Evolution of Cybercrime Investigations

0
[ad_1]

Cybercrime costs trillions, rising yearly. Criminals operate globally, teaching their methods. This article explores major cyberattacks from 1962 to 2024 and how investigators use advanced technology to combat them.

Cybercrime is a multi-trillion dollar business with the global annual cost of cybercrime predicted to reach USD 9.5 trillion in 2024 and USD 10.5 trillion by 2025.

With crime masquerading as legitimate organizations in all corners of the globe, some especially bold online criminals teach others to do the same, even offering their services as pop-up ads. 

Along with the explosion of cybercrime, are advancements in cybercrime investigation techniques, like those employed by Digital Forensics offering cyber security services

A Short History of Cybercrime

France claims the first cyber crime, all the way back in 1834 when hackers got into the French telegraph system and stole financial market information. However, it really took off during the 20th century and continues to grow and evolve as the internet and our online lives change and thrive. 

As of 2020, billions of dollars have been lost due to cybercrime. As technology continues to evolve, so does the sophistication of cybercrime techniques. In response, investigation measures must also evolve to keep pace. Keep reading to find out about how investigators are doing their best to control crime online.

Here is a historical look into some of the most prominent cyber attacks:

1962 – The MIT database was hacked.

1971 – the first computer virus was created

1981 – Ian Murphy was the first person convicted of a cybercrime

1988 – Robert Morris carried out the first major cyberattack.

1989 – the appearance of Ransomware

1994 – a password sniffer was used for the first time.

1995 – the first hacker tried to rob a bank.

1998 – the U.S. government was hacked for the first time. 

1999 – the Melissa virus struck.

2000 – DDoS attacks took down several major retailers

2000 – the ILOVEYOU virus attacked

2005 – HSBC experienced a security breach, affecting 180,000 customers

2008 – The data of 134 million users was compromised when Heartland Payment systems were hacked

2010 – the first digital weapon Stuxnet worm attacked nuclear plants in Iran.

2010 – the Zeus virus struck.

2010 – Operation Aurora was launched by the Chinese.

2011 – the Sony Corporation was hacked

2013 – Edward Snowden released sensitive government information from several countries

2013 – Target Corporation was the victim of a phishing attack.

2013 – Adobe users’ credit card information was released online due to being hacked

2014 – Celebgate occurs

2015 – SamSam ransomware appeared

2015 – Ashley Madison database hacked and released

2017 – WannaCry affected more than 200,000 Windows devices.

2017 – Facebook and Google employees were tricked into wiring hundreds of millions of dollars to hackers

2018 – GitHub saw traffic of 1.3 terabytes per second in a DDoS attack.

2018 – Coinhive crypto-jacking attack.

2018 – Marriot Hotels suffered a breach affecting personal data of 500 million guests

2019 – Capital One suffered the largest data breach in history

2020 – High profile X (Twitter) user accounts included in phishing attack.

2022 – The Government of Costa Rica called a state of emergency after attack by the Conti Ransomware Gang.

2023 – The ongoing MOVEit cyber attack has affected 2000+ organizations and exposed the data of 60 million people.

2024: Ticketmaster suffers data breach via Snowflake vulnerability.

2024 – Hackers steal call logs and text messages belonging to all AT&T customers.

Advanced Cybercrime Investigation Technology

As cybercrime evolves, so too does the practice of counteracting and investigating it. That includes a wide range of crimes, from online blackmail to online sextortion to data theft and much more. With a number of techniques available, there are multiple ways to address the issue.

Memory Forensics

This method involves analyzing RAM to find details like open network connections, running processes, and encryption keys. This allows for an in-depth investigation of cyber crimes while also offering a view of what a system looks like in real time during a cyber attack. 

Blockchain Forensics

Criminals use this to commit crimes dealing with cryptocurrency with the response being blockchain technology that traces online transactions so they can be analyzed for malicious activity. Tracking the flow of funds is useful for investigating crimes taking place on the dark web, as well as those that involve ransomware.

Cloud Forensics

Cloud forensics emerged as a way to investigate and track data that is stored in the cloud. Experts can collect, analyze, and preserve relevant evidence when they are investigating online crime scenes. 

