Breach Forums Return to Clearnet and Dark Web Despite FBI Seizure

0
[ad_1]

Breach Forums returns to the clearnet and dark web just two weeks after the FBI seized its infrastructure and arrested two administrators. One of the admins, ShinyHunters, regained domains despite the FBI’s efforts, highlighting significant operational setbacks and security lapses.

The notorious cybercrime and hacking forum, Breach Forums, has returned to the clearnet and dark web just two weeks after the FBI seized its entire infrastructure. The FBI arrested two administrators in the process.

The operation began on May 15, 2024, when the FBI seized all domains belonging to Breach Forums in a coordinated international effort. The next day, Hackread.com published an exclusive report revealing how ShinyHunters, the hacker and main administrator of Breach Forums, managed to regain the seized domain from right under the nose of the FBI by contacting the Hong Kong-based domain registrar, NiceNIC.

The notorious cybercrime and hacking forum, Breach Forums, has returned to the clearnet and dark web just two weeks after the FBI seized its entire infrastructure. The FBI allegedly arrested two administrators in the process. 

The operation began on May 15, 2024, when the FBI seized all domains belonging to Breach Forums in a coordinated international effort. The next day, Hackread.com published an exclusive report revealing how ShinyHunters, the hacker and main administrator of Breach Forums, managed to regain the seized domain from right under the nose of the FBI by contacting the Hong Kong-based domain registrar, NiceNIC.

But how did ShinyHunters regain the clearnet domains?

While the forum has adopted a new domain for the dark web, as the original could not be regained from the FBI, it is back online with the original clearnet domain (breachforums.st). Other associated clearnet domains, including escrow.breachforums.st, breached.in, and two other parked domains, have also been regained from the FBI's seizure.

ShinyHunters shared an email claiming it was an official conversation between an FBI computer scientist from the agency's Cyber Division and NiceNIC, the domain registrar. The email, seen by Hackread.com, provides an in-depth background into the incident and how the hacker admin regained access to the seized domains.

The FBI's Email

According to the letter, the FBI's Cyber Division conducted an operation on May 15, 2024, against Breach Forums, seizing several domains, including breachforums.st, hosted by NiceNIC. The domains were seized legally via a court-ordered warrant.

However, a few hours after the seizure, the breachforums.st domain was returned to the original owner, ShinyHunters, and the FBI's NiceNIC account, registered as "bf_fbi," was suspended.

The FBI then requested NiceNIC to reactivate their account and return the seized domains, citing NiceNIC's terms of service, which prohibit the promotion of cybercrime. The agency urged that if the domains could not be returned, the nameservers should be changed to FBI-owned servers or the domains should be suspended to prevent further harm.

NiceNIC's response to the FBI remains unknown. However, the fact that the domain has returned in its original form suggests that the company did not comply with the FBI's request.

Email Conversation 

Here is the email conversation as seen by Hackread.com: (Note: The name of the FBI agent has been removed from the email due to security and privacy reasons).

FBI Mail to Registrar: 

I'm a Computer Scientist within the FBI's Cyber Division, and I'm one of the primary point-of-contacts for any domain operations for the FBI. Earlier this week, on May 15th, 2024, the FBI had conducted an operation against the illicit forum and marketplace 'BreachForums'. 

Some public cybersecurity outlets caught wind of the actions, and posted articles on the domain seizure and subsequent splash page. On the morning of the operation, the FBI seized control of a few domains associated with BreachForums, including breachforums.st and others, that were hosted by NiceNic. We were able to lawfully seize them by serving a court-ordered seizure warrant on an account owner located in the United States. 

All of the websites that we seized from the account were dedicated to the theft, sale, and sharing of data stolen from victims around the world. Ultimately, our efforts to take down BreachForums were done to prevent any further damage done by the website to countless victims globally.

However, a few hours after the seizure of the domains, around May 15th at 9PM PST, we noticed that the breachforums.st domain was released from our custody and given back to the original threat actor. We also noticed that we were unable to log into our official FBI account at NiceNic, which was registered with the email breachforums@fbi.gov (username: bf_fbi), leading us to believe that the account was suspended.

As such, I was wanting to provide some additional context around the situation to hopefully overturn the account suspension, in addition to returning the lawfully-seized domains back to the FBI NiceNic account.

Additionally, within your domain registration terms of service, you reference that the services will not be used to "promote hacking, cracking, or other cyber crimes or activities", which is a common activity found within and associated with BreachForums. 

If the domains cannot be returned to the FBI, we would kindly request that the nameservers be changed to FBI-owned nameservers or suspended via a clientHold to prevent further harm in accordance to your terms of service. The NiceNic account which currently holds the domains, 'vincenzotroia', has actively disregarded and broken your service agreements by continuing to host these domains.

I look forward to hearing back from you - we would all really appreciate any help or guidance that you might be able to provide on the situation.

Respectfully,

S***

Embarrassing Situation for The FBI

The situation is quite embarrassing for the FBI. Despite their efforts to seize the domains of Breach Forums and take down its infrastructure, the fact that the forum was able to quickly regain its original clearnet domains highlights several issues including operational setbacks, security lapses, public perception, and legal and procedural concerns.

This also explains why, despite two weeks having passed, the FBI or the DoJ has not published press releases detailing the seizure. Nevertheless, this situation is a win-win for cybercriminals, but the next move from the FBI and other law enforcement agencies involved in the operation will be crucial to watch.
Breach Forums domain urging users to register to view its content (Screenshot: Hackread.com)

But how did ShinyHunters regain the clearnet domains?

While the forum has adopted a new domain for the dark web, as the original could not be regained from the FBI, it is back online with the original clearnet domain (breachforums.st). Other associated clearnet domains, including escrow.breachforums.st, breached.in, and two other parked domains, have also been regained from the FBI’s seizure.

ShinyHunters shared an email claiming it was an official conversation between an FBI computer scientist from the agency’s Cyber Division and NiceNIC, the domain registrar. The email, seen by Hackread.com, provides an in-depth background into the incident and how the hacker admin regained access to the seized domains.

The FBI’s Email

According to the letter, the FBI’s Cyber Division conducted an operation on May 15, 2024, against Breach Forums, seizing several domains, including breachforums.st, hosted by NiceNIC. The domains were seized legally via a court-ordered warrant.

However, a few hours after the seizure, the breachforums.st domain was returned to the original owner, ShinyHunters, and the FBI’s NiceNIC account, registered as “bf_fbi,” was suspended.

The FBI then requested NiceNIC to reactivate their account and return the seized domains, citing NiceNIC’s terms of service, which prohibit the promotion of cybercrime. The agency urged that if the domains could not be returned, the nameservers should be changed to FBI-owned servers or the domains should be suspended to prevent further harm.

NiceNIC’s response to the FBI remains unknown. However, the fact that the domain has returned in its original form suggests that the company did not comply with the FBI’s request.

Email Conversation

Here is the email conversation as seen by Hackread.com: (Note: The name of the FBI agent has been removed from the email due to security and privacy reasons).

FBI Mail to Registrar: 

I'm a Computer Scientist within the FBI's Cyber Division, and I'm one of the primary point-of-contacts for any domain operations for the FBI. Earlier this week, on May 15th, 2024, the FBI had conducted an operation against the illicit forum and marketplace 'BreachForums'.

Some public cybersecurity outlets caught wind of the actions, and posted articles on the domain seizure and subsequent splash page. On the morning of the operation, the FBI seized control of a few domains associated with BreachForums, including breachforums.st and others, that were hosted by NiceNic. We were able to lawfully seize them by serving a court-ordered seizure warrant on an account owner located in the United States.

All of the websites that we seized from the account were dedicated to the theft, sale, and sharing of data stolen from victims around the world. Ultimately, our efforts to take down BreachForums were done to prevent any further damage done by the website to countless victims globally.

However, a few hours after the seizure of the domains, around May 15th at 9PM PST, we noticed that the breachforums.st domain was released from our custody and given back to the original threat actor. We also noticed that we were unable to log into our official FBI account at NiceNic, which was registered with the email [email protected] (username: bf_fbi), leading us to believe that the account was suspended.

As such, I was wanting to provide some additional context around the situation to hopefully overturn the account suspension, in addition to returning the lawfully-seized domains back to the FBI NiceNic account.

Additionally, within your domain registration terms of service, you reference that the services will not be used to "promote hacking, cracking, or other cyber crimes or activities", which is a common activity found within and associated with BreachForums.

If the domains cannot be returned to the FBI, we would kindly request that the nameservers be changed to FBI-owned nameservers or suspended via a clientHold to prevent further harm in accordance to your terms of service. The NiceNic account which currently holds the domains, 'vincenzotroia', has actively disregarded and broken your service agreements by continuing to host these domains.

I look forward to hearing back from you - we would all really appreciate any help or guidance that you might be able to provide on the situation.

Respectfully,

S***

Embarrassing Situation for The FBI

The situation is quite embarrassing for the FBI. Despite their efforts to seize the domains of Breach Forums and take down its infrastructure, the fact that the forum was able to quickly regain its original clearnet domains highlights several issues including operational setbacks, security lapses, public perception, and legal and procedural concerns.

This also explains why, despite two weeks having passed, the FBI or the DoJ has not published press releases detailing the seizure. Nevertheless, this situation is a win-win for cybercriminals, but the next move from the FBI and other law enforcement agencies involved in the operation will be crucial to watch.

