pad 2

If you’re looking to make this your gaming tablet, you will not be disappointed with the majority of the games on the market. Just know that the more demanding games will definitely push the OnePlus Pad to slow down a bit.

OnePlus Pad: Battery

The battery life on the OnePlus Pad is pretty middle-of-the-road. Using the tablet with several hours of gaming, video-watching, and writing, I was able to get about seven hours of screen-on time. That’s not bad considering that I had the brightness up to 100% and the display was set to 144Hz. Adjusting those settings will definitely push the battery a bit further, so it should be able to get you through the day.

If you have to top it off quickly, then OnePlus has you covered in that department. You get a 67W charger included in the box which is always nice to have. You’re able to charge the tablet from 0% to 100% in about 80 minutes which is great for a tablet.

OnePlus Pad: Software

Moving onto software, the OnePlus Pad is running OxygenOS 13 running on Android 13. Because it’s on Android 13, it’s running a version of Android that’s well formatted for tablets. You’ll see the revamped notification shade along with the new multitasking view and optimized Google apps.

OnePlus Pad 7

Since this is OxygenOS, you have access to a ton of customization tools. You have deep customizations for the app icons, animations, home screen transitions, theme, animation speed, and much more.

If you’re a OnePlus phone user, then you should feel at home with this software. OnePlus did a great job optimizing its software for the tablet form factor.

So, how did the company do on its first tablet?

This is OnePlus’ first time making a large-screen device, and I think the company knocked it out of the park. OnePlus was able to give us a tablet with a sturdy design, a beautiful and fluid display, good performance, a pretty good gaming experience, and perfectly optimized software while keeping the price within a reasonable range.

If you’re looking for a great tablet experience for a great price, then I recommend that you pick up the OnePlus Pad.

OnePlus Pad 5

You should buy this tablet if you:

  • Want an affordable tablet
  • Want a tablet with a gorgeous display
  • Want a tablet with stylus support
  • Want a tablet that’s good for gaming
  • Want a tablet for reading

You shouldn’t buy this tablet if you:

  • Want top-notch performance
  • Want great speakers
  • Need deep blacks in your picture

[ad_2]
Source link

Multiple Vulnerabilities Spotted In APC Easy UPS Software

andreasc
-
0
Multiple Vulnerabilities Spotted In APC Easy UPS Software
[ad_1]

Heads up, UPS users! Schneider Electric has patched numerous severe vulnerabilities in its APC Easy UPS Online Monitoring software. Exploiting these flaws could allow remote code execution and DoS attacks on target devices.

APC Easy Online Monitoring Software Vulnerabilities

According to a recent advisory from Schneider Electric, the vendors have patched three different security vulnerabilities in its APC Easy UPS Online Monitoring Software.

Specifically, two of these vulnerabilities could allow remote code execution attacks from an adversary. Whereas a third vulnerability could let the attacker induce denial of service on the target devices.

Below is a quick review of these vulnerabilities.

  • CVE-2023-29411 (CVSS 9.8): It’s a critical severity vulnerability that could allow an attacker to modify admin credentials. Exploiting the flaw could lead to remote code execution on the Java RMI interface. Schneider Electric has credited the researcher Esjay from the Trend Micro Zero Day Initiative for reporting the vulnerability.
  • CVE-2023-29412 (CVSS 9.8): Another critical severity flaw that existed due to improper handling of case sensitivity. Exploiting the flaw could allow a remote attacker to manipulate internal methods via the Java RMI interface and execute codes. This vulnerability caught the attention of two researchers, Esjay from the Trend Micro Zero Day Initiative and Nicholas Miles from the Tenable Network Security.
  • CVE-2023-29413 (CVSS 7.5): It’s a high-severity vulnerability that could allow an unauthenticated adversary to induce denial of service on the target Schneider UPS Monitor service. The advisory acknowledges Esjay from Trend Micro ZDI for reporting this issue.

Recommended Mitigations And Patched Updates

The vendor explained that these vulnerabilities affect the Easy Ups Software clients for Windows 10 and 11 and Windows Server 2016, 2019, and 2022. However, Schneider Electric has presently released the patches for the Windows 10 version only. The updated software versions include the APC Easy UPS Online Monitoring Software Version V2.5-GA-01-23036 and Schneider Electric Easy UPS Online Monitoring Software version V2.5-GS-01-23036.

Nonetheless, for Windows 11 and Windows Server 2016, 2019, and 2022 users, the vendors recommend updating the Easy UPS units with the PowerChute Serial Shutdown (PCSS) software on all servers protected by your Easy UPS On-Line (SRV, SRVL models) as mitigation.

Let us know your thoughts in the comments.


[ad_2]
Source link
1...1,2561,2571,258...1,452Page 1,257 of 1,452