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

Both Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) can be used to go through the infinite amounts of data that can be found online. This is especially helpful for analyzing data as it relates to cybercrime investigations. They can detect anomalies, recognize patterns, and flag potential threats, freeing investigators up for tasks that must be completed by humans. 

Threat Intelligence

Integrating threat intelligence techniques into cybercrime investigation is useful for identifying and responding to threats. By being aware of threats as they evolve, as well as attack patterns, experts can shore up their defences and reduce the risk of a cyberattack. 

Summary

The same tools used to combat cybercrime are also being used by cybercriminals. For that reason, continued work on improving investigative techniques, as well as staying aware of cybercrime activity offers protection, though nothing is fail-safe, so being cautious online is always important. 

  1. 6 of the Best Crypto Bug Bounty Programs
  2. Key Features Of Threat Intelligence Platforms
  3. Top 7 Most Popular and Best Cyber Forensics Tools
  4. We Need Smarter Smart Contracts To Prevent DeFi Hacks
  5. Ethical Hackers Reported 835 Flaws, Earned $450k in 2023
  6. When ethical hackers saved companies from devastating hacks
  7. Incorporating machine learning in data mapping for improved results

[ad_2]
Source link

Disney’s Internal Slack Breached? NullBulge Leaks 1.1 TiB of Data

0
[ad_1]

Hacktivist group NullBulge claims to have breached Disney, leaking 1.1 TiB of internal Slack data. The leak allegedly includes messages, files, code, and more. This comes amidst breaches affecting AT&T and Ticketmaster.

A self-proclaimed hacktivist group named NullBulge, aiming to “protect artists’ rights and ensure fair compensation for their work,” claims to have breached Disney and leaked 1.1 TiB (1.2 TB) of the company’s internal Slack infrastructure. These claims were posted on the notorious cybercrime and hacker platform Breach Forums on July 12, 2024.

The breach, which is yet to be verified, allegedly contains a complete copy of the company’s Slack communications used by their development team including messages, files, and other data exchanged within the Slack workspace.

The hackers further claim the dump includes “almost 10,000 channels, every message and file possible, unreleased projects, raw images, code, logins, links to internal API/web pages, and more!”

Disney's Internal Slack Hacked? NullBulge Leaks 1.1 TiB of Data
NullBulge on Breach Forums (Screenshot: Hackread.com)

NullBulge also used X (formerly Twitter) to announce the alleged hack, stating, “Disney has had their entire dev Slack dumped. 1.1 TiB of files and chat messages. Anything we could get our hands on, we downloaded and packaged up. Want to see what goes on behind the doors? Go grab it.”

NullBulge Group: Who, Why, and How

The origins of the NullBulge Group are unknown. However, their official website claims the group aims to protect artists’ rights and ensure fair compensation for their work. Rumours suggest that NullBulge might be linked to the LockBit ransomware gang, as they appear to be using LockBit’s leaked builder.

Disney's Internal Slack Hacked? NullBulge Leaks 1.1 TiB of Data
NullBulge on Twitter (Screenshot: Hackread.com)

As for Disney, in recent years, the company has faced criticism and legal issues regarding the payment of fair shares to artists and writers. Prominent figures like Neil Gaiman have highlighted that Disney has stopped paying royalties to some writers and artists for works that include novelizations and graphic novels of Disney-owned properties. This issue affected various creators who worked on popular franchises such as “Star Wars” and “Alien.

The problem came into the spotlight when author Alan Dean Foster publicly stated that he had not received royalties for his “Star Wars” and “Alien” novels after Disney acquired the respective franchises.

Despite some high-profile settlements, many writers and artists continue to struggle to get their due payments. Organizations like the Science Fiction & Fantasy Writers of America (SFWA) have been actively campaigning for these creators, forming task forces to pressure Disney into fulfilling its financial obligations​.

Hackread.com has reached out to Disney for comment. Meanwhile, VX-Underground, an online malware repository, tweeted that if proven legitimate, the hack could be the work of infostealer malware.

Nevertheless, the alleged data breach is just another in a series affecting companies based in the United States. On July 12, 2024, AT&T announced that hackers had stolen call records and text message logs of “nearly all” customers, impacting over 110 million Americans.