  1. New Soap2day Domains Emerge Despite Legal Challenges
  2. Data Breach at New BreachForums: 4,000 members’ data leaked
  3. AT&T breach? ShinyHunters selling AT&T database with 70M SSN
  4. FBI Seizes RaidForums, Arrests Alleged Founder Diogo Santos Coelho
  5. BreachForums Owner Pompompurin Gets 20-Year Supervised Sentence

[ad_2]
Source link

Poco F6 Pro Review: You've done it again, Poco!

0
[ad_1]
Poco F6 Pro Review

There are several types of devices dotting the mobile tech landscape. There are flagships, mid-rangers, and budget phones. But, what happens when a mid-ranger accidentally forgets that it’s a mid-ranger and steps into the flagship space? Well, you get one of the greatest kinds of phones out there, the Flagship Killer. The Xiaomi Poco brand has been pumping out phones like these over the years, and it doesn’t seem to be stopping anytime soon. I had the opportunity to review the Poco F6 Pro. Does this phone uphold the Poco brand lineage? Let’s find out!

In case you don’t know about the Poco series, it came about in 2018 with the first phone sporting the most powerful Snapdragon chip of the day. This, coupled with some other flagship specs, made the roughly $299 price point seem like a typo. However, back in that day, the term “Flagship Killer” was in full swing, so it was just another one for the pile.

Now, in 2024, the term Flagship Killer is in flux, as the line between flagship and budget phones has blurred. So, the Poco F6 Pro has a lot of weight to pull if it wants to achieve that title.

Before jumping into this review, I recently reviewed the Poco F6. This is the less-expensive version of the F6 Pro, and it proved to be much more powerful than its price had let on. With a beautiful design, nice display, excellent performance, decent camera, and overall solid experience, it proved to be a true flagship killer. You can read my review of the Poco F6 to see if it’s the phone that you should be picking up.

Poco F6 Pro Review: Design

Let’s start off with the design. I mentioned that the Poco F6’s design was beautiful and that it had a mixture of two mentalities. The Pro version strays far from that design philosophy. The colorway I’m reviewing is the white version, and I’m glad I got this color because it’s jaw-dropping.

The back glass of the phone has a pattern on it that’s not just printed onto it; it looks like it was etched into the glass itself. There are abstract patterns that cover the back of the glass, and they all seem to flow in one direction. Since I got the white color, it reminds me of wintery winds blowing across the back. The patterns play with the light, and that gives it a bit of a 3D appearance to it.

The pattern on the back is the most flashy aspect of the design, as everything else is pretty standard. There’s a rectangular glass panel that stretches across the back of the phone that houses the cameras. Next to the cameras, there’s the “Poco” text with the resolution of the main camera right under it. This, with the square arrangement of the camera, and the overall boxy shape of the phone gives it that certain brick-like aesthetic.

Poco F6 Pro (9)

It’s similar to the Poco F6 in that its very stern stature is juxtaposed with its very pretty colorway. It’s a fashion piece that looks premium and sturdy. Honestly, I fell in love with the design the instant I laid eyes on it. Poco has mastered the art of creating a device that both gives off the appearance of style and stability.

Poco F6 Pro Review: Build quality

In My Poco F6 review, I remarked that one of the biggest tells of an affordable device is the build quality. A phone can look as pretty as a shiny gold necklace but be made from cheap parts. The Poco F6 didn’t feel bad at all, but you could tell that Poco was pretty liberal with the plastic parts.

Well, that’s not the case with the Poco F6 Pro. Once I picked this up, I knew that Poco wasn’t pulling any punches on the build quality. The back is made from glass and not plastic, and when I touched the frame, I felt the cool sensation of metal. Honestly, this is a great-feeling phone. It’s one of the attributes of this that fool you into thinking that it costs double its actual price.

Another thing that can affect the feeling in the hand is the weight. Plastic comes at a price, and that’s the weight. When you hold a more expensive phone from Samsung, Google, or Apple, you know that you’re holding a quality device because they all feel heavy in the hand. They’re relatively thin, so you get this feeling of density with them. It feels like the internal space of the phone is being completely used up without any empty space.

This is the case with the Poco F6 Pro. I admit that it doesn’t feel quite as heavy as an iPhone or Galaxy phone, but it’s not far behind. When I pick up this phone, there’s a very satisfying heft to it. It makes me feel that Poco shelled out for materials that are meant to withstand the test of time. I know that I’m going to be holding onto this phone for quite some time.

I also performed a light bend test to listen for any sort of creaks or groans from the materials. I’m happy to report that there weren’t any. I’m not surprised; this is not a pencil-thin phone. Poco delivered a beefy handset, and I’m all for it.

Overall, this is a quality-built phone with a premium feeling in the hand. It covered all of the places where the Poco F6’s build quality lagged behind.

Poco F6 Pro Review: Display

The Poco F6 Pro’s display is a bit of a funny story. It’s tough to put a score on it because it’s so customizable. I’ll judge it using the setting that people are most likely to use, and that’s the Saturated setting. There are different ways that you can customize it, so I’ll explain them later on in this section. But, let’s start off with the…

Brightness

We’re at a point in smartphone development where sunlight visibility should not be an issue whatsoever. All of the top-tier phones hitting the market are more than bright enough to tackle direct sunlight. When it comes to more affordable phones, they’re making steps in that direction, and I’ve reviewed phones with really bright displays like the Tecno Camon 30.

In the case of the Poco F6 Pro, it brings the goods in terms of on-paper specs, but things are a little different in the real world. Don’t get me wrong, when I exit the house and walk into the bright Florida sun, the screen brightness soars. The screen is bright enough to be seen perfectly fine out in the sun. I didn’t have any issues making out text, watching videos, playing games, or otherwise interacting with the phone.

Back in the day, using a phone in the sun involved covering the screen with my hand, ducking under shade, or squinting. However, phone displays are far past the point where I can just take out the phone and use it as easily as if I were inside. So, when it comes to sunlight visibility, I have no complaints.

On paper, Poco states that this display can reach an eye-watering 4000 nits of peak brightness, but I’m not sure when that phone would need to be pushed to that point. Digging through the specs page of this phone, I found that it reaches a brightness of 1200 nits in High Brightness Mode. This is the mode that will boost the brightness when you’re in the sun.

Poco F6 Pro (7)

Well, if the phone can reach 4000 nits of brightness, it would be nice to have it reach 2000 nits in the sun, at least. The screen is perfectly visible when in with its 1200-nit brightness, but I think that it could be just a bit brighter. It has the ability to go up against the likes of Samsung, Apple, Google, and OnePlus with its peak brightness.

Colors

Moving onto the colors, I’ll be reviewing the Saturated mode, as this is the mode that people will most likely use. It boosts the color saturation to give you a nice and punchy viewing experience.

The display of the Poco F6 Pro is a lesson that screen calibration is as important as the screen technology. We’re all conditioned to assume that OLED panels automatically mean ultra-saturated colors. However, that’s not always the case.

With the Poco F6 Pro, I found that the colors had gotten a nice and pleasing boost. I can see that the colors were pretty juicy, and that can make watching movies a treat. Certain parts of the UI pop off of the screen like app icons, UI elements, buttons, menus, etc. This gives the interface a nice little splash of color. It makes navigating the software that much better.

However, I think that, even with the Saturated mode enabled, the colors are a bit reserved compared to other screens. The colors are a bit punchy, but they’re not as juicy as the displays on phones like those from Tecno, Infinix, and Samsung that I’ve reviewed.

I wouldn’t say that it’s an issue. I don’t think that the colors feel bland or lifeless. They do make the screen look nice. However, I’ve reviewed some devices with LCD displays that can reach this level of color saturation like the OnePlus Pad and Samsung Galaxy S9 FE (Review).

So, the display saturation on the Poco F6 Pro is noticeably just a step behind in terms of saturation, but it’s not a major issue. If you’re craving ultra-saturated colors from your screen, you might be a bit disappointed.

Color adjustments

When it comes to the adjustments that you can make to the display, Poco really outdid itself. This way, you can truly customize the screen to suit your specific tastes. The software offers more settings than most other phones, and this includes more expensive handsets.

Starting off, there are three color saturation modes that you can choose from. I already talked about the Saturated setting, but there are two additional settings that you can pick. The Original color PRO mode will give you the most realistic color profile. It will reduce the saturation which will give everything a more natural tone. It’s for people who just want a screen to display content and don’t care about flashy colors.

With the Vivid mode, the software will automatically adjust the color saturation based on the content that you’re watching. So, you’ll see the color profile change when you switch to different types of content. You’ll want this if you want the colors chosen algorithmically.

20240603 180750

The Saturated setting will boost the colors to their fullest saturation. Not only can you adjust the saturation, but you’re also able to change the color temperature. You’ll see a color wheel that will allow you to manually adjust the color temperature. This gives you the entire color spectrum to steer the color temperature of the screen. You’re not only tied to sandy yellow and icy blue. If you want to give your screen a green tone, you can. If you want it to be orange, purple, teal, or any other color, you have the option. You can also adjust how intense you want the color to be.

The adjustments go deeper than that, as there’s an additional page of settings that lets you further adjust the colors of your screen. You have the option between three color gamuts. Out of the box, it’s set to choose the gamut based on the content on your screen. If you want to choose for yourself, you have the option between P3 and sRGB.

Under the color gamut options, you’ll see the color space section with separate Red, Green, and Blue sliders. Below that, you’ll have a Hue slider with a Saturation and Contrast slider under that. These allow you to further fine-tune the colors.

Rounding out the settings, you have a slider for your Contrast and Gamma.

Overall

This is a display that shines in just how versatile it is. If you’re looking for the best and juiciest display experience out of the box, then you might want to pass this phone up. It doesn’t produce the punchiest colors out of the box, but that’s not a bad thing. This display is for people who like to tinker. It’s for people who want their display to appear a certain way.

In terms of brightness, it gets bright enough to see comfortably in the bright sunlight, and it can go much higher. Take these with the 120Hz refresh rate, and I have to say that this phone has a pretty great display. I’ve definitely seen more impressive displays, but its versatility is second to few.

Poco F6 Pro Review: Speakers

When dealing with more affordable phones, the speaker quality can be hit or miss. It’s understandable, as the speaker quality is sometimes sacrificed to save on cost. This is felt with many of Tecno’s and Infinix’s phones. However, there are some phones that don’t compromise on the speaker quality as much, and I think that the Poco F6 and Poco F6 Pro are two of them.

The former was able to impress me during my testing, and I didn’t expect the quality to be very different between it and the Pro version. I ran the Pro through the same tests that I ran the Poco F6 through. Aside from listening to the speakers in my day-to-day life, I used six different test tracks that emphasize different aspects of the sound: Loudness, Bass, Treble, Balance, Vocals, and Immersion.

Loudness

One thing that I remarked about in my Poco F6 review was how quiet the speakers were compared to other phones that I reviewed. They weren’t extremely quiet, and they’re more than loud enough for personal listening.

I have the same feeling towards the speakers in the Poco F6 Pro. They get plenty loud for personal and indoor listening. However, when taking them outside or in a noisy environment, you’ll have trouble hearing them even at full volume.

20240603 180820

The test piece I used was a loud rock piece. I placed a sound meter a foot away from the phone and blasted the rock piece at full volume. The sound meter peaked at 85dB. That’s a bit lower than some of the other phones I reviewed.

Bass

Smartphone speakers typically lack in the bass department. They’re smaller speakers, so they aren’t the best at reproducing lower tones. In any case, several phone manufacturers were able to make speakers with some impressive bass.

In the case of the Poco F6 Pro, I’d say that the bass reproduction is notably good. The test piece consists of lower instruments like Double Basses, Bassoons, Contra Bassoons, and Tubas along with higher instruments to fill out the sound. I could hear the tone of the lower instruments along with a fair amount of the rumble. The lower end sounds full and warm, and it greatly contributes to the overall sound. I’d say that it’s a few steps behind what you’d hear from a Galaxy phone or iPhone, but it’s still pleasant.

Treble

While focusing on bass, you don’t want to forget about the treble. The higher tones also contribute to the overall sound, and good treble can be make-or-break in certain cases.

The test piece that I used involved Piano, Celeste, Violins, and Flute along with the rest of the ensemble, and it really accentuated the upper registers of notes. Overall, I think that the speakers did a good job of projecting those instruments.

The thing I was listening for was clarity with these instruments. What I was listening for was how crisp those higher instruments sounded. The speakers did a good job, but I wasn’t as impressed as I was with the bass. The instruments projected pretty nicely, but I think that they could have sounded just a little clearer.

Balance

Another aspect of audio that’s typically overlooked is the balance. The bass and treble are important, but what’s also important is how they play together. The test piece I used was pretty balanced with a fair amount of both low end and high end.

In terms of overall balance, I think that these speakers struck a nice middle ground between high and low. The piece in question has a combination of lower-end thumps and higher-end tones, and they both projected nicely. The treble, by itself, could be a bit clearer, but it still sounds good in a mix. The Poco F6 Pro is able to produce a nicely balanced sound.

Poco F6 Pro (6)

Vocals

If you plan on using these speakers to listen to a lot of songs, then the way that they project vocals is very important. You’ll want to make sure that the voices are able to project through the rest of the music.

In terms of vocal performance, I think that these speakers are fantastic. Listening to the test piece and other songs, I found that the voices of the singers sounded crisp and clear. I could hear the unique texture of their voices.

Immersion

In terms of overall immersion, I think that everything comes together to make an immersive sound. If you plan on watching movies, then you’ll be very immersed in the action. The sound is lush, warm, and wide.

Overall

I’ve reviewed my fair share of affordable phones, and some of them were able to produce some decent results. Overall, I think that the Poco F6 is one of the best performances that I reviewed. The sound is really good, and I’d feel comfortable listening to music or watching movies without needing to reach for a pair of headphones.

Poco F6 Pro Review: Performance

Sure, the phone’s pretty, has a nice display, and has some good speakers, but how does it perform? One of the things that characterized the first Poco phone was the fact that Xiaomi stuck a flagship-grade processor in it. This phone was sporting the Snapdragon 845, and that was one of the things that turned heads.

This time around, Xiaomi didn’t quite repeat what it did with the first one, but it’s still nothing to scoff at. The company fitted this phone with a Snapdragon 8 Gen 2. This is the major flagship processor powering the most powerful phones last year. So, while this phone is technically using year-old silicon, that doesn’t mean that it’s sluggish by any stretch of the imagination.

Out of the box, this phone gave me nothing but snappy performance. I didn’t see a single dropped frame, stutter in the UI, or anything of the sort.

Poco F6 Pro (2)

The same goes for opening and using apps. None of the apps I used showed any sign of slowing this phone down. Even while using this phone for a while and increasing the load, the Poco F6 Pro still powered through without so much as a hitch. This is truly flagship phone behavior. If you’re worried about an affordable phone having sluggish performance, you won’t need to. This phone flies!

The numbers

I know that benchmark scores aren’t a proper way to judge a phone’s performance. However, here are a few scores for those of you who are interested.

I ran the Poco F6 Pro through Geekbench 6. It got a single-core score of 1407, which isn’t great as far as flagship phones go. Being an older processor, it lags behind the Galaxy S24 series, but it actually scored considerably lower than the Galaxy S23 series, and they’re using the same processor. Those phones scored between 1884 and 1902.

What’s weird is that the Poco F6 Pro actually scored a bit lower than the Poco F5, which scored 1457. That phone uses the Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2. However, don’t disregard this phone just yet, as it was able to take some victories in the multi-core department.

It got a multi-core score of 5229. That score is actually higher than the scores achieved by the Galaxy S23 phones. In fact, this phone’s score was only beaten out by the Galaxy S24 phones.

So, it’s not pulling a lot of weight when it comes to single-core performance, but it’s a multi-core beast.

Poco F6 Pro Review: Gaming performance

Since the Poco F6 Pro is such a powerful performer, you should expect its gaming chops to be similarly impressive. Sometimes, phones can smoothly navigate through the software and run apps but fall short when it comes to gaming. However, when you’re dealing with flagship silicon, good general performance and gaming performance usually go hand-in-hand.

Before jumping in, it’s important to note that the Poco F6 Pro has a tool called Game Turbo. Using this tool, you’re able to boost the gaming performance to get the most out of the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2. During my testing, I used this game booster mode.

Even though I knew that there was no need to, I played a simple 2D game to test the performance. Unsurprisingly, Survivor.io ran like a dream. I chose this game because it’s one of those 2D games that can have a ton of sprites on the screen at the same time. It could prove to be a problem for weaker hardware.

Next up, I played my usual collection of mid-range 3D games. These are games that are graphically intensive and able to slow down cheaper phones. Be that as it may, they still fall short of the most graphically intensive games on the market.

20240603 183151

The games I’m talking about are Dragon Ball Legends, Sky: Children of The Light, and Asphalt 9. At no point did I see any dropped frames or stutters. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 was able to conquer those games without breaking a sweat. I didn’t expect to have any issues with those games at all, so the phone was just delivering on the promise that the 8 Gen 2 is still a powerful performer.

Genshin Impact and Star Rail

You knew that this was coming; what’s the point of testing a phone’s gaming chops if I don’t include some of the prettiest games on the market? I’m talking about Genshin Impact and Honkai Star Rail. These games look like they should be on the PS3 and Xbox 360, and they’re able to cook most other phones. During my testing, I played both games with their graphics cranked up to their highest settings.

Star Rail is a little less demanding than Genshin in certain respects, but it gets intense during battles and in towns. While I was playing the game, I didn’t notice because the gameplay was consistently smooth. Some weaker phones would start to show signs of slowing down during special attacks in battles, but the Poco F6 Pro maintained the full 60fps. The same goes for the town scene. Everything was fluid.

The story is the same for Genshin Impact. We all know how lovely that game looks, and many of us are used to turning the graphics down just to get a usable frame rate. I turned all of the graphic settings up and even kept the useless motion blur on. It didn’t matter what I did, I still got fluid gameplay.

If the Poco F6 Pro can tackle these games this easily, then you shouldn’t need to worry about any other game bogging this phone down any time soon. The Poco F6 Pro ran these games smoothly, and I expected nothing less from the flagship-grade Snapdragon 8 Gen 2.

20240603 181100

Poco F6 Pro Review: Battery

What use is playing games on your phone if it can’t last a good gaming session? One of the high points of the Poco F6 was the battery life. It lasted quite some time while displaying a 24-hour video.

I performed the same test with the Poco F6 Pro, but the results weren’t as impressive. The Poco F6 lasted 18 hours and 17 minutes on a charge, but the Pro variant lasted 14 hours and 35 minutes. I’m wondering if it’s because of the processor. The Poco F6 uses the Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 while the Pro uses the 8 Gen 2. Since the 8s Gen 3 is newer, even though it might not be more powerful, Qualcomm may have made some efficiency improvements.