Meanwhile, the Ticketmaster data breach continues to cause headaches for Live Nation as hackers leaked 10 million ticketing barcodes related to top celebrities’ concerts. The hackers are demanding an $8 million ransom to stop future leaks.

  1. Disney+ accounts being sold on dark web marketplaces
  2. Security and Entertainment Essentials Amid Rising Digital Risks
  3. LEGO Market BrickLink Hacked; Site Down Amid Unusual Activity
  4. Nickelodeon Data Leak Labeled ‘Old’: Interview with @GhostyTongue
  5. Soap2day Shuts Down Permanently – Free Legal and Paid Alternatives

[ad_2]
Source link

Wear OS 5 may get Bluetooth LE Audio for improved battery life

0
[ad_1]

Recent findings suggest that Wear OS 5 devices could get Bluetooth LE Audio support. This means you could use the standard to stream audio from your smartwatch to your wireless headphones with lower battery consumption. This would be especially useful when using music streaming services from smartwatches while training. Multiple earbud models, like the latest Galaxy Buds 3 series, support Bluetooth LE Audio.

Bluetooth LE Audio support may arrive for Wear OS 5 in upcoming updates

Wear OS device users can enjoy music while training in two ways. They can use a streaming app, like Spotify, or they can store music in the smartwatch’s local storage. To do this, they can connect Bluetooth headphones to their watch instead of their phone. However, listening to music while training significantly increases power consumption, especially when using mobile networks with streaming apps.

That said, it is possible that Wear OS will receive an improvement that will especially benefit your watch’s battery life in that situation. As spotted by Mishaal Rahman from Android Authority, Google would integrate Bluetooth LE Audio support in the upcoming Wear OS 5 update. The source found references to an “LE Audio” option in the Bluetooth settings of the Wear OS 5 developer preview released in May. If implemented, users could switch to Bluetooth LE Audio to save battery life while enjoying music from their watches.

What is Bluetooth LE Audio?

Bluetooth LE (Bluetooth Low Energy) was designed for devices with small batteries. At first, the standard could not stream audio. Later, the organization behind the Bluetooth standard developed Bluetooth LE Audio. The latter basically enabled wireless audio transmission with lower power consumption. Bluetooth LE Audio is compatible with Android phones since version 13. However, Wear OS does not yet support it, since it is a version designed for wearables. Currently, no smartwatches (including the Apple Watch series) support Bluetooth LE Audio.

If Wear OS 5 actually gains Bluetooth LE Audio support, it will be the first OS for watches to do so. The next Wear OS update will have Android 14 in its core, so it’s possible that has something to do with it. It’s noteworthy that Bluetooth LE Audio technology is based on Bluetooth 5.2, so theoretically, any device compatible with Bluetooth 5.2 should support LE Audio as well.

Still, the source adds that smartwatch manufacturers could face some problems implementing LE Audio support retroactively. For example, obtaining the necessary firmware support from the Bluetooth chip vendor. The necessary prior tests and certifications would be another inconvenience to overcome.

Google Pixel Watch 3 is coming soon

During the upcoming Made by Google event, the company will launch the Pixel Watch 3. So far, the leaks have not mentioned anything about Bluetooth LE Audio support on the device. Now, given this development, it is possible that it is the first in its class to boast said feature, although this is pure speculation.


[ad_2]
Source link

Rabbit R1’s new update addresses issues concerning logged user chats

0
[ad_1]

Makers of the Rabbit R1 have been dealing with several problems with the AI assistant device since its launch at CES 2024. The news surrounding the product hasn’t been the best. There have been reports of poor functionality and pending features, apart from some concerns about the user data.

Now, it has been revealed that the Rabbit R1 has been logging user chats on-device since the launch. The logged chats could potentially risk a user’s personal information on lost, stolen, or second-hand R1 devices. However, the company has acknowledged the security issue and has rolled out a new software update for the R1.

Rabbit R1 users can now delete logged chats using the newly provided Factory Reset option

According to Rabbit, the R1 devices have been logging chats directly to the internal storage since launch. So, if a user sold their R1 after using it, or it was stolen or lost, the new user could potentially gain access to the personal log files. Someone could perform a “jailbreak” of the R1 to retrieve the stored log files containing important information.