As such, you won’t be getting quite the mileage that the Poco F6 has. Still, you’ll be able to have decent battery life with the Poco 6 Pro. Using it in my daily life, I was able to push the battery past a day and a half on a single charge. This is with typical use with some gaming, picture-taking, and other activities. If you’re planning on having an extended gaming session or movie-watching session, then you’re sure to see it conk out after about a day.

So, overall, the battery life on this phone is pretty decent. It’s not bad, but it’s nothing to write home about. It falls behind phones like the iPhone 15 and the Galaxy S24 series.

Poco F6 Pro (5)

As for the charging, this phone supports up to 120W of charging. That’s absolutely neck-breaking, but I wasn’t able to test it out. I was sent a model with a non-American charging brick. However, you will be able to charge this phone from 0% to 100% in less than 40 minutes. So, if you do find yourself low on battery power, all you have to do is plug it in for a few minutes, and you should have enough juice to last you the rest of your day.

Poco F6 Pro Review: Camera

A telltale sign of an affordable phone is a bad camera sometimes. This makes sense, as several flagship phones don’t even have good cameras. However, the camera technology in affordable phones has gotten better over the years. The cameras in affordable phones have become more useful as time goes on, and there are some phones that stand out. In the case of the Poco F6 Pro, I think that this is a solid performer in the camera department.

Details

Starting off, I think that it did a good job of capturing finer details in the shot. I’m able to zoom into the image a fair bit before I start to see it degrade. There are some phones with similar resolutions that get blurry faster. The Poco F6 has a 50MP camera that most likely bins down to about 12MP for its pictures. If you want to capture more details, you can use the 50MP mode to use the maximum number of pixels.

Poco F6 Pro Camera Samples (15)
Poco F6 Pro Camera Samples (10)
Poco F6 Pro Camera Samples (15)
Poco F6 Pro Camera Samples (10)

Exposure/contrast

In terms of exposure, I don’t really have complaints. I think that the images that this phone produces come out pretty well-exposed. The Poco F6 tended to expose a bit bright, but the Pro was able to produce a more balanced image.

Also, I don’t really have any complaints about the contrast. The camera does a fair job of producing contrasty images. I think that, while this is the case, the camera crushes the shadows a bit in darker areas. It’s not too bad, however. In the image of the trees, I’m still able to see a fair amount of detail in the shadowy parts.

Poco F6 Pro Camera Samples (16)
Poco F6 Pro Camera Samples (11)
Poco F6 Pro Camera Samples (17)
Poco F6 Pro Camera Samples (16)
Poco F6 Pro Camera Samples (11)
Poco F6 Pro Camera Samples (17)

Colors

In terms of colors, it seems like there are two different mentalities between the Poco F6 and Poco F6 Pro. Whereas the Poco F6 keeps its colors more in line, the Pro pushes the saturation a bit.

I think that the phone pushes the colors the right amount to create a pleasant-looking image. I find that greens look the best. They pop out of the image without going too far. There’s also a nice balance between warmer and cooler colors. You can see this in the image of the Moses-in-the-cradles below. Both the greens and purples look nice.

 

Poco F6 Pro Camera Samples (14)
Poco F6 Pro Camera Samples (22)
Poco F6 Pro Camera Samples (14)
Poco F6 Pro Camera Samples (22)

I wasn’t too impressed with how the sky was presented in these images. I felt that the camera could have added just a bit more color to it.

Poco F6 Pro Camera Samples (12)

When it comes to warmer colors, the camera does a nice job. The image of the yellow flower is beautiful, and I really like how the colors of the orange and brown leaves look.

Poco F6 Pro Camera Samples (13)
Poco F6 Pro Camera Samples (9)
Poco F6 Pro Camera Samples (13)
Poco F6 Pro Camera Samples (9)

If there’s one area where the colors are weak, I’d say it’s the reds. Typically, smartphone sensors have a hard time exposing reds. They sometimes wind up boosting the saturation to eye-watering lengths, and that’s what happened here. Looking at the image of the red flowers and the red on the leaves, you can see where the camera struggled with the balance. The pipe wasn’t too bad, but the image is still much more saturated than in real life.

Poco F6 Pro Camera Samples (18)
Poco F6 Pro Camera Samples (21)
Poco F6 Pro Camera Samples (20)
Poco F6 Pro Camera Samples (18)
Poco F6 Pro Camera Samples (21)
Poco F6 Pro Camera Samples (20)

Low light

When it comes to the low light performance, I think that this phone is a solid performer. Indoors with typical lightbulbs on, this camera had no trouble soaking up a good amount of light and capturing some nice details. It’s able to produce pleasant images under these lighting conditions.

Poco F6 Pro Camera Samples (8)
Poco F6 Pro Camera Samples (6)
Poco F6 Pro Camera Samples (8)
Poco F6 Pro Camera Samples (6)

Turning off the lights, the only light source in my room was my computer monitor. While that’s the case, the camera was still able to capture a fairly-detailed image. It took a one-second exposure to get all the details it needed, and the results were nice.

Poco F6 Pro Camera Samples (5)
Poco F6 Pro Camera Samples (3)
Poco F6 Pro Camera Samples (5)
Poco F6 Pro Camera Samples (3)

I then walked over to an even darker part of my room and took a picture of the headphones. For this image, the camera took a three-second exposure and it was able to expose the image nicely.

Poco F6 Pro Camera Samples (1)

Overall

I think that the camera performance of the Poco F6 is some of the best in its price range. The images come out with nice exposure, contrast, and colors, but you’ll need to be careful around red colors. Also, you shouldn’t have to worry too much about bringing this phone out with you at night. It’s a good camera through and through.

Poco F6 Pro Review: Software

The Poco F6 Pro uses Xiaomi’s HyperOS, and this is running on top of Android 14. The software is nice with interesting animations. For example, when you unlock the phone, you’ll see the app icons fly in from outside of the screen. Also, when you summon the notification shade, you’ll see the clock smoothly grow. All of the animations are fluid, and they give the software a nice flair.

You’re able to customize certain aspects of the software like the animation speed, transitions, and app icon grid. The customizations aren’t as robust as Oxygen OS, but you still get some nice options.

By default, when you summon the recent apps screen, you’ll see the apps arranged in a grid, and you’d expect to swipe up to close them. However, that’s not the case. You need to swipe left and right to get rid of them, and that’s a bit counter-intuitive. You can change this in the home screen settings, but since it comes with this setting out of the box, I have to mention it.

20240603 180946

One gripe that many people will have is the fact that Hyper OS takes the same approach to the notification shade as HiOS/XOS. The notification shade is split into two separate panels. Swiping down from the top left will show you your notifications and swiping down from the top right will show you your quick settings. Most Android users are used to having both the notifications and quick settings in one panel. So, if this is something that would bother you, it will take some getting used to.

Overall, I feel that the software is great. I don’t have any real complaints about it.

Poco F6 Pro Review: Final verdict

Creating a Flagship Killer isn’t just about shoving the latest and greatest specs into a phone and charging $500 for it. There’s more at play. A true Flagship Killer is great at creating the illusion of using a $1,000 phone. Why are Samsung’s and Apple’s phones so great? Is it because of the specs? Maybe it’s the design? The display? Is it because of the software? No. It’s because of the marriage of all of those elements.

People flock to Galaxy phones and iPhones because Samsung and Apple pour a ton of time into creating an overall unified experience. It starts from the moment you put your hand on the phone to the moment you put it down; everything just flows together.

A Flagship Killer is able to replicate this feeling by bringing all of its elements together. A phone can sport the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 and have 24GB of RAM, but what’s the use if the phone feels cheap, the display’s bad, and the software is janky? Why have a beautiful screen if the camera is trash?

Poco F6 Pro (8)

A flagship is a whole, not the sum of its specs, and this is a lesson that the Poco brand has taught us over the years. The Poco F6 Pro brings some flagship-grade specs and a great design, but it goes much further than that. This phone brings a core experience that really makes me feel like I’m holding a phone that can go up against true flagships. Sure, it falls behind in some aspects like the camera and screen brightness, but when I pick up this phone, I don’t feel like I’m picking up a $500 device. I feel like it should be about double that price.

As such, I highly recommend this phone!

The post Poco F6 Pro Review: You've done it again, Poco! appeared first on Android Headlines.


[ad_2]
Source link

Hackers Leak 221,470 Users’ Data in “Tech in Asia” News Outlet Breach

0
[ad_1]

A data breach at Tech in Asia has exposed the personal information of 221,470 users. Learn more about the hack attributed to IntelBroker and the ongoing response to secure user data.

A database owned by Tech in Asia, a prominent technology news outlet focusing on startups and technological innovations across Asia, has been compromised. The breach was announced by a hacker known by the pseudonym “Sanggiero,” linked to the infamous hacking collective, IntelBroker.

Hackers Leak 230,000 Users' Info in Tech in Asia News Outlet Data Breach
Screenshot from the hacker’s post on Breach Forums (Credit: Hackread.com)

Tech in Asia, which has received backing from Eduardo Saverin, the co-founder of Facebook, operates from bases in Singapore and Jakarta. The platform is a critical resource for news on technological advancements and entrepreneurial ventures in the region.

Details of the breach were disclosed late last night on several dark web forums, including the infamous cybercrime and data leak forum Breach Forums. Sanggiero claimed responsibility for the hack, stating that it occurred in June 2024 and impacted over 221,470 individuals.

As seen by Hackread.com, the leaked information includes user data such as the following:

  • Roles
  • Full names
  • Display names
  • Email addresses
  • Date of registration.
Hackers Leak 230,000 Users' Data in "Tech in Asia" News Outlet Breach
Hackread.com analysed the leaked data

As confirmed by Tech in Asia to Hackread.com in an exclusive statement, these records belong to its users. However, the good news is that no passwords were leaked. According to Sanggiero, the data was accessed by exploiting several critical vulnerabilities in Tech in Asia’s API and other bugs that allowed access to the internal services of the website.

“We confirm that the Tech in Asia Indonesia site was compromised, but the main Tech in Asia site remains secure. The situation has been contained. We apologise to users affected by this incident and will contact them with safety measures. Only email addresses and names were leaked; account passwords remain secure. We are taking further measures to ensure that our users’ data remains safe.”

Tech in Asia

The motives behind the breach are obvious. Additionally, IntelBrokers has been known for targeting high-profile companies and top security agencies. Some of the group’s previous hacks include Europol, Home Depot, ICE, USCIS, HSBC and Barclays Bank.

This incident leaves a critical lesson for all companies: Cybersecurity isn’t a one-time setup but a continual process. As cyber threats become more complex and frequent, it’s vital that businesses consistently enhance security. Doing so not only protects sensitive data but also builds and maintains the trust of its users.

Follow our dedicated cybersecurity news coverage for updates on this story and more.

  1. AT&T Confirms Data Breach Affecting 73 Million Users
  2. Massive Data Breach Exposes Info of 43 Million French Workers
  3. API Misuse: Hacker Exposes 2.6M Duolingo Users’ Emails & Names
  4. American Express Cardholders Impacted by 3ed-Party Data Breach
  5. Dell Discloses Data Breach As Hacker Sells 49 Million Customer Data
  6. Ticketmaster Suffers Data Breach: 560M Users’ Info for Sale at $500K

[ad_2]
Source link

Microsoft Recall snapshots can be easily grabbed with TotalRecall tool

0
[ad_1]

Microsoft’s Recall feature has been criticized heavily by pretty much everyone since it was announced last month. Now, researchers have demonstrated the risks by creating a tool that can find, extract, and display everything Recall has stored on a device.

For those unaware, Recall is a feature within what Microsoft is calling its “Copilot+ PCs,” a reference to the AI assistant and companion which the company released in late 2023.

The idea is that Recall can assist users to reconstruct past activity by taking regular screenshots of a user’s activity and storing them, so it can answer important questions like “where did I see those expensive white sneakers?”

However, the scariest part is that Recall does not perform content moderation. It will not hide information such as passwords or financial account numbers and that data may be in snapshots that are stored on your device.

Many security professionals have pointed out that this kind of built-in spyware is a security risk. But Microsoft tried to reassure users, saying:

“Recall data is only stored locally and not accessed by Microsoft or anyone who does not have device access.”

The problem lies in that last part of the statement. Who has device access? Although Microsoft claimed that an attacker would need to gain physical access, unlock the device and sign in before they could access saved screenshots, it turns out that might not be true.

As a warning about how Recall could be abused by criminal hackers, Alex Hagenah, a cybersecurity researcher, has released a demo tool that is capable of automatically extracting and displaying everything Recall records on a laptop.

For reasons any science fiction fan will understand, Hagenah has named that tool TotalRecall.  All the information that Recall saves into its main database on a Windows laptop can be “recalled.“

As Hagenah points out:

“The database is unencrypted. It’s all plain text.”

TotalRecall can automatically find the Recall database on a person’s computer and make a copy of the file, for whatever date range you want. Pulling one day of screenshots from Recall, which stores its information in an SQLite database, took two seconds at most, according to Hagenah. Once TotalRecall has been deployed, it is possible to generate a summary about the data or search for specific terms in the database.

Now imagine an info-stealer that incorporates the capabilities of TotalRecall. This is not a far-fetched scenario because many information stealers are modular. The operators can add or leave out certain modules based on the target and the information they are after. And reportedly, the number of devices infected with data stealing malware has seen a sevenfold increase since 2023.

Another researcher, Kevin Beaumont, says he has built a website where a Recall database can be uploaded and instantly searched. He says he hasn’t released the site yet, to allow Microsoft time to potentially change the system.

According to Beaumont:

“InfoStealer trojans, which automatically steal usernames and passwords, are a major problem for well over a decade—now these can just be easily modified to support Recall.”

It’s true that any information stealer will need administrator rights to access Recall data, but attacks that gain those right have been around for years, and most information stealer malware does this already.

Hagenah also warned that in cases of employers with bring your own devices (BYOD) policies, there’s a risk of someone leaving with huge volumes of company data saved on their laptops.

It is worrying that this type of tools is already available even before the official launch of Recall. The risk of identity theft only increases when we allow our machines to “capture” every move we make and everything we look at.


We don’t just report on threats – we help safeguard your entire digital identity

Cybersecurity risks should never spread beyond a headline. Protect your—and your family’s—personal information by using identity protection.


[ad_2]
Source link

Next Week, the iPhone will get its Biggest Android Update Ever

0
[ad_1]

On Monday, Apple’s CEO Tim Cook will take the stage at WWDC to kickoff the unveiling of iOS 18, iPadOS 18, macOS 15, watchOS 11, tvOS 18 and visionOS 2. The keynote is expected to be a pre-recorded video once again, but that’s not the point; with iOS 18 (and iPadOS 18), we’re expecting a ton of new software features that have been available on Android for quite some time. And this time around, it could be the biggest Android update the iPhone has ever seen.

Starting off with the small stuff, Apple is slated to bring RCS to iOS with iOS 18. This is because of the EU and its DMA that forced USB-C onto the iPhone last year. Though, those on Android have had RCS since around 2019 – the standard first debuted all the way back in 2012 however. One of the reasons that Apple didn’t want to support RCS is because it won’t change anything for its users since iMessage exists. But it didn’t want to open iMessage to other platforms, so it had to add RCS; what a great ultimatum from the European Union.

Siri is going to become more like Google Assistant and Gemini

Siri is also slated for a nice overhaul this year with iOS 18, and it’s set to come with more natural responses. You know, like what the Google Assistant has been doing for nearly a decade. Siri has become the laughingstock of Apple’s products. There are plenty of jokes made about how bad it is. In fact, I only really use it to set timers or check the weather. Anything more complicated and Siri is useless.

Additionally, Siri is set to get more AI features, like providing auto-generated replies for emails and messages, a lot like what Gemini is already able to do. Apple is also reportedly working on smart summaries of the notifications you missed. Now, that’s something Android doesn’t have, but I would not be surprised to see that come in the very near future with an update to Gemini.

The ability to transcribe voice recordings is also coming with an updated Siri. This reminds me quite a bit of the Recorder app on the Pixel, which I absolutely love. In fact, it’s the main reason why I still carry a Pixel with me when I travel.

iphone 15 pro max AM AH 16

Apple will let you place icons….anywhere!

Even as someone who uses both platforms, I find this to be funny and a bit hard to believe. However, it is rumored that Apple will finally allow users to place their apps anywhere on their home screens with iOS 18. Stop me if you’ve heard this before, but Android had this feature since the beginning. I can’t remember a time when that wasn’t possible on Android.

But that’s not all; iOS is also set to allow users to change the color of app icons. Mark Gurman of Bloomberg is claiming that you would be able to change categories of apps to a certain color too. For example, all social apps are blue, and finance apps are green. That’s not something I’m excited about seeing, it seems more childish than actual customization, but hey, it’s an option.

A few years ago, Apple finally allowed users to no longer have every app on their home screen with the addition of the App Drawer. Something else Android had since basically the first version. It was a pretty big change, but it is still fairly locked down since you can’t control what groups apps get put into. But it’s better than it was before.

Let’s not forget about the AI!

Apple is also very heavily rumored to be bringing in a ton of new AI features across all of its software platforms. It recently made a deal with OpenAI, which will likely bring ChatGPT into the iPhone and be more than just an app you can download from the App Store. Apple was also developing its own LLM (Large Language Model) called Ajax and even open-sourced it a few months ago. So it’s not even a secret anymore. Mark Gurman, a popular and very accurate Apple leaker, has also posted Apple’s AI Strategy, which makes plenty of sense.

According to Gurman, Apple will use its own on-device LLM and a cloud-powered LLM while outsourcing a Chatbot to OpenAI (Google was also in the mix for this). He continued by saying that Apple isn’t building its own chatbot, but it does know that the market wants one. So, it’s willing to outsource that to OpenAI.

What kind of AI features are we expecting? Plenty of photo editing features using generative AI, of course, a way to transcribe recordings, and much more. Really, with AI, the possibilities for new features are endless. And with Gemini now being at a system level on Android devices, there’s plenty of competition for the iPhone.

ChatGPT on tablet

Apple is always so far behind Android

We get it: Apple has always been behind the competition in a number of areas because it wants to perfect things before it rolls them out to its users, which is cool. But some of these features are decades overdue. IOS 18 looks like it might actually be the biggest Android update ever for the iPhone. We’re excited to see what WWDC 2024 brings for the iPhone, iPad, Mac, Apple Watch, and Vision Pro, with the show kicking off on Monday at 10 AM PT/1 PM ET.


[ad_2]
Source link

Microsoft and Google ignore outcry about their controversial AI tools

0
[ad_1]

AI Overviews; Windows Recall. These are some of the biggest AI features announced by Google and Microsoft this year, and both companies have high hopes for them. Well, SOMEONE has to, as the majority of the tech world despises these tools. They both spell bad news, but the companies making them aren’t taking our complaints to heart. Instead, Google and Microsoft are ignoring the outcry about their controversial AI tools.