After the new update, the Rabbit R1’s setting menu is updated with a new “Factory Reset” option. Rabbit advises the R1 users to use this option to delete all data before transferring ownership of the device. That said, ideally this option should’ve been there since the launch. Earlier, the users were only allowed to unlink their account from an R1, which didn’t delete any previously stored local data.

Rabbit has also reduced the amount of data that gets stored on the R1

Furthermore, the latest update for the R1 also reduces the amount of log data that gets stored on the device. After the upgrade, the pairing data is no longer logged to the device. Besides, the pairing info can no longer be utilized to read from the rabbithole. It can now only trigger actions on the device.

The latest software update for the Rabbit R1 is being rolled out over-the-air. It will be automatically downloaded and installed onto your device. Rabbit said that it is “performing a full review of device logging practices” to prevent any data security issues in the future.


[ad_2]
Source link

Get these Bose earbuds for $110 off for Prime Day

0
[ad_1]

Prime Day is only a few days away, but some companies just can’t wait to get their deals in. Bose is one of the top audio brands on the market, and it has a pair of TWS earbuds. The Bose QuietComfort II are now over $100 off for Prime Day.

If you’re looking to up your Bluetooth audio game, then you’ll want to look into getting a pair of these earbuds. There’s a ton of competition in the TWS earbud segment, but Bose is a premium audio company, so it brought its expertise over to its second pair of QuietComfort earbuds. So, you know that you’re getting some top-of-the-line audio quality.

These earbuds come with a set of high-quality drivers designed to give you amazingly detailed audio. They’re some of the best on the market. These drivers promise a deep and immersive sound, which is what you should expect from a pair of Bose TWS earbuds.

These aren’t called QuietCOMFORT for nothing. These earbuds are designed to fit comfortably in your ear for long stretches of time. That’s important for any pair of earbuds. Why wear earbuds that you don’t want to wear? They come with a Fit Kit. This kit includes three pairs of ear tips that you can choose from. This will ensure that you find the right size for your ear.

The audio quality and comfort will keep these earbuds in your ears for a while, so they come with great battery life. The buds will give you up to six hours of battery life on a single charge. That’s some good mileage, and the charging case will extend that so that you can expect a full day’s worth of battery. These are some of the best earbuds you can get, and the discount only sweetens the deal.


[ad_2]
Source link

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5

0
[ad_1]

Samsung has recently announced its new flagship foldable, the Galaxy Z Fold 6, along with a bunch of other devices. That phone is actually quite similar to its predecessor, even though there are differences, of course. In this article, we’ll compare the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5. Do note that we have kicked off the Galaxy Z Fold 6 review process, but it will take time. So we are basing this comparison on details provided by the company and our initial impressions. For more information, the review is coming.

With that being said, as per usual, we’ll first list the specifications of these two phones. Following that, we will compare the devices across a number of categories. We’ll be comparing their designs, displays, performance, battery life, cameras, and audio output. Let’s get to it, shall we?

Specs

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 & Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5,, respectively

Screen size (main):
7.6-inch Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X display (120Hz, HDR10+, 2,600 nits)
7.6-inch Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X display (120Hz, HDR10+, 1,750 nits)
Screen Size (cover):
6.3-inch Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X (120Hz, 1,600 nits)
6.2-inch Dynamic AMOLED 2X (120Hz, 1,750 nits)
Display resolution (main):
1856 x 2160
1812 x 2176
Display resolution (cover):
2376 x 968
2316 x 904
SoC:
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy
RAM:
12GB (LPDDR5X)
12GB (LPDDR5)
Storage:
256GB/512GB/1TB (UFS 4.0)
Rear cameras:
50MP (wide, f/1.8 aperture, Dual Pixel PDAF OIS), 12MP (ultrawide, 123-degree FoV), 10MP (telephoto, 3x optical zoom)
Front cameras:
4MP (under display, main display, f/1.8 aperture), 10MP (cover display, f/2.2 aperture)
Battery:
4,400mAh
Charging:
25W wired, 15W wireless, 4.5W reverse wireless (no charger)
Dimensions (unfolded):
153.5 x 132.6 x 5.6 mm
154.9 x 129.9 x 6.1mm
Dimensions (folded):
153.5 x 68.1 x 12.1 mm
154.9 x 67.1 x 13.4mm
Weight:
239 grams
253 grams
Connectivity:
5G, LTE, NFC, Wi-Fi, USB Type-C, Bluetooth 5.3
Security:
Side-facing fingerprint scanner
OS:
Android 14 with One UI 6.1.1
Android 13 with One UI
Price:
$1,899+
$1,799+
Buy:
Galaxy Z Fold 6 (Samsung / Best Buy)
Galaxy Z Fold 5 (Samsung)