First up, AI Overviews

Let’s catch you up: Back during Google I/O 2024, Google introduced the public to AI Overviews. This is the tool that provides AI-generated overviews of the things you search on Google. Rather than surfacing relevant web pages, the tool will just summarize what you’re searching for.

Why is it bad?

Well, this is a tool that can greatly diminish the traffic that many websites get, thus killing their ad revenue. Without enough ad revenue, many websites and associated companies will need to shut down. News websites rely on this ad revenue to survive, but Google just doesn’t care.

What makes things worse is the fact that Google has started showing ads on the AI Overviews. That’s a huge slap to the face of the companies that split ad revenue. Whenever people travel to a site and click on an ad, both the website and Google get a cut of the ad revenue. Now, Google will be able to forgo displaying those websites and keep the ad revenue for itself.

That’s not all, but this tool has been showing some very odd and potentially dangerous answers to queries. Famously, it advised someone to put glue on pizza to help the cheese stick. Sure, that’s not the most dangerous answer, but if it’s messing up on something as simple as that, it could definitely mess up on something that’s not so obviously dangerous.

A recent report states that the AI Overviews are showing up less frequently. That’s good, at least.

Next, Windows Recall

This next tool is from Microsoft’s camp. Windows Recall is an interesting tool that will basically have the system continuously take screenshots of everything you’re doing on your computer. It will then store that data locally. So, if you need to recall something that you were doing at a certain point, you can ask Copilot to search through those screenshots.

Say, if you saved a file in a folder a few days back, and you forgot where you put it, you can ask Copilot “Where did I put [File name]”. Ostensibly, it will be able to look through the screenshots, identify the file, and tell you.

Why is it bad?

Sure, this could be a useful tool to help you recall certain actions. However, it doesn’t sit well with the community for several reasons. Firstly, not many people are hip to the thought of EVERYTHING you do on your computer being watched and documented. We can always make the joke that “Microsoft will see all the porn websites you visit [dopey laughter]”. But, in all seriousness, you’re handling sensitive documents, inputting passwords, storing banking information, communicating with clients, etc. on your computer. All of this stuff could potentially be documented.

Along with the fact that it’s creepy, there’s another issue; another MAJOR issue. As discovered by cybersecurity editor Kevin Beaumont, the feature saves everything you do on your computer as a plain text SQLite database on your computer. Users can actually locate the file on their computer just by going to the AppData folder. So, while it’s stored locally, a five-year-old can access it.

Google and Microsoft are ignoring the outcry about their controversial AI tools

It really gets us how companies can develop and ship features that they know will not sit well with the community. The executives at Google know that AI Overviews could topple the news industry; our aforementioned five-year-old can get the logic behind that. Obviously, many news organizations, who are already salty about the march of AI, have a major issue with it. However, in interviews, Google/Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai said that people will use the overviews as a jumping-off point. What’s the use of a jumping-off point if you get everything you need in an instant?

Seriously, how many people will read the overviews and think to dig deeper? Sure, there are some people who will do this, but not enough to properly sustain the ad revenue of news websites.

In the case of Microsoft, who thought that, in the age of zero privacy, introducing a feature that literally records everything you do on your computer would be a hit? The company introduced a privacy and security nightmare that stores the data behind a 1-foot tall gate. These are industry professionals here; they’re all highly trained and very intelligent. However, they pull stunts like these. People are cracking into this feature and finding major security flaws that should not be there.

The outcry is unheard

The community is unhappy with having these blatantly destructive AI tools, and all the companies can do is defend them. Despite so much public backlash, Google continues to work on AI Overviews. Fixing the odd responses doesn’t fix the core issue; the issue is that people don’t want it because it can cost a ton of people their jobs. This is why guides on how to disable AI Overviews popped up A DAY after it was launched.

Microsoft clarified that Windows Recall is opt-in only. In all honesty, that’s a good thing (with that, it’s already a step ahead of AI Overviews). It will also require Windows Hello authentication. However, that’s not the core issue. The issue is that the feature is extremely intrusive and as secure as a paper mache lock.

The tech community is tired of being ignored by large tech companies that pull this crap. They launch AI tools that are major red flags and they ignore the backlash. They just issue statements saying that they will fix the issue and hope that the people forget. However, there are things that a scripted comment from a spokesperson can’t cover up.

The community is crying out for companies to stop shipping these features and only hear silence. We’re at a point where AI could cause some major damage, and these major tech brands need to realize that, if they keep going down this path, they’re going to reach a point where they do irreparable damage.


[ad_2]
Source link

Turns out, the Spotify Car Thing is already open source, but its hardware is useless

0
[ad_1]

Image credit: Spotify

The recent news of Spotify’s plan to shut down all Car Thing devices by the end of the year has caused quite a stir. The streaming giant discontinued sales of the device a while back, but the announcement to completely deactivate functional units has drawn criticism from users who were hoping for a more sustainable solution.A tech enthusiast, Josh Hendrickson, recently shed light on an interesting detail about the Car Thing that Spotify hadn’t publicized. It turns out that the device is, in fact, open source. Hendrickson shared his findings on Twitter, revealing that the Car Thing runs on Linux and the source code for its U-boot and Linux kernel is readily available on GitHub. Additionally, the Amlogic chip used in the device allows users to run custom code and even add their own software.
So, why didn’t Spotify make this information public? Hendrickson believes it’s due to the Car Thing’s hardware limitations. With a weak Amlogic processor, limited storage, and minimal RAM, the device struggles to run anything beyond its intended purpose as a lightweight web-based music player. Although the Car Thing is technically open for modifications, its underwhelming performance makes any significant repurposing rather pointless.This new information adds another layer of disappointment to the Car Thing saga. Hendrickson even refers to the device as “open-source e-waste.” For those interested in the technical details, he plans to release a comprehensive video delving deeper into the inner workings of the Car Thing.

Looking back, it seems questionable for Spotify to have invested in creating a $100 device solely for playing music from the web. There were arguably more efficient and environmentally friendly alternatives available, such as improving integration with existing car infotainment systems or leveraging the capabilities of smartphones.

While the open-source nature of the Car Thing might have offered a glimmer of hope for repurposing, its hardware limitations ultimately render it impractical for anything beyond its original function. As Spotify moves forward, it’s hoped that the company will consider more sustainable and practical solutions for its future hardware endeavors.


[ad_2]
Source link

4 Arrested as Operation Endgame Disrupts Ransomware Botnets

0
[ad_1]

Europol led Operation Endgame, the largest operation against botnets to date, focused on dismantling the infrastructure of malicious dropper networks that enabled ransomware attacks.

In a major crackdown on cybercrime, Europol announced on Monday the successful completion of Operation Endgame, a massive international effort to disrupt and dismantle dropper networks, including IcedID, SystemBC, Smokeloader, Trickbot, Pikabot, and Bumblebee.

The three-day operation, coordinated from Europol’s headquarters, resulted in the arrest of four suspects, the execution of over 16 searches, and the takedown of over 100 servers and 2,000 domains linked to these criminal activities.

For your information, Droppers are malicious software tools designed to bypass security measures and deploy additional harmful programs, such as viruses, ransomware, or spyware, onto a target system. They are often used during the first stage of a malware attack and play a major role in the deployment of ransomware.

Operation Endgame, the largest-ever operation against botnets, targeted the infrastructure of these dropper networks, which facilitated attacks with ransomware and other malicious software.

The operation was led by France, Germany, and the Netherlands and supported by Eurojust, Denmark, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Other countries, including Armenia, Bulgaria, Lithuania, Portugal, Romania, Switzerland, and Ukraine, also supported the operation with various actions, such as arrests, searches, and seizures of servers and domains.

The operation was also supported by several private partners at national and international level, including Bitdefender, Cryptolaemus, Sekoia, Shadowserver, Team Cymru, Prodaft, Proofpoint, NFIR, Computest, Northwave, Fox-IT, HaveIBeenPwned, Spamhaus, DIVD, abuse.ch, and Zscaler.

The operation resulted in the arrest of one suspect in Armenia and three in Ukraine, as well as the execution of 16 searches in Armenia, the Netherlands, Portugal, and Ukraine. Over 100 servers were taken down or disrupted in Bulgaria, Canada, Germany, Lithuania, the Netherlands, Romania, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, the United States, and Ukraine. Additionally, over 2,000 domains under the control of law enforcement were seized.

Further investigations, as per Europol’s press release, revealed that one of the main suspects earned over €69 million ($74 million – £58 million) in cryptocurrency by renting out criminal infrastructure sites to deploy ransomware. The suspect’s transactions are being monitored, and legal permission to seize these assets has been obtained.

The operation is a major blow to the dropper industry and a step in the fight against ransomware and other forms of cybercrime. However, Europol warned that Operation Endgame does not end here and that new actions will be announced on the official website of Operation Endgame.

The success of this operation shows cyber criminals may have become sophisticated but law enforcement agencies would always be a step ahead. It also highlights the need for continuous funding and innovation in cybersecurity measures and the importance of international cooperation in addressing online criminal activity.

  1. Finnish Dark Web Marketplace PIILOPUOTI Seized
  2. FBI Disrupts Chinese State-Backed Volt Typhoon’s KV Botnet
  3. LockBit Ransomware Gang Domains Seized in Global Operation
  4. Goldoon Botnet Targeting D-Link Devices, Exploits 9-Year-Old Flaw
  5. Operator of Major Proxy Botnet ‘IPStorm’ Arrested, Pleads Guilty in US

[ad_2]
Source link

Good cameras, sleek design, average performance

0
[ad_1]

The Vivo V30 is a premium mid-range smartphone and a watered-down version of the Vivo V30 Pro we reviewed in March. The vanilla model has the same design language as the Pro, meaning you get an incredibly slim phone with curved edges that offer no grip. The device still feels fairly premium thanks to a well-built body and a glass back. However, it is significantly different from the Pro internally. Most notably, the Vivo V30 comes with only two 50MP rear cameras in some regions. Vivo offers a third 2MP camera in select markets but our review unit lacks it.