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5: Design

When it comes to the design, the two phones are quite similar. The Galaxy Z Fold 6 comes with sharper corners, though the general design language remains the same. They both have a flat frame all around. The Galaxy Z Fold 6 is wider, though, while being ever so slightly shorter. It is also thinner and considerably lighter. The phone weighs 239 grams compared to 253 grams of the Galaxy Z Fold 5.

Both handsets have an under-display camera on the main panel and a display camera hole on the cover panel. The Galaxy Z Fold 6 is finally wider, and that makes typing on the cover display a bit easier. It’s still not as wide as some of its competitors, and it’s narrower than regular handsets when folded. Samsung used (Armor) aluminum for the frames of both devices, while you’ll find glass on their backs.

It is worth noting that the Galaxy Z Fold 6 has a stiffer hinge than its predecessor. That’s a good thing, as it’s more satisfying to use, and using the phone in a half-folded state (various angles) is easier now. The Galaxy Z Fold 6 has IP48 certification for water resistance, while the Galaxy Z Fold 5 offers an IPX8 rating for water resistance. The in-hand feel is slightly different, but not all that much. Both smartphones have three vertically aligned cameras on the back, in the top-left corner. Those cameras are a part of one camera island, and even though the ones on the Galaxy Z Fold 6 may seem larger, the same camera hardware is used.

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5: Display

The Galaxy Z Fold 6 includes a 7.6-inch 1856 x 2160 foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X panel. That display offers up to 120Hz refresh rate, and HDR10+ content is supported. The peak brightness here is 2,600 nits. This display has a 91% screen-to-body ratio and a 374 ppi. The cover display, on the other hand, is a 6.3-inch unit with a 2376 x 968 resolution. That is a Dynamic AMOLED 2X panel with a refresh rate of up to 120Hz. The peak brightness here is 1,600 nits, while the Gorilla Glass Victus 2 protects the display. This panel offers a 410 ppi.

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 AM AH 07
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5

The Galaxy Z Fold 5, on the other hand, includes a 7.6-inch display too, but with an 1812 x 2176 resolution. It’s narrower. This is also a foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X display with a 120Hz refresh rate. It also supports HDR10+ content and offers a 91.1% screen-to-body ratio. The cover display on the phone measures 6.2 inches. It is a Dynamic AMOLED 2X panel with a refresh rate of up to 120Hz and Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 protects it.

All four of these displays are quite good. In fact, they’re very similar, other than the aspect ratio difference. The Galaxy Z Fold 6 certainly has a more comfortable cover display to use, as it’s wider and closer to displays on regular smartphones. All four displays are quite vivid and have good viewing angles. Those panels also do get bright enough, although they’re not the brightest around. The touch response is good, and they feel good to use. It’s also worth noting that while both foldable panels have quite noticeable creases, that crease is more noticeable on the Galaxy Z Fold 5.

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5: Performance

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 is fueled by the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy processor. That is an overclocked variant of the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, and the most powerful chip from Qualcomm. The device also comes with 12GB of LPDDR5X RAM and UFS 4.0 flash storage. The Galaxy Z Fold 5, on the flip side, is fueled by the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy chip. That is an overclocked variant of the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, and also a 4nm processor. This phone has the same amount of RAM, though it’s LPDDR5 RAM. Both smartphones use UFS 4.0 flash storage.

So, both smartphones are well-equipped in terms of performance-related specs. The Galaxy Z Fold 6 is more powerful, technically, but truth be said, from what we’ve seen thus far, you won’t really notice that day-to-day. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 was Qualcomm’s flagship chip for last year, and it does a fantastic job still. Both smartphones are very snappy when it comes to general usage (based on our initial impressions with the Galaxy Z Fold 6), regardless if we’re talking about opening apps and multitasking or browsing and image editing. They both get the job done and then some. Plus Samsung’s software is well-adapted for foldables.

We haven’t really tested the gaming aspect of the Galaxy Z Fold 6 just yet, you’ll have to wait for our full review for that. We are, however, expecting similar results to the Galaxy Z Fold 5. That device handles games just fine, as it should considering its specifications. That goes for even the most demanding games on the Google Play Store. We’ll see if the Galaxy Z Fold 6 does a similar job, the review is coming.

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5: Battery

Both of these smartphones include a 4,400mAh battery on the inside. The Galaxy Z Fold 5 was not particularly impressive in the battery department. Even when we didn’t use the main display most of the time, the phone didn’t make it up to 7 hours of screen-on-time. You can get there, but you’ll have to be very conservative. When we used the main display a bit more, like half the time, it was close to 6 hours of screen-on-time or less.

The Galaxy Z Fold 6 could bring some improvements in that regard, so we’ll see, but we didn’t properly test its battery life just yet. In all honesty, we’re expecting a similar performance to its predecessor. There are foldables out there with considerably larger batteries out there, but perhaps Samsung did some of its software magic here. Your experience with the Galaxy Z Fold 5 could have been different, of course, there are a lot of variables included here.

When it comes to charging, the two phones are on the same level. They both support 25W wired, 15W wireless, and 4.5W reverse wireless charging. What’s also the same is the fact that neither smartphone ships with a charger in the box. It took the Galaxy Z Fold 5 around 80 minutes to fully charge with a compatible 25W charger, and over two hours with wireless charging. The same will be the case with the Galaxy Z Fold 6, by the way.

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5: Cameras

The camera hardware remains unchanged on the Galaxy Z Fold 6 compared to its predecessor. The phone includes the same cameras on both the front and the back. A 50-megapixel main camera (f/1.8 aperture lens, dual pixel PDAF, OIS) sits on the back as the main camera. A 12-megapixel ultrawide camera (123-degree FoV, f/2.2 aperture lens) sits on the back too. The third camera on the back of both phones is a 10-megapixel telephoto shooter (3x optical zoom, OIS, f/2.4 aperture lens).

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 AM AH 17
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6

Under the main display on both phones sits a 4-megapixel unit (f/1.8 aperture lens, 2.0um pixel size). On the cover displays you’ll find a 10-megapixel selfie camera (f/2.2 aperture lens, 1.22um pixel size). We were hoping to see an improvement on the Galaxy Z Fold 6 in terms of cameras, as some of the competition offers considerably better camera hardware. That did not happen, however, Samsung decided to stick with the same setup this time around.

It’s too early to comment on the camera performance of the Galaxy Z Fold 6. While we did take some initial camera samples, we’re still not ready to comment on them. You’ll have to wait for our full review for that. Still, we expect the two phones to perform rather similarly considering the same hardware, though there will be some differences to speak of, of course.

Audio

Both of these phones have stereo speakers. We didn’t really get to test them properly just yet, but the difference doesn’t seem to be big at first. In fact, it’s possible the exact same hardware is used. We’ll know more after we properly test them and will talk more about them in our review. The sound is very good from both phones, though.

There is also no audio jack included here, which means you will need to use their Type-C ports if you’d like to hook up your stereo speakers. If you’d like to go wireless, do note that both smartphones support Bluetooth 5.3.


[ad_2]
Source link

Google Wallet app now supported on Galaxy Z Flip cover displays

0
[ad_1]

Recent Galaxy Z Flip models (like the new Galaxy Z Flip 6) have a cover display that prevents you from having to open the phone to use some apps. However, not all apps are compatible, with Google Wallet being one of those affected. Now, that issue has been solved, since users of some Galaxy Z Flip models can now enjoy all the functionality of the Google Wallet app from their secondary screen too. Soon, Galaxy Z Flip 6 users will also receive Gmail app support on the cover display.

Galaxy Z Flip series users could already make payments from their folded phones using Google Wallet. They just have to bring the device close to a contactless terminal to complete the payment. However, they could not access the full app functionality from the cover display. This means they still had to open the phone for anything else except paying. For example, when they wanted to switch between their cards or use loyalty cards.