This device also lacks a ZEISS partnership for enhanced image quality. Additionally, it features a less powerful processor and an older storage standard (UFS 2.2 instead of UFS 3.1). On the brighter side, it retains a 1.5K display, up to 12GB of RAM and 512GB storage, and a 5,000mAh battery with 80W charging. The overall package looks solid for the money you pay. But it is ultimately the everyday performance that matters the most. In this review, we evaluate how the Vivo V30 holds up during moderate and heavy usage.

Vivo V30 AH SA 19

Table of contents

Vivo V30 Pro Review: Hardware & Design

The Vivo V30 is an incredibly slim phone, measuring just 7.45mm in thickness. It is Vivo’s slimmest phone with a 5,000mAh battery, alongside the Pro. The vanilla model is 2 grams lighter too, weighing in at 186 grams. The device is 164.4mm tall and 75.1mm wide, making it comfortable to hold and use with one hand. Its dual-curved design with glass on the front and back makes it a bit slippery but the bundles transparent cover adds the required grip without concealing its design much.

The phone has a plastic frame with a glossy finish that perfectly complements the shiny rear glass. Vivo says the frame has reinforced corners with a cushioning structure for better shock absorption. The Vivo V30 has its frame slightly recessed on the top and bottom. Like the Pro, it has “PROFESSIONAL PORTRAIT” inscribed on the top. This is despite the phone lacking a dedicated portrait camera. There are no stereo speakers here, so you get a single bottom-firing speaker alongside the SIM tray, USB Type-C port, and a microphone.

Brilliant colors, clicky buttons

Vivo offers the V30 in four colors, each with a unique finish that adds to its aesthetics. We have the Waving Aqua variant with a Rippling Magnetic Particle effect. The Bloom White version has a 3D Petal Pattern, the Lush Green has a color-changing rear panel, and the Noble Black has Fluorite AG Glass. The company gets full marks for the color scheme. The vertical rectangular camera bump is also designed nicely. It is divided into two rounded squares. The top one houses the two 50MP cameras, while the bottom has the Aura Light ring and an LED flash.

Like other Vivo phones, the V30 has power and volume buttons on the right side. Both buttons are at a comfortable height and fairly clicky. The curved nature of the phone, which doesn’t leave much space for a wide frame, makes the buttons a little sharp, but nothing uncomfortable. Going back to the front, the earpiece is hidden nicely under the frame, while the punch-hole cutout for the selfie camera is also small. I would have preferred the under-display fingerprint scanner at a slightly higher position, but it doesn’t take long to get used to it.

Vivo V30 Pro Review: Display

The Vivo V30 has a 6.78-inch AMOLED display of 1,260 x 2,800 pixels (1.5K resolution) or 453ppi pixel density. The company has slapped a curved Schott Alpha glass protective panel on the screen. It is a high-end display with a 120Hz refresh rate, 300Hz touch sampling rate, 10-bit color depth, and an 8,000,000:1 contrast ratio. Vivo says the screen can reach a local peak brightness of a whopping 2,800 nits. That is the maximum it can go when viewing certain HDR content.

In everyday usage, the Vivo V30 Pro can achieve a peak brightness of 1,200 nits. That is more than enough for a comfortable viewing even in the brightest environment. In our testing, we reached a maximum brightness of 870 nits by manually sliding the controller. In automatic mode, the brightness went up to 1,191 nits when a bright beam of light was directed onto the sensor. Overall, the Vivo V30’s display gets adequately bright depending on the surroundings, with the screen getting even brighter when displaying HDR content.

At night, when you need the display to dim, the phone benefits from 2160Hz PWM (pulse-width modulation) dimming. We recorded a minimum brightness of just 2 nits. The screen colors appear decent even at low brightness. The Vivo V30 also boasts hardware-level low blue light certification and anti-fatigue technology to make for a comfortable viewing experience at night. The screen is one of the strengths of this phone, and there are more reasons for it.

Highly-customizable screen colors

The screen colors on the Vivo V30 are amazing. You get vibrant colors with excellent color depth, saturation, and contrast ratio. And if you do not like the default color scheme, you can customize it to your liking. Vivo offers three color presets—Standard, Professional, and Bright. You can select between those and manually adjust the color temperature to get the desired colors on the screen.

Excellent colors coupled with Widevine L1 DRM support make the Vivo V30 a great phone for media consumption. You can stream content in Full HD across all popular platforms, including Netflix and Amazon Prime Video. The phone also has HDR10 support for an enhanced viewing experience. If you aren’t using earphones, you might rue the lack of stereo speakers as a single speaker doesn’t quite give you an immersive experience. That said, it is fairly loud (more on the speaker quality later).

Vivo V30 Pro Review: Performance

The Vivo V30 is powered by Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 chipset. It is a 4nm SoC manufactured by TSMC and released in early 2024. It boasts an octa-core CPU with one Cortex-A715 prime core clocked at 2.63GHz, three more at 2.4GHz, and four Cortex-A510 efficiency cores at 1.8GHz. The setup includes an Adreno 720 GPU and supports LPDDR5 RAM. Vivo has paired the setup with 8GB/12GB RAM and 128GB/256GB/512GB UFS 2.2 storage.

The company sent us the 12GB+512GB variant, the beefiest of the lot. In everyday usage, the phone delivered reliable performance with no noticeable hiccups. It handled background apps efficiently, and switching between apps was fairly smooth. The Vivo V30 also did well in graphic intense games at moderate graphics settings. Pushing it to the highest graphics caused some stutters that we expected from it, though the phone didn’t get too warm. You can find more about its performance and thermals below.

Benchmarks

We run several benchmark apps on smartphones we review. We treated the Vivo V30 similarly. The run began with a Geekbench test. Since the Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 is a mid-range chipset, we didn’t expect miracles and we were right. The phone scored 1,137 in the single-core CPU test on Geekbench v6 and 3,184 in the multi-core test. It achieved a score of 3,557 in the GPU test. Here’s how these scores compare against some other phones.

Vivo V30 Geekbench

Next up, we ran the 3D Mark Wildlife Extreme Stress Test on the Vivo V30. It is an intense, 20-minute test designed to simulate prolonged heavy use. It pushes the device to its limits to determine how it holds up. The scores we got were within the expected range. Its best loop score was 1,489, while the lowest loop score was 1,236. The phone delivered a decent performance stability of 83%.

We also run a Capcut test on devices that arrive on our desks. This is a test we have put together here at Android Headlines and is aimed at determining its performance speed. We use Capcut to export a 1-minute video (the same video on every phone) and note the time a device takes to complete the job. The Vivo V30 took about 26 seconds to complete the export. You can compare its performance with other phones in the graph below.

Vivo V30 Capcut

The phone is surprisingly good at handling thermals

Thermal performance is critical to determining how good a phone is. It is not ideal if the phone delivers excellent performance but heats up too much. Hence we run thermal tests on devices we review to give you an insight into its cooling system. Firstly, we checked the device’s body temperature immediately after the 20-minute-long 3D Mark Wildlife Extreme Stress Test, which we ran with the screen brightness at maximum.

On the screen side, the Vivo V30 reached a maximum temperature of 113.9 degrees Fahrenheit/ 45.5 degrees Celcius. Our heat gun recorded the highest temperature of 111.1 degrees Fahrenheit/ 43.9 degrees Celcius on its back side. These figures are notably less than the Pro model, which reached a temperature of 123.6 degrees Fahrenheit after the 3D Mark Wildlife Extreme Stress Test. Its non-Pro sibling is surprisingly good at handling thermals.

Interestingly, Vivo says both phones have the same cooling system. It claims a total cooling area of 35,141 mm², an ultra-large vapor chamber measuring 3,002 mm², and 11 temperature sensors to keep the system temperature in check. That doesn’t seem to be helping the Pro model much. Perhaps its aging processor is the main culprit. The Vivo V30 has a newer chip and it is good at thermals. The phone also cooled down fairly quickly.

The Vivo V30 also did a better job at handling thermals during camera usage. After 5 minutes of 4K video recording at 30fps (the device doesn’t support 4K videos at 60fps), its body temperature measured a maximum of 104.1 degrees Fahrenheit/ 40.05 degrees Celcius. It reached 106.7 degrees Fahrenheit/41.5 degrees Celcius after 10 minutes. The device’s maximum temperature after playing Genshin Impact in high graphics settings for 30 minutes was 104.5 degrees Fahrenheit/ 40.3 degrees Celcius.

Vivo V30 Pro Review: Audio

The Vivo V30 has a single speaker at the bottom. Many competing phones offer dual-stereo speakers, so this is one of its weaknesses. However, the single bottom-firing speaker is quite loud, particularly when you enter Audio Booster mode. It’s automatically enabled when you press the volume up button after reaching 100% volume level. Pushing the volume to the highest level doesn’t affect the audio quality, which is great.

Like on other phones, we tested the Vivo V30’s speaker output quality across five different parameters. We used the same five audio tracks to test the phone’s loudness and distortion, bass, treble, vocals, and overall balance. It did well overall, though we found it a bit lacking in bass. Of course, everyone has their preference when it comes to audio settings, but this phone shouldn’t disappoint with its audio quality. If anything, the lack of stereo speakers makes content consumption not as immersive as you’d like.