Galaxy Z Flip 5 and 6 users can now open Google Wallet from their cover displays

Fortunately, it seems that Samsung has already fixed this problem without prior notice. As spotted by Android Police, the Google Wallet app is now fully compatible with the cover display of Galaxy Z Flip devices. Now, users will be able to add Google Wallet to the MultiStar cover display widget. The latter is an app launcher widget that you can set from Good Lock, Samsung’s customization hub. MultiStar is a kind of “folder” where you can include apps to launch from the cover display.

The source confirmed that the Google Wallet app works as intended on the cover displays of the Galaxy Z Flip 5 and 6. Apparently, Samsung added compatibility with the One UI 6.1 update. It is also possible that support arrived through a MultiStar or Google Wallet update. Be that as it may, it is good news for users of Z Flip devices.

How to set Google Wallet on your device’s cover display

To set Google Wallet on your Galaxy Z Flip device’s cover display, you just need to find and install Good Lock from the Galaxy Store > find and install the MultiStar module > Open Good Lock, then “MultiStar” > tap on “I ♥ Galaxy Foldable” > tap on “Launcher Widget” > find the Google Wallet icon to add it (you can also add any other app you want) > Add the widget.

galaxy z flip 6 google wallet cover display

Samsung should step up its game on app support for Z Flip devices’ cover displays

Samsung is the pioneer in the foldable smartphone segment. So, it is curious that their devices are lagging behind in terms of some functionalities compared to other brands. Similar products, like the Motorola Razr+, allow you to use virtually any app on the cover screen. The latter also does not require using “workarounds,” like setting an app launcher widget to run apps.


[ad_2]
Source link

You can trade-in any phone to get a discount of $300 on Galaxy Z Fold 6

0
[ad_1]

Samsung introduced its latest foldable smartphones – the Galaxy Z Fold 6 and Z Flip 6 – just a couple of days ago. Both the new flagship offerings are currently available to pre-order across channels. During the pre-order period, several trade offers from Samsung and major telecom operators are available for the latest Galaxy Z devices.

In addition, Samsung is boosting a trade-in offer on the Galaxy Z Fold 6, which gives you $300 back by exchanging almost any smartphone. Notably, the same offer is applicable to the Galaxy Z Flip 6. However, the trade-in credit value on old phones is limited to $200 on the clamshell-style foldable flagship.

The trade-in offer is giving $300 discount towards the Z Fold 6, Z Flip 6 in exchange for any device in working condition

Samsung is providing a discount of up to $300 towards the latest foldables when you exchange your old smartphone. To trade in your old device for a new Galaxy Z Fold 6 or Z Flip 6, visit the pre-order pages. On these pages, try to search for your phone in the provided lists in the box marked “Samsung trade-in.” If you can’t find your phone or tablet there, then select the “Other Android Smartphone” option.

Notably, as long as your phone meets Samsung’s terms, you will get up to $300 off the latest foldables. The age of the phone or tablet you’re exchanging doesn’t matter as long as it’s in good condition. It’s worth mentioning that Samsung may deem your device worth less than $300, as it is just an “estimated” value on the offer. You will get the exact estimate once your device is evaluated.

The old phone exchange offer is only available until July 24

Samsung is running all the promotional offers on the Z Fold 6 and Z Flip 6 during the pre-order period until July 24. Then, the general availability will kick off and the company will start shipping the new flagships.

As for the pricing, the Galaxy Z Flip 6 is available starting from $1,099 for the 256GB variant. The 512GB storage model will set you back by $1,219. The Galaxy Z Fold 6’s most affordable variant costs $1,899 and offers 256GB storage. The phone’s 512GB and 1TB models are available for $2,019 and $2,259, respectively. Both are being offered in a handful of attractive colorways.


[ad_2]
Source link

Here’s the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL compared to Samsung’s Galaxy S24 Ultra

0
[ad_1]

Google is slated to announce the Pixel 9 series next month, which includes the Pixel 9 Pro XL. For the first time, Google is slated to use both the “Pro” and “XL” monikers for this phone. And now we’re seeing a short hands on video of the device from YTechB who has posted a short 29 second video of it. And also comparing it’s size to the Galaxy S24 Ultra.

They are also comparing it to the regular Google Pixel 9, which you can tell the difference based on how wide the camera window is on the back. Obviously, the Pixel 9 has a dual-camera setup, while the Pixel 9 Pro XL has a triple-camera setup. Otherwise, the two are identical aside from the size. Though the Pixel 9 Pro XL does sport a matte finish on the side rails, while the Pixel 9 has a glossy finish. Similar to the Pixel 8 and Pixel 8 Pro from last year.

Pixel 9 Pro XL is about the same size as the Galaxy S24 Ultra

In this next video, we can see the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL side-by-side with the Galaxy S24 Ultra. It looks to be about the same size, though the Galaxy S24 Ultra is more squared off versus the Pixel here. As the Pixel does have much more rounded corners than usual. Those that like large phones are going to love the Pixel 9 Pro XL.

The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL does also include ultra-wideband, something that the base model does not have. Which has been the case over the last few years with Pixel devices, so no real surprises here. Google is likely using ultra-wideband to beef up its Find My Device network, as it is rumored to be included in the Pixel Watch 3. That smartwatch just recently got certified, and it included UWB. This is a feature that Samsung has been adding to its phones and wearables for the past few years – since the Galaxy S20. So good to see it launching on even more devices.


[ad_2]
Source link

Fake Microsoft Teams for Mac delivers Atomic Stealer

0
[ad_1]

Competition between stealers for macOS is heating up, with a new malvertising campaign luring Mac users via a fraudulent advert for Microsoft Teams. This attack comes on the heels of the new Poseidon (OSX.RodStealer) project, another threat using a similar code base and delivery techniques.

Based on our tracking, Microsoft Teams is once again a popular keyword threat actors are bidding on, and it is the first time we have seen it used by Atomic Stealer. Communication tools like Zoom, Webex or Slack have been historically coveted by criminals who package them as fake installers laced with malware.

This latest malvertising campaign was running for at least a few days and used advanced filtering techniques that made it harder to detect. Once we were able to reproduce a full malware delivery chain, we immediately reported the ad to Google.

Top search result for Microsoft teams

We were able to reliably search for and see the same malicious ad for Microsoft Teams which was likely paid for by a compromised Google ad account. For a couple of days, we could not see any malicious behavior as the ad redirected straight to Microsoft’s website. After numerous attempts and tweaks, we finally saw a full attack chain.

Despite showing the microsoft.com URL in the ad’s display URL, it has nothing to do with Microsoft at all. The advertiser is located in Hong Kong and runs close to a thousand unrelated ads.

Malicious redirect and payload

We confirmed the ad was indeed malicious by recording a network capture (see below). Each click is first profiled (smart[.]link) to ensure only real people (not bots, VPNs) proceed, followed by a cloaking domain (voipfaqs[.]com) separating the initial redirect from the malicious landing (decoy) page (teamsbusiness[.]org).

Victims land on a decoy page showing a button to download Teams. A request is made to a different domain (locallyhyped[.]com) where a unique payload (file name and size) is generated for each visitor.

Once the downloaded file MicrosoftTeams_v.(xx).dmg is mounted, users are instructed to open it via a right click in order to bypass Apple’s built-in protection mechanism for unsigned installers.

In the video below, we show the steps required to install this malicious application, noting that you are instructed to enter your password and grant access to the file system. This may not come as unusual for someone wanting to install a new program, but it is exactly what Atomic Stealer needs to grab keychain passwords and important files.

Following the data theft is the data exfiltration step, only visible via a network packet collection tool. A single POST request is made to a remote web server (147.45.43[.]136) with the data being encoded.

Mitigations

As cyber criminals ramp up their distribution campaigns, it becomes more dangerous to download applications via search engines. Users have to navigate between malvertising (sponsored results) and SEO poisoning (compromised websites).

To mitigate such risks, we recommend using browser protection tools that can block ads and malicious websites. Often times, threat actors will rely on redirects from ads or compromised networks that can be stopped before even downloading a malicious installer.

Malwarebytes for Mac detects this threat as OSX.AtomStealer:

Indicators of Compromise

Cloaking domain

voipfaqs[.]com

Decoy site

teamsbusiness[.]org

Download URL

locallyhyped[.]com/kurkum/script_66902619887998[.]92077775[.]php

Atomic Stealer payload

7120703c25575607c396391964814c0bd10811db47957750e11b97b9f3c36b5d

Atomic Stealer C2

147.45.43[.]136

[ad_2]
Source link