Vivo V30 Pro Review: Battery life & Charging

Like its Pro sibling, the Vivo V30 packs a 5,000mAh battery. More importantly, it turned out to be more efficient than we expected. The device could comfortably run us through the day even with relatively heavy usage involving some gaming sessions, photography, video streaming, and video calling. In our three weeks of using the phone as a daily driver, we never had to charge it twice a day. We charged it in the morning, used it throughout the day, and were still left with a decent amount of battery every single day.

To give you a better insight into the Vivo V30’s battery endurance, we ran a YouTube test on it. We charged the device to 100% and played a YouTube video in 1080p resolution with 100% sound and maximum manual brightness till it ran out of battery. The device lasted 19 hours and 45 minutes before the battery dropped to 0. That’s the best we have achieved on any mid-range phone. To recall, the Vivo V30 Pro lasted for 18 hours and 5 minutes.

Vivo V30 Charging Test

Impressive charging speed

The Vivo V30 not only lasts long on a single charge but replenishes itself fairly quickly when you run out of battery. The phone supports 80W wired charging with the company including a charger in the box. Starting at 0, it reached 13% charge in just five minutes. By 10 minutes, we had a 26% charge, which reached 38% in 15 minutes. A 50% charge took about 20 minutes, while we achieved a 73% charge in 30 minutes. It took another 13 minutes (43 minutes in total) to reach 100%, though a “Fully Charged” notification only showed up after 47 minutes of charging.

Vivo V30 Battery Life

Vivo V30 Pro Review: Camera

Vivo has always focused its V series on camera and photography. The V30 Pro featured four excellent 50MP cameras. Its non-pro sibling lacks the dedicated portrait shooter (2x optical zoom lens) and the ZEISS partnership but it is no slouch when it comes to the camera performance. The main camera has a 1/1.55-inch optical format size with an f/1.9 aperture, 23mm focal length, and 1.0µm pixels. It boasts PDAF (phase-detection autofocus) and OIS (Optical Image Stabilization).

Vivo V30 AH SA 15

In daylight conditions, it gives you brilliant photos with a great amount of detail, dynamic range, and vibrancy. We occasionally ran into exposure issues, particularly in scenes with shadows. However, the Vivo V30 captures satisfactory photos if there is enough light. In indoor conditions with less light, some images may contain noise in darker areas. The colors are still fine though. The stock camera app lets you switch between three preset color modes—Vibrant, Natural, and Textured.

Zoomed-in photos aren’t as amazing as expected

The Vivo V30 is a mid-range smartphone and expectedly lacks a dedicated zoom camera. However, we have seen companies use powerful software algorithms to produce almost lossless 2x zoom photos using the main camera. Sadly, we can’t say the same for this phone. While 2x photos are nice overall, they lack fine details. They get worse in darker environments. Vivo seems to be softening the images the make them look good on the small screen.

2x zoom samples:

Beyond 2x, the quality of zoom photos deteriorates fast. The amount of noise is too high in dark patches. Some photos up to 4x or 5x zoom come out decent enough for uploading to social media but nothing special. Considering how Vivo has focused the V30 on photography, it should have worked on improving its zoom algorithm. Maybe software updates can improve the quality of zoomed-in photos.

5x zoom samples:

A better ultrawide camera than the competition

The Vivo V30’s 50MP ultrawide camera has a 15mm focal length, an f/2.0 aperture, and 0.64µm pixels. It boasts autofocus but no PDAF or OIS. However, the images we get from the ultrawide camera are commendable. They contain plenty of detail, sharpness, and vibrancy, all with excellent color accuracy and dynamic range. Since most competing phones have a lower-resolution ultrawide camera, this Vivo phone impresses with its ultrawide image quality.

An excellent selfie camera

The Vivo V30 also impressed us with its selfie camera. The phone has a 50MP unit with an f/2.0 aperture, 20mm focal length, and 0.64µm pixels. The image quality is comparable to the main rear camera. Selfies capture skin tones well while giving you excellent details and sharpness. Of course, you can always soften the skin tone using various built-in camera tools. But if you like the natural look of your face, this phone doesn’t disappoint.

Vivo V30 Pro Review: Software

Vivo ships this phone with Android 14-based Funtouch OS 14. Funtouch OS has always been one of the most heavily customized, and highly customizable, Android skins. It lets you customize almost every aspect of the UI, from wallpapers and lock screen to AOD (Always-on Display), fonts, animations, and more. You get several built-in styles and customization options for various UI elements.

As far as software features are concerned, Vivo offers a sidebar where you can keep your most frequent apps for quick access from anywhere. The sidebar can be pulled on top of any app, letting you enter a new app without going back or entering the Recents menu. Speaking of which, the Recents screen can be customized at the tap of a button. You can quickly switch between a single and a two-row tile layout with live preview.

For gamers, the built-in Ultra Game Mode lets you enhance your gaming experience with extra controls over calls,  notifications, and more. The Quick Settings panel has a standard experience with two large pills followed by smaller circular buttons. It can be customized fairly easily. We would have liked it better if Vivo moved the Settings shortcut above the Quick Panel. You have to pull down the full panel to get the shortcut, which is a little inconvenient.

The overall software experience on the Vivo V30 is smooth. Funtouch OS is known for its customizability and the latest version doesn’t disappoint. You can even customize system sounds, which can be helpful for people with hearing problems or older people with impaired hearing. If anything, Vivo’s poor update support is a big disappointment.

Poor software update support from Vivo

Vivo’s software update support for its V series phones has always been poor. Despite many competing brands improving their support, Vivo stays adamant. The V30 series, including the Pro model, is only eligible for two major Android OS updates, i.e., you will get updates up to Android 16. Security patches are promised for three years, so those will come until sometime in 2027. We expected better from Vivo— at least three Android OS updates and four years of security patches—but it disappointed us again.

Vivo V30 Pro Review: Should you buy it?

Vivo made the V30 for people who want excellent cameras without breaking the bank. We found its zoom algorithm somewhat lacking but the main cameras produce amazing regular photos. The Vivo V30 doesn’t disappoint much in everyday usage, thanks to a large curved display, a big battery with fast charging, and highly customizable software. But if cameras aren’t your primary need, you might find some great alternatives. After all, the mid-range Android market is full of amazing phones.

Vivo V30 AH SA 13

You should buy the Vivo V30 if you:

…want amazing cameras
…like a dual-curved design
…want an excellent display
…want great battery life

You should not buy the Vivo V30 if you:

…want stereo speakers
…prefer strong protection against dust and water
…want an excellent gaming mid-range phone


[ad_2]
Source link

Sticky Werewolf Weaponizing LNK Files Group Attacking To Attack Organizations

0
[ad_1]

Sticky Werewolf, a cyber threat group, has shifted its targeting strategy from sending phishing emails with download links to malicious files to using archive attachments containing LNK files, which act as shortcuts to malicious executables hosted on WebDAV servers. 

When a user clicks on the LNK, a batch script is triggered, which in turn launches an AutoIt script designed to deliver the final payload, which bypasses traditional phishing tactics and injects malware directly if the user executes the LNK file. 

Infection Chain

A cyberespionage group, Sticky Werewolf, is targeting the aviation industry with phishing emails disguised as business invitations from a legitimate Russian aerospace company, AO OKB Kristall, where the emails contain an archive attachment with two malicious LNK files masquerading as DOCX documents and a decoy PDF file.

With ANYRUN You can Analyze any URL, Files & Email for Malicious Activity : Start your Analysis

Clicking the LNK files triggers a Batch script that launches an AutoIt script to ultimately deliver the final payload, which is a significant shift from Sticky Werewolf’s previous tactics of using links to download malware directly from file-sharing platforms. 

Phishing Email

A phishing email with a decoy PDF attachment targets enterprises related to Russian helicopters, as the PDF mentions a video conference and references two malicious LNK files disguised as meeting documents. 

Clicking the LNK files triggers an NSIS self-extracting archive, a variant of the CypherIT crypter, to download and run a malicious executable from a network share.

The extracted files land in the Internet Explorer temporary files directory, and then a batch script is executed. 

Pdf

Two malicious LNK files, disguised as Word documents, target users, and clicking either LNK triggers a sequence of events, as first, the LNK adds a registry entry to run a compromised WINWORD.exe on login persistently. 

Then, it displays a decoy error message to distract the user. The first LNK copies a potentially deceptive image file, while the second LNK behaves similarly, launching a malicious WINWORD.exe. 

Batch Script

A batch script within the LNK delays execution if specific antivirus processes are running and potentially renames files to evade detection.

Finally, the script combines a legitimate AutoIt executable with a malicious script and executes them. 

Processes monitored by the Batch script and their corresponding security vendors. 

This malicious AutoIT script aims to evade detection, establish persistence, and check for signatures of security environments and debuggers. It injects a clean copy of ntdll.dll to bypass hooking, effectively unhooking any monitoring attempts. 

Persistence is achieved through scheduled tasks or startup directory modifications, where the payload, hidden within the script, is decrypted using a two-stage RC4 process with a user-defined passphrase. 

According to Morphisec, the decrypted and decompressed payload is injected via process hollowing into a legitimate AutoIT process, making it harder to detect.

Looking for Full Data Breach Protection? Try Cynet's All-in-One Cybersecurity Platform for MSPs: Try Free Demo 


[ad_2]
Source link